DOC PREVIEW
BGSU PHIL 1020 - The Search for Objective Moral Standards

This preview shows page 1 out of 3 pages.

Save
View full document
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 3 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 3 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

PHIL 1020 1st Edition Lecture 9 Outline of Last Lecture 1. Problems of Relativism Outline of Current Lecture II. Two Main Religious Ethics III. Divine Command Theory (DCT)IV. Religious Motivation Current Lecture2. Two Main Religious EthicsA problem with cultural relativism and individual subjectivism.- Where do we look for objective moral standards?o Many answer: to religionTwo Main Religious Ethics1. Divine Theory2. Natural Law Theory3. Divine Command Theory (DCT)The objective standards of morality are given to us by God or the gods.- “morally right” = “commanded by God”- “morally wrong” = “forbidden by God”o These moral rules are absolute (no exceptions), universal (apply to everybody), and eternal (since beginning of time until end)-Where do we find these commands?- Scriptures (e.g., bible)- Religious figures (e.g., prophets)These notes represent a detailed interpretation of the professor’s lecture. GradeBuddy is best used as a supplement to your own notes, not as a substitute.- Religious leaders (e.g., pastor)- Personal revelation (e.g., praying for a sign or answer)-Attractions of DCT1. Billions of people seem to agree with it (*fallacy alert)2. Provides, clear objective rules3. Apply to all individuals and cultures equally4. Rules are eternal, unchangingBut…- How clear is the guidance we get from religion?- The issue of homosexualityo E.g., there are particular plants and food given in the bible that people don’t follow but it doesn’t get noticed.-Problems with Religious Moral Guidelines1. Disagreements2. Applying guidelines today3. Inconsistences4. Nonbelievers?- “so what?”, no moral pull5. Believers seem to pick and choose (ignore a lot of guidelines) e.g., regard some commandments more than others-3 assumptions (only 2 provided in these notes)- made by those who view that religion1. Only through religion can we be motivated to act moraly- Glaucon: the only reason people act morally is fear of bad consequences if they don’t.2.God created morality- An act is morally right if it is commanded by God or the gods- Problem: two ways of interpreting thisV. Religious MotivationWestern monotheistic religions fear of eternal pain/promise of eternal bliss- Hinduism/Karma- Problem with this?o Fear of hell might make me act “morally” but is that a good motivation? (for


View Full Document

BGSU PHIL 1020 - The Search for Objective Moral Standards

Download The Search for Objective Moral Standards
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view The Search for Objective Moral Standards and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view The Search for Objective Moral Standards 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?