Unformatted text preview:

1Labeled Optical Burst Switchingand IP/WDM IntegrationChunming Qiao2OVERVIEW– Introduction to IP/WDM– Optical Switching ParadigmsCircuit or Packet Switching?– Optical Burst Switching (OBS)3Just In Case ...• IP: Internet Protocol– not Intellectual Property• ATM: Asynchronous Transfer Mode – not Automatic Teller Machine• SONET: Synchronous Optical NETwork– not as in son et (lumiere) • WDM: Wavelength Division Multiplexing– or Wha’Daya Mean ?4Network Architectures• today: IP over (ATM/SONET) over WDM• trend: Integrated IP/WDM (with optical switching)• goal: ubiquitous, scalable and future-proof5IP / ATM / SONET / WDMIPATMSONETWDM6SONET/SDH• standard for TDM transmissions over fibers– basic rate of OC-3 (155 Mbps) based on 64 kbps PCM channels (primarily voice traffic)– expensive electronic Add-Drop Muxers (ADM) @ OC-192 (or 10 Gbps) and above– many functions not necessary/meaningful for data traffic (e.g., bidirectional/symmetric links)– use predominantly rings: not BW efficient, but quick protection/restoration (<= 50 ms)7Internet Protocol (IP)• main functions– break data (email, file) into (IP) packets– add network (IP) addresses to each packet– figure out the (current) topology and maintains a routing table at each router – find a match for the destination address of a packet, and forward it to the next hop• a link to a popular server site may be congested8Asynchronous Transfer Mode• break data (e.g., an IP packet) into smaller ATM cells, each having 48+5 = 53 bytes• a route from point A to point B needs be pre-established before sending cells.• support Quality-of-Service (QoS), e.g., bounded delay, jitter and cell loss rate• basic rate: between 155 and 622 Mbps– just start to talk 10 Gbps (too late?)9Data Traffic Growth• double every 4 (up to 12) months or so, and will increase by 1,000 times in 5 years – at least 10 x increase in users, and uses per user– at least 100 x increase in BW per use: • current web pages contain 10 KB each• MP3 & MPEG files are 5 & 40 MB each, resp.• beat Moore’s Law (growth rate in electronic processing power)– electronic processing, switching, and transmission cannot and will not keep up – need WDM transmissions and switching10Wavelength Division Multiplex• up to 50 THz (or about 50 Tbps) per fiber (low loss range is now 1335nm to 1625nm) • mature WDM components– mux/demux, amplifier (EDFA), transceiver (fixed-tuned), add-drop mux, static λ-router,• still developing – tunable transceiver, all-optical λ-conversion and cross-connect/switches, Raman amplifiers11WDM Pt-2-Pt Transmission?1?2?n?1?2?nMUX DEMUXEDFA EDFAfiber12Advance in WDM Networking• Transmission (long haul)– 80 λs (1530nm to 1565nm) now, and additional 80 λs(1570nm to 1610nm) soon– OC-48 (2.5 Gbps) per λ (separated by 0.4 nm) and OC-192 (separated by 0.8 nm)– 40 Gbps per λ also coming (>1 Tbps per fiber)• Cross-connecting and Switching– Up to 1000 x 1000 optical cross-connects (MEMS)– 64 x 64 packet-switches (switching time < 1 ns)13ATM and SONET: Legacy• interest in ATM diminished – a high cell tax, and segmentation/re-assembly and signaling overhead– failed to reach desktops (& take over the world)– on-going effort in providing QoS by IP (e.g., IPv6 & Multi-protocol Label Switching or MPLS)• SONET/SDH more expensive than WDM – & IP & WDM can jointly provide satisficatoryprotection/restoration (< 99.999% reliability?)14Datagram (IP) or VC (ATM) • datagram-based packet switching– next-hop determined for each packet based on destination address and (current) routing table• IP finds a longest sub-string match (a complex op)• virtual circuit (VC)-based packet-switching– determines the path (VC) to take before-hand • entry at each node: [VCI -in, next-hop, VCI-out]– assigns packets a VCI (e.g., Rt. 66 )15Benefit of VC (as in ATM)• faster and more efficient forwarding– an exact match is quicker to find than a longest sub-string match• facilitates traffic engineering– paths can be explicitly specified for achieving e.g., network-wide load-balance– packets with the same destination address (but different VCI’s) can now be treated differently16IP-over-ATM• IP routers interconnected via ATM switches• breaks each packet into cells for switching• a flow: consecutive packets with the same source/destination (domain/host/TCP conn.)• Multi-protocol over ATM (MPOA)– ATM-specific signaling to establish an ATM VC between source/destination IP routers– segmentation and re-assembly overhead17IP-centric Control• Tag Switching (centralized, control-driven)– the network sets up end-to-end VC’s– each packet carries a tag (e.g., VCI)• IP Switching (distributed, data-driven)– first few packets are routed at every IP router• up to a threshold value to filter out short “flows”– following packets bypass intermediate routers via a VC (established in a hop-by-hop fashion).18MPLS (Overview)• A control plane integrating network-layer (routing) and data-link layer (switching)– packet-switched networks with VC’s• LSP: label switched path (VC’s)– identified with a sequence of labels (tag/VCI) – set up between label switched routers (LSRs) • Each packet is augmented with a shim containing a label, and switched over a LSP19IP over WDM Architectures• IP routers interconnected with WDM links– with or without built-in WDM transceivers• An optical cloud (core) accessed by IP routers at the edge– pros: provide fat and easy-to-provision pipes – either transparent (i.e., OOO) or opaque (i.e., O-E-O) cross-connects (circuit-switches)– proprietary control and non-IP based routing20Optical/Photonic (OOO) Switching• Pros:– can handle a huge amount of through-traffic – synergetic to optical transmission (no O/E/O)– transparency (bit-rate, format, protocol)• caveats– optical 3R/performance monitoring are hard– more mature/reliable opaque (OEO) switches – SONET or GbE like framing still useful21Emerging Integrated IP/WDM• IP and MPLS on top of every optical circuit or packet switch :– IP-based addressing/routing (electronics), but data is optically switched (circuit or packet)– MPLS-based provisioning, traffic engineering and protection/restoration– internetworking of optical WDM subnets • with interior and exterior (border) gateway routing22Why IP over WDM• IP: the unifying/convergence


View Full Document

UB CSE 620 - Labeled Optical Burst Switching

Download Labeled Optical Burst Switching
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view Labeled Optical Burst Switching and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view Labeled Optical Burst Switching 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?