Mathews vsMassell

(2 pages)
Previewing page 1 of actual document.

Could not display document, please try refreshing this page a few times.

Please contact support if you are unable to view this document.

Mathews vsMassell


Lecture number:
2
Pages:
2
Type:
Lecture Note
School:
Cornell University
Course:
Econ 4040 - Economics and the Law
Edition:
1

Unformatted text preview:

Lecture 2 Outline of Last Lecture I. American vs Commonwealth Rules II. Civil vs Criminal trials III. Types of Laws Outline of Current Lecture I. Mathews vsMassell II. Tilton vs Richardson III. There is no such thing as a free lunch Current Lecture Mathews vsMassell (Mayor)- $4.5 M tax rebate to town citizens but could potentially get reversed and get a 10% fee on this type of spending given that it isn’t a priority expenditure Simply a transfer of fees and very expensive to monitor this type of activity but overruled because it is not a priority expenditure In terms of economic analysis, how could this ruling be considered given the inefficiencies of regulating this policy? Tilton vs Richardson (Secretary of the US)-decision to allow for available grants to colleges and universities, including those that are religiously affiliated, in order to construct buildings and facilities that are used exclusively for secular educational purposes. The taxpayers objected to grants to four institutions in Connecticut, all of which were religiously affiliated- claims that the buildings did not promote religious indoctrination In terms of economics analysis, must look at the unitary elasticity of demand and see how spending shifts once taxpayer’s funds can be used for the buildings- does religious spending go up or down and how are other funds utilized in this case? Could be considered in future decisions regarding spending There is no such thing as a free lunch Example: An apartment building used to have all inclusive security 24/7. Over time this expense became too much and security was reduced, a resident was then mugged and injured in the building and is suing the owners of the building for damages and negligence. If successful, more buildings would likely increase security measures and these costs would be Econ 4040 1st Edition



View Full Document

Access the best Study Guides, Lecture Notes and Practice Exams