DOC PREVIEW
WSU MKTG 477 - Budget "effects" continued
Type Lecture Note
Pages 2

This preview shows page 1 out of 2 pages.

Save
View full document
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 2 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 2 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

MKTG 477 1st Edition Lecture 21 Outline of Last Lecture I. Considerations when setting a promotional budgetII. Budget “effects”Outline of Current Lecture I. Budget “effects” continued II. Federal Trade CommissionCurrent LectureMarch 11–Budget “effects” continued - Delayed response – consumers see ads but don’t buy the product immediately (Bad)- Hold over – consumers are able to retain information in memory; do not have to see the ad again before buying the product (Bad)- Decay – in the absence of further promotion, the effects of past promotional dollars (on consumer goodwill, brand name awareness, sales, etc.) will be diminished (Bad)o Number 1 incentive for why advertisers overspend – they are fearful they are not spending enough (which would lead to decay)- Competitor – your competitors’ promotional programs (and the amount of money they’re spending on them) will influence how effective your campaign will be (Bad)- Quality – the effectiveness of your ad program is dependent upon the unique content, presentation, and placement of the promotion – not solely on the dollars spent (Bad)o If your ad is placed properly in the correct medium with the right niche/targeting strategy then it will be successful, not necessarily how much you spend  A “good” ad will have greater impact on consumers than will a “bad” adRegulatory Environment – Situation analysis (other forces/trends)What regulatory body is probably most influential in scrutinizing advertising practices (especially deceptive practices)?- Federal Trade Commission o “AT&T to pay $80 million to FTC for consumer refunds in mobile cramming case”Federal Trade Commission (FTC)These notes represent a detailed interpretation of the professor’s lecture. GradeBuddy is best used as a supplement to your own notes, not as a substitute.- FTC Act 1914 – established the Federal Trade Commissiono Focused on “competitive injury”- Wheeler-Lea Amendment 1938 – amended the FTC Acto Added “consumer injury” to the FTC’s focus o And, “intent to defraud” did not have to be proven to rule that deceptions had occurred - FTC protectso Consumers (re: fairness and deception) Consumer Protection Division Target groups of fairness - Children- Elderly- Financially disabled  Deceptive - Before and after ads- Lean Cuisine ad – “All the things we make, we make sense!”o Businesses (re: competitive practices) Anti-Trust/Competition Division- Determining “deception” 3


View Full Document

WSU MKTG 477 - Budget "effects" continued

Type: Lecture Note
Pages: 2
Download Budget "effects" continued
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view Budget "effects" continued and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view Budget "effects" continued 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?