DOC PREVIEW
Southern Miss PSY 374 - Scenarios Set 2

This preview shows page 1 out of 2 pages.

Save
View full document
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 2 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 2 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

PSY 374 1st Edition Lecture 9OUTLINE OF LAST LECTUREI. Scenarios- set 1OUTLINE OF CURRENT LECTURE I. Scenarios- Set 2CURRENT LECTUREI. Scenarios- Set 21) John and Jim are in the TV room arguing over a program. Their mother comesin and immediately turns the TV off and says that she will turn it on again when they have played nicely for 10 minutes. What two processes has she used in order to achieve the results she wanted? Why would it be better to use the two contingencies together rather than to use alone?-Removal punishment and positive reinforcement- Together the two procedures give alternative substitute behavior, which is incompatible with the fighting.2) Paul is being sent to time out for hitting his sister. “That’s okay, I like it there” he says. His mother, in exasperation, does not send him to time out but merely yells at him for hitting. Why didn’t the mother send Paul to time out? Was this a good decision? How could she be sure? What process is probably operating on Paul’s future likelihood of trying to avoid time out in this way?-She probably thought Time-out was reinforcing [based on what the child said]. It probably wasn’t a good decision. She should probably go ahead and use Time-Out and look at its effects on the child’s behavior. Paul’s behavior of trying to get out of Time-Out is negatively reinforced because Time-Out is “taken away” when Paul protests.3) What type of contingency would be operating when a school-phobic child gets suspended for fighting at school? Would fighting be expected to increase or decrease? What might be a better penalty for someone who finds school aversive?-Negative reinforcement because school is essentially “removed” following the fighting. Fighting would be expected to increase. Some kind of punishment procedure [perhaps Presentation Punishment] does not involve removal from school [i.e. after school detention].4) After having some trouble in spelling, Sam studied very hard for a spelling test. As the next test approaches, he has not yet gotten his grade from the earlier test. How might this lack of feedback affect the chances that he will study for the next test? What process would be operating?-His studying may be extinguished, assuming that getting feedback is reinforcing [it is for many children, unless getting his grade is punishing]. It’s important to provide feedback as soon as possible.5) A teacher offered a prize to every student who finished his or her work for the day. After the students’ performance improved, she decided to give awards only to students who finished their work for the whole week. After the first 3 days, she noticed that the students’ performance had deteriorated. What process was operating for these days? How might the teacher have avoided the decrease in performance?-She may inadvertently given 3 days of extinction. She should take more gradual steps. Also, she could give verbal reinforcers to “tide them


View Full Document

Southern Miss PSY 374 - Scenarios Set 2

Download Scenarios Set 2
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view Scenarios Set 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view Scenarios Set 2 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?