DOC PREVIEW
MU BUS 101C - Social Responsibility v. Philanthropy
Type Lecture Note
Pages 2

This preview shows page 1 out of 2 pages.

Save
View full document
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 2 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 2 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

BUS 101 1st Edition Lecture 17Outline of Previous Lecture- Section 16: Society Society as a stakeholdero Societal impacto Employment lawo Business and societyOutline of Current Lecture - Section 17: Social Responsibility v. Philanthropy Society as a stakeholdero Philanthropyo Social Responsibility Perspectiveso Financialo Legalo Ethical Malden Mills Exampleo Bad Business Balance Businesso Can be ethical and profitable- Section 17: Social Responsibility v. Philanthropy Society as a stakeholdero Philanthropy – charity and donation, a cause that you valueo Social responsibility – business as a member of society- Society may be a direct stakeholder - Society may be a stakeholder due to an issue in the public sphere Perspectiveso Financial Perspective Profitability, bottom line, short term and sustainability- Long term goals can hurt short term; hostile acquisition- Quantifiable (empirical objective standard)o Legal perspective Is it legal? - Quantifiable (empirical objective standard)o Ethical perspectiveThese notes represent a detailed interpretation of the professor’s lecture. GradeBuddy is best used as a supplement to your own notes, not as a substitute. Personal, organizational, or cultural beliefs?  Has a quantifiable ethical standard- Mission & values statements set direction for decision making - Organizational culture – perspective always form the top-down approach Malden Mills Example o Bad business Plan benefitted employee, customer, supply chain and society Plan had negative effects for investors- Failed to manage money, had no long term sustainability- Could have kept original intent and modifiedo Less than full salary: workers qualify for unemployment, supplement with bonus. Pay older workers off to retire, new technology requires less workers Balance Businesso Can be ethical and profitable Balance competing business: creative & expanding options for a solution Think outside of the


View Full Document
Download Social Responsibility v. Philanthropy
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view Social Responsibility v. Philanthropy and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view Social Responsibility v. Philanthropy 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?