Legal Final Exam OutlineLegal Final Exam Outline Was the answer to that class question GM or FaceBook??I put FBdoes scienter = fraud for that question?scienter means it is something done with the intention of causing problems Chapters On Test: (test one: 1, 3, 4, 6, 7), (test two: 11, 10, 8, 9, 13), and (20, 17, 21, 15)Exam One Google Docs:If you are still reading this you are fucked. lol1. https://docs./google.com/document/d/1Pj5ekvC1swGz8LXjE-P068Jf_H_k26-WIrp4ALu6_ew/edit2. https://docs.google.com/document/d/11xoec8A84nLfTXBq9Af4uPMIu6B_Bc0M2OZhn2zMVG8/edit?pli=1Exam Two Google Doc:1. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1pYWNw8aaL1a8d7dLUM7rQ-KWMW9PvY4QPQ2. OxOrq_8F8/edi 3. anybody got a googledoc for the 3rd section’s terms? → scroll down homie lol4. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^The Exam is TODAY (Dec 11th) at 12 p.m located in our normal classroom. 100% sure.ARE YALL EXCITED?? Can we go sit in the classroom yet?I have a question… Google Doc for Reed’s Final last spring. It also has some quizlets at the very end. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1M0MiyEALKlyMskGkY-bfXgMm-UjCnRhO9KwWuH05FxA/edithttp://quizlet.com/41558128/chapter-20-legl-2700-reed-flash-cards/http://quizlet.com/41576941/chapter-17-legl-2700-reed-flash-cards/http://quizlet.com/41624861/chapter-15-legl-2700-reed-flash-cards/http://quizlet.com/41556580/chapter-21-legl-2700-reed-flash-cards/How in depth to the first 10 chapters are yall going? Just what’s on the powerpoints?^ yes only questions that are in both the book and class will be asked so just study ppts -He said in the last class that there would be NO book-onlyor lecture-only questions on the first 10 chapters. Just the main points fromthe PowerPoints. he said a quick look over the powerpoints will do for the first chapters^affirmed. He said no old court casesHow do I know what animal I am? This is driving me crazyjust check every thingy and use deductive reasoning wish it were easier Court Cases I have: (please add any I missed!)1. Thompson vs. North American Stainless (2011)2. Ricci vs. Destefano Case (2009)3. United States vs. O’Hagan (1997)4. Gibbons vs. Ogden (did we talk about this in class?)5. Filburn Man w/ veggie garden during Agr. Adj. Act (Cannot own veggie garden bc, even though it is intrastate, it affects price level/ interstate commerce if all farmers made their own veggie gardens)6. We talked about Obamacare in the Supreme Court (not constitutional under commerce clause, is constitutional as a tax)7. Anne Hopkins, who sued and won for discrimination based on gender expectation when she wasn’t ‘feminine’ enough8. Ledbetter v Goodyear ---Remember the outcome of the Lilly Ledbetter case that prompted congress to pass the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act•FINAL EXAM INFORMATION•80 questions•30 (t/f)•50 multiple choice•New material: 50 questions•Old material: 30 questions•Chapter 1: 1 question•Chapter 3: 3 questions/•Chapter 4: 3 •Chapter 6: 2•Chapter 7: 2•Chapter 11: 3•Chapter 10: 6•Chapters 8 and 9: 7u•Chapter 13: 3 questions•Chapter 20: 17 questions•Chapter 17: 18 questions•Chapter 21: 6 errrrrrrrrrrr5•Chapter 15: 3 questions.•6 questions on Enron DID REED SPECIFY WHAT SORT OF QUESTIONS WOULD BE ASKED ON OLD CONTENT????? LIKE BROAD GENERAL QUESTIONS OR SPECIFIC QUESTIONS FROM THE OLD TESTS?^all I remember is that it will info from slides...nothing reed has a chode specifically from book or specifically from class^I went into his office hours and he said he was not going to go to in depth into old material, just kind of graze the surface, but all new material will be as in depth as any other test. No court cases or questions only from class for old material too.THIS IS JUST A BOOK OUTLINE IF SOMEONE WANTS TO GO THROUGH AND ADD CLASS EXAMPLES THAT’D BE PRETTY RAD THANKS (preferably in a different color) ^^^^^^^^^^^^Chapter 20: Discrimination in EmploymentCivil Right Act of 1964 (Title VII) Title VII is part of the CRA of 1964 (the part about employment)1. General Provisionsa. Applies to employers with 15 or more employees, labor unions, etc.b. Purpose : eliminate job discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national originc. Bona fide occupational qualifications: Where discrimination is necessary to normal business operations Ex: Catholic priests are mend. Title VII also permits discrimination if it results unintentionally from seniority or merit system Said in class we don’t have to worry about seniority systemse. Employer action where discrimination is prohibited include: i. Discharge ii. Refusal to hire iii. Compensationp iv. Terms, conditions, or privileges of employment2. Enforcement Proceduresa. Title VII created the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) i. Has the primary responsibility of the enforcing provisions of the act ii. Composed of five members1. No more than three can be from the same political party2. Appointed by the president, with the advice and consent of the Senate3. Serve 5 year terms iii. Under the Equal Employment Opportunity Act of 1972, the EEOC can file a civil suit in federal district court and represent a person charging a violation of the act. (but it first must try to settle outside the courts) b. 1991 Amendments: allows the recovery of compensatory and punitive damages of up to $300,000 per person. (in addition to other remedies) i. Allowed only when employers are guilty of intentional discrimination(disparate treatment) ii. States that a statistically imbalanced workforce is not enough in itself to establish a violation of title VII.c. Winning a Title VII Civil Action: i. Must prove steps taken by the employer that showed an illegally discriminatory basis ii. Plaintiff must prove disparate treatment or disparate impact1. Disparate treatment: that the employer intentionally discriminated against the plaintiff Only defense to this is that everyone from the victim’s class is unable to perform the job (Examples in class: Hooters, Abercrombie and Fitch)- BFOQ^I know the A&F one was about the girl with the head dress but what was the hooters example? The A&F girl was allowed to wear her head wrap, A&F lost that dispute. what about hooters? ← Hooters wouldn’t hire dudes to be hooters girls. the dudes got a lot of $ and as part of settlement hooters had to increase employment opportunity for men through bartending/hosting/etc← fuck that no one wants to see dudes when they go to