DOC PREVIEW
UI LAW 8460 - Hanson v. Johnson

This preview shows page 1 out of 2 pages.

Save
View full document
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 2 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 2 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

Case BriefEvidence, Unit 10: statements not hearsay, silenceStensvaag, 2/14/15Identity of CaseHanson v. Johnson, 201 N.W. 322 (1924)Page 92 of the casebookSummary of Facts/Procedural HistoryPlaintiff was owed 3/5ths of tenants corn for rent, other parts of the crop were mortgaged out. Without tenants permission, bank collected the plaintiff’s portion and sold it, plaintiff sued. Evidence that the tenant told plaintiff “those three sections are yours,” was not admitted. Appealed. Statement of the IssueIs the statement dividing the sections of corn which are owned by the plaintiff inadmissible hearsay? HoldingThe statement is not offered for its truth value, but as an operative fact. The words have legal significance, transfer of title of sorts.


View Full Document

UI LAW 8460 - Hanson v. Johnson

Download Hanson v. Johnson
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view Hanson v. Johnson and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view Hanson v. Johnson 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?