DOC PREVIEW
Mizzou PSYCH 2410 - Final Exam Study Guide
Type Study Guide
Pages 6

This preview shows page 1-2 out of 6 pages.

Save
View full document
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 6 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 6 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 6 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

PSYCH 2410 1st Edition Final Exam Study Guide Lectures: 18-25Lecture 18- Infant AttachmentI. Theorists- During the first year of life, infants develop attachment to primary caregivers (physical and emotional)- Sigmund Freud: mother-child relationship is important for developmento “Drive-Reduction Theory”: mother satisfies infant’s primary needs (ex: food) and as a result infant develops affection for the mother- John Bowlby: disagrees with Freudo Found that when children were separated they fell into despair, depressiono Determined attachment cannot be explained by drive-reduction theory- Renee Spitz: studied deprivation in motheringo Studied orphans of felon mothers Found that more died when not in mother’s care and had a lower IQ despite adequate nutrition- Harry Harlow: sought to examine the drive-reduction theory with monkey experimento Method: separated monkey from mother can gave them one wire mother with food and one mother with cloth and no food. o Results: monkeys spent more time with cloth motherII. Attachment Development- Attachment relationship: enduring emotional time between child and primary caregivero Secure base from which to explore environmento Safe haven to retreat to during uncertainty- Infants evolved to develop attachments because it promotes survival- Four Phases of Attachment Development:1) Pre-attachment: (birth-6 weeks), innate signals bring Mom2) Attachment-in-the-making: (6 weeks-6/8 months), attend to more familiar people3) Clear-cut attachment: (6/8 months-1.5/2 years), actively seek comfort from caregivers, mom is secure base, distress at separation4) Reciprocal Relationships: (1.5/2 years+), increasing abilities to organize efforts to be near efforts, communicate loveIII. Infant Attachment Classifications- Strange Situation Procedure: standardized procedure for assessing differences in infant attachmento Method: series of stressful separations from caregiver then reunions. Measure infant behavior on reunion - Secure: uses parent as base of exploration, uses parent as safe haven, acknowledges caregiver on return, reciprocal relationship with parent-- Insecure-Avoidant: do not use parent as base/haven, avoid parent upon return- Insecure-Resistant: do not use parent as base/haven, no exploration before separation, unable to be settled by parent upon return- Disorganized: confused/contradictory behavior, may exhibit fear of parentLecture 19- Adult AttachmentI. Adult Attachment Classifications- Use interviews to determine attachmento Interviews coded for coherenceo Semi-structured interviews: about how you talk about them, not what you say- Secure/Autonomous: balanced and coherent narrative about early experiences, regardless of whether described as positive or negative- Insecure-dismissing: distanced from emotional content of the interview. Idealize caregivers or normalize harsh experienceso Dismissing adults experiment Method: administer interview while recording electrodermal response Results: dismissing adults showed largest increase in electrodermal reactivity - Insecure-preoccupied: enmeshed/entangled in past experiences- Insecure adults are unresolved with respect to loss/abuseo Refer to slides for example interviews Answers: dismissing, preoccupied, secure- Fonagy experiment o Method: interview when moms were pregnant, strange situation when babies were oneo Results: 75% of time interview predicted infant attachment classificationsII. Mechanisms of Intergenerational Transmission of Attachment- Caregiving sensitivity partially accounts for intergenerational transmission of attachment- Shared genes- adoptive study showed infant attachment was more similar to adoptive mother’s attachment than biological mother’s o Shared genes are not the cause- Attachment: bio-behavioral stress regulatory systemIII. Adult Attachment and Responding to Infant Distress and Non-Distress- Infant Distress/non-distress adult reactions experimento Method: listen to infant distress and non-distress, record physiological and behavioral responses, note self-reported emotionso Results: sensitivity associations predate parenting experience- NICHD SECCYDo Method: take mothers’ sensitivity at 6 months, infant attachment at 15 monthso Results: sensitivity to distress is a better predictor of infant attachment than sensitivity to non-distresso Conclusion: adult attachment is more strongly associated with responses to distress, maternal sensitivity to distress is more strongly associated with infant attachment securityLecture 20 and 21- Gender DevelopmentI. Social Learning Theories- Basic assumption: young children learn how to act like a boy or girl- Observational learning: parents, peers, media; traditional gendered-typed models (division of labor in workforce and home)o More time around same gender to observe gendero More attention to same-gender modelso children raised in less conventional families tend to be less gender-typed- Direct teaching: via systematic differences in how parents treat sons and daughters- Criticisms: differences exists, not all due to socializationo Children are born with gender-consistent preferences Toy preference by 12-18moII. Social Cognitive Theories- Kohlberg’s Cognitive Developmental Theoryo Basic claim: children actively acknowledge gender in same way they construct other knowledge about the world1. Gender Identity: 2-3 years, learn you are a member of gender category, don’t know gender is permanent2. Gender Stability: 3-4 years, gender is stable over time; not clear that gender is independent of apperances3. Gender Constancy: 5-7 years, learn that gender is constant across situations Once achieved they can seek out models and learn behavior Imitation of same-gender models is result of cognitive changeo Limitations: gender consistent preferences are there long before kids reach gender constancy- Gender Schema Theoryo Gender self-socialization: motivation towards gender-consistent behavior means more knowledge of own gendero Identify own gender at 3 and begin to learno Gender schemas: memory of all you know of two genders, are dynamico Start simple (in-group, out-group) then build on it Kids remember what they see same-gender doing better, more likely to encode events accurately when it is gender-consistentIII. Evolutionary Theories- Evolutionary view assumes: differences between genders are selected because of adaptive advantage and mate selection- Females contribute more to


View Full Document
Download Final Exam Study Guide
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view Final Exam Study Guide and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view Final Exam Study Guide 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?