DOC PREVIEW
UI LAW 8460 - Menard v. Cashman

This preview shows page 1 out of 2 pages.

Save
View full document
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 2 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 2 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

Case BriefEvidence, Unit 10: words as non-hearsay, silenceStensvaag, 2/14/15Identity of CaseMenard v. Cashman, 55 A.2d 156 (1947)Page 89 of the casebookSummary of Facts/Procedural HistoryA landlord is sued for a slip in fall, liable for negligence based on the amount of tread she had on her stairs. The fact that no one had complained to tenant (landlord’s employee) was deemed inadmissible. Statement of the IssueIs the lack of complaint admissible to establish safety? HoldingIt is hearsay…this case doesn’t make much sense. WE didn’t talk about it in class. ReasoningThe evidence that no one had complained is of pretty weak value, and the witness stated that she did not know of anyone complaining. There is a need for knowledge. (this wasn’t a case of admission by party opponent because the sponsoring attorney belonged to the defendant).


View Full Document

UI LAW 8460 - Menard v. Cashman

Download Menard v. Cashman
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view Menard v. Cashman and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view Menard v. Cashman 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?