DOC PREVIEW
MIT 18 01 - The Two Fundamental Theorems of Calculus

This preview shows page 1-2-3 out of 8 pages.

Save
View full document
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 8 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 8 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 8 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 8 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

MIT OpenCourseWare http://ocw.mit.edu 18.01 Single Variable CalculusFall 2006 For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use, visit: http://ocw.mit.edu/terms.FT. SECOND FUNDAMENTAL THEOREM 1. The Two Fundamental Theorems of Calculus The Fundamental Theorem of Calculus really consists of two closely related theorems, usually called nowadays (not very imaginatively) the First and Second Fundamental Theo-rems. Of the two, it is the First Fundamental Theorem that is the familiar one used all the time. It is the theorem that tells you how to evaluate a definite integral without having to go back to its definition as the limit of a sum of rectangles. First Fundamental Theorem Let f(x) be continuous on [a, b]. Suppose there is a function F(x) such that f(x) = F'(x) . Then b b (1) f f()dx F(b) F(a). =) = -F(x) (The last equality just gives another way of writing F(b) -F(a)that is in widespread use.) Still another way of writing the theorem is to observe that F(x) is an antiderivative for f(x), or as it-is sometimes called, an indefinite integral for f(x); using the standard notation for indefinite integral and the bracket notation given above, the theorem would be written (1') f (x) dx = f (x)d . Writing the theorem this way makes it look sort of catchy, and more importantly, it avoids having to introduce the new symbol F(x) for the antiderivative. In contrast with the above theorem, which every calculus student knows, the Second Fundamental Theorem is more obscure and seems less useful. The purpose of this chapter is to explain it, show its use and importance, and to show how the two theorems are related. To start things off, here it is. Second Fundamental Theorem. Let f(x) be continuous, andfix a. (2) Set F() = f (t)dt; then F'(x) = f(x). We begin by interpreting (2) geometrically. Start with the graph of f(t) in the ty-plane. Then F(x) represents the area under f(t) between a and x; it is a function' of x. Its derivative -the rate of change of area with respect to x -is the length of the dark vertical line. This is what (2) says e met.ricrnll ISimmons calls this function A(x) on p. 207 (2nd edition); this section of Simmons is another presentation of much of the material given here.Example 1. Verify (2) if f(x) = 2xsin 2 and a= 0. Solution. Here we can integrate explicitly by finding an antiderivative (using the first fundamental theorem): F(W) = 2tsintdt -cos t2 -cosx + 1; differentiating by the chain rule, we verify that indeed F'(x) = 2zsinx 2, as predicted by (2). O *Example2. Let F(z) = Ssint dt. Find F'(7r/2). Solution. Neither integration techniques nor integral tables will produce an explicit antiderivative for the function in the integrand. So we cannot use (1). But we can use (2), which says that sin 7r/2 1F'(R/2) = i/2 /2 Many students feel the Second Fundamental Theorem is "obvious"; these students are confusing it with the similar-looking (2') Let F(x) = f f(x) dx; then F'(x) = f(x). Indeed, (2') is obvious. The "integral" in it is an indefinite integral, i.e., an antiderivative. So what (2') says is: "Let F(x) be an antiderivative for f (x); then F(x) is an antiderivative for f(x) -a true statement, but not a very exciting one (logicians call it a tautology.) The Second Fundamental Theorem (2) looks almost the same as (2'), but it is actually entirely different, because F(x) is defined as a definite integral. The next section, which continues the discussion, should help show the difference. 2. Do functions have antiderivatives? The First Fundamental Theorem tells us how to calculate f(x) dx by finding an anti-derivative for f(x). But the theorem isn't so useful if you can't find an antiderivative. Most calculus students think for example that e'-has no antiderivative -"the integral isn't in the tables", "it can't be integrated" are some of the ways they express this. Even for a simple function like 11-, it is not obvious what the antiderivative is. Perhaps it doesn't have any? The Second Fundamental Theorem provides the answer; it says: Every contiziuous function f(x) has an antoiderivative: f(t)dt. The antiderivative may not be expressible in terms of elementary functions -this is the difficulty with e-"2 -but it always exists.FT. THE SECOND FUNDAMENTAL THEOREM Example 3. Find an antiderivative for 1 Solution. This doesn't look so easy to do explicitly. But the Second Fundamental Theorem says the following function is an antiderivative: (3) .. F(z).-dt Discussion. You may feel that this doesn't represent progress: the formula for the antiderivative is useless. But that's not so: the function F(z) can be calculated by numerical integration. It can be programmed into a calculator so that when you press an z-value, the screen will display the corresponding value of F(z) to 12 decimal digits. Pressing another button will draw the graph of F(z) over any interval on the z-axis that you specify. Repeating what we said earlier, the integral in (3) should be carefully distinguished from dz -this "integral" is just another notation for the antiderivative, and is therefore not a solution to the problem. The integral in (3) by contrast is a perfectly definite function, and it does solve the problem of finding an antiderivative.. In this case, it turns out that F(z) does have an expression in terms of elementary functions. It is (4) F(z) = (f+ 1)3/8-4(v +1)1' -3 3 (You can prove this is correct by differentiating it; the 8/3 is put in to ensure that F(O) = 0, as definition (3)requires.) The above way of writing F(z) is different from (3). Whether or not it is a better way depends on what you want to know about F(.) and what use you want to make of it. For instance, Is F(z) > 0 when z > 07 The answer is clearly "yes" if we look at the integral (3), since the integrand is positive; it is not at all clear what the answer is if instead we look at (4), because of the -sign. As .another example, what is F'(z) ? From (3) the answer is immediate, whereas from (4) you would have to calculate for a while -as you will know if you took the trouble to check its correctnessl3. Defining new functions: In(x) and erf(x). One important use of the Second Fundamental Theorem is to define new functions. Cal-culus can then be used to study their properties. To illustrate, we consider first an old function: Inz.Let's pretend we know nothing of logarithms. We do know that SXd = n+l' no-1 . However, we know no explicit formula for an antiderivative of 1/x, i.e., when n = -1.


View Full Document

MIT 18 01 - The Two Fundamental Theorems of Calculus

Documents in this Course
Graphing

Graphing

46 pages

Exam 2

Exam 2

3 pages

Load more
Download The Two Fundamental Theorems of Calculus
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view The Two Fundamental Theorems of Calculus and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view The Two Fundamental Theorems of Calculus 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?