DOC PREVIEW
CU-Boulder SOCY 1004 - Final Exam Study Guide

This preview shows page 1-2-3-4-5 out of 16 pages.

Save
View full document
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 16 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 16 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 16 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 16 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 16 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 16 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

SOCY 1004 1st EditionFinal Exam Study GuideI. The organization of devianceA. Intro:-Focus on the lives and experiences of “deviants”-Relationships between them-How groups and acts are organized.-1) number of members -2) task specialization-3) stratification within group-4) type of authority structure-The more cohesive the group:-Better able to avoid outside sanctions -More committed to their deviant identity -The organization tends to reflect the needs to reflect the needs of the members-The more organization tends to reflect the needs of the members-The more formal/organized the group:-More complex (The group and the act)-Skills, roles, stratification-New norms, guidelines-More protection, increased access to resources-Range of ways “deviants” socially organize:-Loners-Solitary deviance-No relationships with like others -Colleagues-Solitary deviance-Relationships with like others, but don’t require cooperation-Peers-Engage in deviance with others (cooperation)-Crews-Engage in deviance with others (cooperation)-More sophisticated division of labors/stratification-Formal organizations-Large group-Highly organized, stratified-White-collar crime-Occupational (individuals acting on own behalf)-Organizational (committed with support of the organization)II. Drug Use and eating disorders within college womenA. Loner deviance-Mostly solitary, some interaction, but deviance kept secret-Don’t form groups based on the deviant act**-Lack of camaraderie of like others**-Commit act alone-Movement from conforming to non-conforming alone B. Contextualizing the research-Looks at licit pharmaceutical drugs or illicit street drugs in an ongoing effect to manage body weight -instrumental: motivation to use predicated on specific effects-instrumental drug use: sample and study-college women, large public university-pathway adaption to norm conformity (body) C. 2 dimensions of drug use and disordered eating-1) Temporal primacy-Eating disorder-Drug use-2) Legality-Licit (pharmaceutical)-Illicit (“street”) D. 4 Types:-1) Conventional over conformists-Disordered eating first-Licit drug use second-2) Scroungers-Disordered eating first-Illicit drug use second-3) Journeyers-Licit drug use first-Disordered eating second-4) Opportunists-Illicit drug use first-Disordered eating second E. 3 problems of loner instrumental drug use-1) Social Isolation-Motivation to “fit in” results in being “left out”-2) Health consequences-Self-consequences of risk-Physical; psychological-3) Financing drug use-Different markets (licit vs. illicit)-Restricted access to resources-Hiding spending-SacrificesIII. Cyber Communities of self-injury (online communities)- Adler and AdlerA. Community of loners?-Loners in the “real world”-Colleagues online-Hybrid associational form (loners and colleagues)-Commit act alone-Do not engage in face-to-face interaction-Colleagues: relationships, but not reliance-Online communities offer-Support-Acceptance-Camaraderie-Information-Shred identity B. Characteristics-Cut, burn, brand, or otherwise injure-Deliberate, but not suicidal-Achieve relief-Past: Relatively small and unknown population-Now: Burgeoning, but largely secretive (acceptance and support)-Sample characteristics: -Mostly occurred in Middle/high School-3/4 women, all white-Depression, alienation, rebellion-A form of comfort during stressful C. Formulating ideology-Solitary: constructing meaning and rationalization to legitimate their deviance-Difficulty in giving social meaning and legitimacy to acts-Community can help this process D. Social Isolation-Behavior viewed as private, not to be shared-A need for focus and concentration of being alone while injuring themselves-Given opportunity to interact or meet other self-injurers, many withdrew from or avoided interactions E. Practical problems-Without a table subculture, self-injurers found themselves on their own in coping with practical problems presented by their deviance-Difficulty explaining away scars-Increased recognition=increased confrontation-Led to cutting in places that weren’t as visible such as the stomach, thighs, etc.-Lack of supportF. Normative Socialization-Self-injurers socialized by society not by fellow deviants-Choose deviance because they face situations where respectable courses of action are not attractive or satisfactory-Resulted in condemnation of their behavior and feelings of shameG. Strain-Strain behavior normative expectations and deviant behavior-Lack of support made it difficult to reaffirm meaning of their deviance-Lack of support made deviance unstable (difficultly sustaining deviance over long periods of time)-Ceasing their deviance left strong feelings of abuseIV: Gender and victimization-Risk among young women in gangs (peers)- MillerA. Contextualizing the research -Gangs as peers-Engage with like others-Reliant on each other (cooperative)-Minimal diversion of labor-Leader vs. followers-Illegal goods and/or services-Urban street gangs-Evolving (sophistication, new members)-Status and protection-Access to resources-Danger-Women in gangsB.3 features of gender, gangs, and violence-1) Gangs as protection and risk-2) Gender and status-3) Devaluation and victimization1) Gangs as protection and risk-Why do girls/women join groups?-Protection-From “outsiders”-Predatory means-Risk-Dangers, violent arenas-“Be down” for anything-Increased risk from “insiders” 2) Gender and status -Stratification between men and women-First:-Gangs are male-dominated-Masculine characteristics-higher status-Women: fighting, “tough,” “do dirt”-Women: too masculine? Punishment-Second-Men=leadership positions-Women=lower status positions-Women=elevating status positions:-Masculine qualities-Connection to high status men 3) Devaluation and victimization from within-Stratification-Between (men and women)-Within (women)-The lower the status, the more victimization from within-Knowing “their place”-Sexual dynamics-Entering the gang-Sexed in-Beaten in-Ongoing vulnerabilityV: The Social Organizations of devianceA. Intro:-Deviant associations:-Formal organizations-Larger group-Highly organized, stratified-White-collar crime-Occupational (individuals acting on own behalf)-OrganizationalB. Formal organizations-Larger than peers and crews-Extending over time and space-(Cosa Nostra Mafia “families”, Columbian drug cartels)-May involve


View Full Document

CU-Boulder SOCY 1004 - Final Exam Study Guide

Documents in this Course
Load more
Download Final Exam Study Guide
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view Final Exam Study Guide and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view Final Exam Study Guide 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?