DOC PREVIEW
UW-Milwaukee CRMJST 275 - Defense Attorneys - Duties Con't

This preview shows page 1 out of 2 pages.

Save
View full document
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 2 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 2 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

CRM JST 275 1st Edition Lecture 13I. Prosecutorial Duties: Pre-Triala. Disclosure of evidence (Discovery)i. List of testimony and evidence to be used at trialii. Exculpatory evidence (Brady v Maryland, 1963) – evidence that suggest this person is innocentiii. Impeachment evidenceiv. Consequences if fail to discloseb. Plea bargainingi. Maximum possible chargeinitiate bargain (do they overcharge?)ii. “Going rate”iii. Why plea bargain?c. Prepare defense: challenge witness, plea, or alibi – affirmative II. Prosecutorial Duties: Trial & Aftera. Case-in-chiefi. Goes first in a trialii. Burden of proof – level b. Sentencingi. Recommendations1. i.e. based on severity of crime, risk to communityIII. Assistant Prosecutorsa. Typically out of law schooli. Gain experience with trialsii. Learn about law-in-actioniii. Develop skills (i.e. a “good case”)b. Working in the Courtroom Workgroupi. Learn through observation and mentoringii. Others in the workgroup…iii. Informal rules of case processing1. i.e. “going rates” and expectationsIV. Expansion of Prosecutorial Discretiona. Hydraulic model of discretioni. Where discretion is tempered – moves elsewhereb. Mandatory sentencing lawsi. Limiting judicial discretionii. Increases prosecutor’s discretion at charging and bargaining1. i.e. invoking repeat offender clause at charging2. i.e. substantial assistance departuresV. Prosecutorial Ethicsa. Adversarial systemb. Primary duty to seek justice (not conviction)i. Berger v U.S. (1935)ii. Wrong to convict the innocentiii. Should not operate outside of the lawVI. Prosecutorial Misconducta. Results: overturned, dismissal, disbarb. Includes:i. Courtroom misconduct1. Grand jury and trial jury procedures2. Badgering witnesses3. Inflammatory remarksii. Evidence problems:1. Mishandling evidence/statements2. Failing to disclose exculpatory evidence3. Using false or misleading evidenceiii. Harassing, bias against defendantiv. Sanctions: depend on intent1. None = no intent; reversal conviction, suspension, disbarmentVII. Community Prosecutiona. Used toi. Identify and solve problemsii. Enhance public safetyiii. Improve the quality of life in the communityb. Five core elementsi. Proactive approach to crimeii. A defined target areaiii. An emphasis on problem-solving, public safetyiv. Partnerships with law enforcement and communityv. Non-traditional enforcement methodsc. i.e. District 3 Operation PatrolVIII. Specialized Prosecution Unitsa. i.e. gang unit, SA unit, DV unit, drug crime unit (just examples; there can be more)b. Goals:i. Gain specialization and knowledge through routine casesii. Increase effectiveness, conviction rates and efficiencyiii. Problem-solving courts: understanding and victim


View Full Document

UW-Milwaukee CRMJST 275 - Defense Attorneys - Duties Con't

Download Defense Attorneys - Duties Con't
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view Defense Attorneys - Duties Con't and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view Defense Attorneys - Duties Con't 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?