UW-Madison SOCWORK 453 - Harm Reduction (7 pages)

Previewing pages 1, 2 of 7 page document View the full content.
View Full Document

Harm Reduction



Previewing pages 1, 2 of actual document.

View the full content.
View Full Document
View Full Document

Harm Reduction

244 views

A lecture about harm reduction and implements of it in society today.


Lecture number:
22
Pages:
7
Type:
Lecture Note
School:
University of Wisconsin, Madison
Course:
Socwork 453 - Alcohol and Other Drug Abuse
Edition:
1
Unformatted text preview:

Soc Work 453 Edition 1nd Lecture 22 Outline of Last Lecture I Announcements II Mutual help groups for addiction III Alcoholics Anonymous and Narcotics Anonymous IV IClicker and notes V Spirituality and religion VI Other 12 step programs VII What is recovery Outline of Current Lecture II Announcements III Recovery Follow Up IV IClicker V Harm reduction A pragmatic approach VI Replacement therapies as harm reduction VII Abstinence versus reduced drinking VIII Opiate Overdose Prevention IX Needle exchange Infectious disease prevention X Housing First not contingent on sobriety Current Lecture Announcements Study guide will be released Friday evening Handouts have been posted to Learn UW for prior lectures Two handouts updated Public health and health disparities stigma Tuesday will be all review day and then there will be answers to the handouts Recovery Follow Up Can someone be in recovery if they are still drinking or using Many people who use drugs have a drug of choice If someone is really addicted to one drug and they stop using it and still use something else will they be considered to be in recovery Still could consider someone who is on methadone or other replacement therapies this is still using something but it is not the drug Should this count as recovery What about someone who was previously on heroin and now smokes marijuana occasionally does this count as recovery To be recovered from one addiction must you stop using all other types of psychoactive substances Current Consensus Someone who has been addicted to alcohol now prescribed drugs for pain this is considered to be recovery On the flip slide if someone was addicted to drugs or alcohol and they stop using and they are abstinent but they still drink in moderation they are not considered to be in recovery Recovery is still something that is being defined Stable living environments Halfway houses structured living environments e g testing duties restrictions and privileges employment Sober living houses Informal arrangements often with friends who meet in treatment or 12 step programs These are the halfway houses that have to do with people who have had drug problems not the prison halfway houses o Halfway houses are restricted environments these can be compared to sober living houses Sober living houses are less restrictive it is for people who want to live in an environment where drugs are not the focus There aren t a lot of restrictions imposed on those people They are more about establishing community for people People make friends in the treatment programs and they end up talking to each other about getting a place to live together so they are crafty in ways to come up with living arrangements that don t expose them to substance use Phases of recovery Early sobriety 30 days to 1 year Relapse risk decreases exponentially throughout this period Sustained sobriety 1 to 5 years Stable sobriety 5 years Stable sobriety doesn t mean cravings are going to go away Iclicker People who subscribe to the disease model of addiction tend to think that harm reduction is unacceptable because and the only accepted means of overcoming addiction is A addiction has no cure abstinence Harm reduction A pragmatic approach People engage in risky behaviors so let s try to reduce the consequences Harm reduction philosophy can be applied to policies public health interventions and treatments How can be minimize remove the most destructive harms and costs Also if we can t get people to quit can we modify their level or type of use What are the risks that are modifiable There are certain risks that aren t modifiable Like binge drinking for someone s whole life there are risks that cannot be changed But there are some risks you can do something about harm reduction tries to find risks that are the most impactful on society and tries to change them Most of these programs end up decreasing the costs to society like accidents in the ER drunk driving etc Harm reduction programs end up saving a ton of money Huge focus on improving public health and decreasing costs associated with addiction If people are going to use drugs and need a symbolic mediator can we convince people to use drugs that aren t as harmful Or have people drink less It s practical because it realizes that abstinence although it s a great goal for a lot of people it isn t achievable by other people Replacement therapies as harm reduction Methadone maintenance eCigs vs cigarettes Legalization debate Cannabis vs opiates This is a realization that a person may not be able to get over their addiction so this replacement therapy means that the person can still use the drug but it will not be as destructive to society Some replacement therapies have risks and can increase your addiction this is one thing to think about Are these replacement therapies more helpful But maybe they are It is an open question right now We would need to randomize people to receive eCigs as a replacement therapy and see what happens to costs and outcome Legalization debate may think about one society cost associated with cannabis being criminalized is very expensive incarceration costs What do we use for pain relief Opiates Vicodin Oxycontin Marijuana works for pain and it is less addictive and less harmful would it be better to have people switch to marijuana for pain This is an open question From the harm reduction perspective cannabis could be introducing new risks like lung problems but it doesn t have to be smoked What would make us more likely to want to see a treatment professional who was open to us reducing our use of alcohol drugs than one who was only open to complete abstinence Progression it is obvious that if people stop at least some substances that would be a better situation then nothing at all Countless people say that they are scared to imagine completely stopping using If you have a wife or job if you don t have abstinence it could be bad It could be a situation where they need to totally stop Social pressures can be pretty effective at least in some regards Abstinence versus reduced drinking Traditionally treatment programs have required abstinence as the ultimate goal of treatment In a recent survey of treatment professionals about 50 accepted reduced use as an acceptable goal Would more people enter treatment if reduced use were a broadly acceptable goal Before people were turned away if they did not have the goal of complete abstinence It is possible to find treatment professionals


View Full Document

Access the best Study Guides, Lecture Notes and Practice Exams

Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view Harm Reduction and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view Harm Reduction and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?