DOC PREVIEW
UW-Madison BME 300 - Augmentative Communication Device

This preview shows page 1-2-20-21 out of 21 pages.

Save
View full document
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 21 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 21 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 21 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 21 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 21 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

Augmentative Communication DevicePresentation OverviewI. Background InformationII. Problem StatementIII. Client RequirementsIV. User CharacteristicsExampleV. Existing Devices: TangoExisting Devices: DasherExisting Devices: DynaVox PalmtopExiting Devices: DynaVox DV4Existing Devices: DynaVox EyeMaxCommon Problems with Existing TechnologiesVI. Design AlternativesTouch Screen - Palm Pilot AlphabetTouch Screen - Phonetic AlphabetKaossilator Pad with TalkboxKaossilator DemonstrationVI. Design MatrixVII. Future WorkQuestions?Augmentative Communication DeviceClient: Dr. Lawrence KaplanAdvisor: Prof. Brenda OgleGroup Members (in order of appearance):Steve Wyche (BSAC), Erin Devine (Communication),Brian Mogen (Leader),Prachi Agarwal (BWIG)Presentation OverviewI. Background InformationII. Problem StatementIII. Client RequirementsIV. User CharacteristicsV. Existing TechnologyVI. Design AlternativesVII. Design MatrixVIII. Final Design and Future WorkI. Background InformationPatients with considerable neuromotor disabilites–Cerebral palsyDifficulties speakingCauses frustrationCurrent technology not desirableLong-time ambition for improved devicehttp://img.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2007/10_01/KThorpeEastNews0710_468x726.jpgII. Problem StatementTo design a device that allows people with communicative disabilities but motor functions to speak and express emotion with their voice. The device must provide immediate output, and it must be intuitive and accurate.III. Client RequirementsDevice for those who cannot speakPhonetics basedFaster, more expressive means of communication“Bridge the gap” for people with difficulty speakingIV. User CharacteristicsCerebral PalsyLiterateNormal cognitive functionDifficulty with oromotor controlDifficulty with fine motor controlParalyzed diaphragmPossibly wheelchair-boundMany different levels of the severity of disabilityExamplehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1xrMCutzHzEV. Existing Devices: TangoGeared towards childrenLimited to pre-programmed phrasesUses pictures, icons and wordsExisting Devices: DasherA pointer chooses a letter, the program predicts the next letterInterface for those who cannot use a standard keyboardComplicatedSlowExisting Devices: DynaVox PalmtopSmall, compactLimited vocabularyLimited emotional expressionSlowExiting Devices: DynaVox DV4Tablet PC with touch screenSlowLimited quick vocabularyNo emotional expressionExisting Devices: DynaVox EyeMaxFaster, adaptive interfaceWorks for a variety of disabilitiesNo emotional expressionCommon Problems with Existing TechnologiesSlowUsers feel unintelligent –Can’t always keep up with conversation Lack emotional expressionExpensive–Not used oftenVI. Design AlternativesTouch Screen - Palm Pilot AlphabetTouch Screen - Phonetic AlphabetKaossilator Pad with TalkboxTouch Screen - Palm Pilot AlphabetLetter-basedAbbreviatedLimited motor skillhttp://www.computerhope.com/help/pp1.gifTouch Screen - Phonetic Alphabet244 soundsOutputNo need for literacy http://www.cardinalsystems.net/help/TouchScreen_image004.jpgKaossilator Pad with TalkboxUser controlledInstantNo buttonsCapable of inflectionIntuitivehttp://s203.photobucket.com/albums/aa47/raf_fiol/kompoz/?action=view&current=banshee.jpghttp://www.beatportal.com/uploads/news/kaoscillator.jpgKaossilator Demonstrationhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aeQOuNBuJwgVI. Design MatrixVII. Future Work Building Prototype:TestingReduce weightIntegrate system Talk boxKaossilatorFrom speaker outPatient’s mouthMid range horn driverInput from


View Full Document

UW-Madison BME 300 - Augmentative Communication Device

Documents in this Course
Load more
Download Augmentative Communication Device
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view Augmentative Communication Device and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view Augmentative Communication Device 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?