DOC PREVIEW
Cal Poly STAT 217 - Topics in Regression

This preview shows page 1-2-3-4 out of 11 pages.

Save
View full document
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 11 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 11 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 11 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 11 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 11 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

Stat 217 – Day 27Last Time – Inference for RegressionExample 2: Textbook pricesExample 1: Gesell dataSlide 5Slide 6In factSlide 8Influential ObservationsExample 2: FEVSlide 11Stat 217 – Day 27Topics in RegressionLast Time – Inference for RegressionHo: no association or  =0Ha: is an/positive/negative associationMinitab outputt test statistic from “coefficient of x” rowtwo-sided p-valueSE(b) = amount of random variation of slopes from sample to sampleStrength of evidence (p-value) vs. strength of association (r)P. 605Example 2: Textbook pricesThe relationship between textbook price and number of pages appears stronger than between textbook prices and year of pub.Every time the pages are increased by one the predicted price will increase by $.147.The p-value is 0.000 (t = 7.65) so I would reject the null hypothesis. Strong evidence there is an association between pages in textbook and price (in the population).Example 1: Gesell dataCan we predict later intelligence based on when the child first speaks?Removing the one child has a pretty big impact on the regression line, significance Example 1: Gesell dataExample 1: Gesell dataBest conclusion?Some evidence that children who take a particularly long time to speak may have lower IQ scores, but otherwise no relationship between age of first words and later IQ.For children who take between 5 and 20 months, no relationship…In fact42 months and Gesell = 120Regression line follows that one child!Example 1: Gesell data15 months and Gesell = 57Influential ObservationsObservations whose removal has a dramatic impact on the regression line (or p-value or correlation coefficient)Most likely candidates – extreme x valuesExample 2: FEVTo Turn in with partnerFor WednesdayLab 9Start bringing review questions(Thursday in lab – case study type


View Full Document

Cal Poly STAT 217 - Topics in Regression

Download Topics in Regression
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view Topics in Regression and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view Topics in Regression 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?