DOC PREVIEW
UNC-Chapel Hill PSYC 101 - psychology-101-social-fall-2014-DP-lecture-student-version

This preview shows page 1-2-20-21 out of 21 pages.

Save
View full document
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 21 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 21 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 21 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 21 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 21 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

Slide 1Social influenceConformityConformityConformityConformityObedienceSlide 8Slide 9Why do we obey?ObedienceBystander EffectNew York TragedyBystander effectSlide 15Social LoafingSlide 17Social LoafingWhy/When Does This Happen?Reducing social loafingHow Might We Avoid Social Loafing?Social Behavior:The Influence of the GroupSocial influenceConformityConformityAsch conformity studiesGroup sizeUnanimityConformity•Why do we conform?•What factors influence conformity?ConformityObedienceWhy do we obey?•Obeying can fulfill•Obeying is not all badObedienceThe power of the situationZimbardo Stanford Prison SimulationBYSTANDER EFFECTNew York TragedyMarch 27th 1964 : New York Times“Kitty” Genovese: early 1960 young lady late 20s attacked coming home from work. A lot of ppl heard screams for help but no one called the cops or helped for about 30mins. Lead to the bystander effectBystander effect“as number of bystanders goes up [i.e. group gets larger], the probability of any individual bystander intervening goes down” (Darley & Latane, 1969)Other factors that influence helping behavior: diffusion of responsibility When people are alone they react about 75% of the timeIn the presence of others decreases to about 53% How dangerous is the situation/ safety risk for yourselfAmbiguity of the situation: how clear is the present situation do they really need it?Do you have the ability to help? Ex: are you strong enough to pull them up out of the tracks?Who that person is to you? Brother? mother? sister? Stranger?SOCIAL LOAFINGSocial LoafingThe tendency to exert less effort when working on a group task in which individual contributions cannot be monitoredRingelmann effect: same as social loafing and the first experimental example of this construct Clip: Does pulling behavior go down when you have more people? Yes adding ppl results in less effort per personWhy/When Does This Happen?1.Diffusion of responsibility 2.Less worried about being evaluated 3.When you perceive that your efforts don’t matter4.When you don’t care about the group or the taskReducing social loafingIncrease ability to identify specific individuals: performance evaluationsIncreasing group members perceived importanceIncrease involvement (rotate roles)Set individual goalsSmaller groupsCollectivistic societiesHow Might We Avoid Social


View Full Document

UNC-Chapel Hill PSYC 101 - psychology-101-social-fall-2014-DP-lecture-student-version

Download psychology-101-social-fall-2014-DP-lecture-student-version
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view psychology-101-social-fall-2014-DP-lecture-student-version and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view psychology-101-social-fall-2014-DP-lecture-student-version 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?