DOC PREVIEW
U of M CE 5212 - Midwest Regional Rail Initiative

This preview shows page 1-2-3-25-26-27 out of 27 pages.

Save
View full document
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 27 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 27 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 27 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 27 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 27 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 27 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 27 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

Midwest High SpeedRailCase Study September 29th,2004AndyInserra,KristinThompson,T.J.Thurlow,NatalieVillwockMidwest Regional RailInitiative (MWRRI)Began in 1996 among9 Midwest states:•Indiana•Illinois•Iowa•Michigan•Minnesota•Missouri•Nebraska•Ohio•WisconsinGeneral Data• Trainswilloperateatspeedsupto110mph• Willconvert3000milesofexistingrail• Faresestimatedtobe50%higherthanexistingAmtrakfares• Feederbussystemwillhelpincreaseaccessibility• Estimatedcost:$4.1billionGoals for High SpeedRail• Shortertraveltimes• Morefrequenttraintrips• Increasedconnectionsbetweenurbanandruralcommunities• ImprovedreliabilityChicago to Twin Cities•Intermediate stops – Milwaukee, Madison, LaCrosse•Chicago terminal – Chicago Union Station•Twin Cities terminal – St Paul Union Station•Possible continuation of service to Minneapolis downtown station Mpls station is proposed for Rapid Park area joined with the Northstar Commuter Rail stationRoute to the Twin CitiesBus ConnectionsBus ConnectionsCoach bus service to smaller cities to bring riders to the stationsCities proposed to be served by bus•Mankato•Duluth-Superior•Eau Claire•Rhinelander •Wausau•EscanabaTwin Cities Transit connectionsTwin Cities Transit connections•St Paul Union Station•Metro Transit •Central LRT•Red Rock Commuter Rail•Minneapolis•Hiawatha LRT•Metro Transit•Southwest LRT•Northstar Commuter Rail•Currently in Service•Proposed ServiceWisconsin Transit connectionsWisconsin Transit connectionsMadisonMadisonMetro Transit SystemMetro Transit SystemMilwaukeeMilwaukeeMilwaukee County TransitMilwaukee County TransitLaCrosseLaCrosseLaCrosse TransitLaCrosse TransitChicago Transit connectionsChicago Transit connectionsChicago Union Station•Metra•CTA Subway•CTA Bus•Walking distance to the Loop•Possible shuttles to •Oligvie Station•Randolph St Station•LaSalle St StationComparison• MidwestRegionalRailInitiative• AmtrakCascade(NorthwestPassengerSystem)• DifferencesandSimilaritiesDifferences• CascadesownedbyAmtrak– Scheduling– TicketSales– Promotion– Infrastructure– TrackusageDifferences cont.• Stops/Stations– Cascadesmanystops– MajorcitiesinMidwestplan.• Tracks– Cascadeshasoneroute– MidwestisanetworkconnectingdistributionofcitiesSimilarities• Funding– Stateandlocalfunding• StateDOT– MajorimprovementtotracksandhighwayoverpassespaidforbyDOTandFederalGrants– MidwestdecidingboardwouldprobablyhaverepresentativesfromeachstateDOTandalsocityrepslocationsofstations.• TicketSales– MidwestSystemclaimstobeabletopayforsystemcostswithticketsales.Similarities cont.• Track– Cascadesimprovingtracksfor110mphserviceby2015– Midwesthassimilarplan• Upgradeexistingtrack.Conclusions• Overallbothsystemsverysimilar• DifferencesinMidwestmakesitmorechallengingtodesignandinitiate.• Cascadeasuccessfulsystemthatcouldbemodeledafter.Advantages• CleanerEnvironment• Efficiency• Economicbenefitsofstationrevitalization• Fills“tooshorttofly,toolongtodrive”transportationgapCleaner Environment• Lessairpollution• Betterfuelefficiency– Chicago-St.Louiscorridorcouldsave6.5milliongallonsoffuelin2010Efficiency• Lowerconstructioncost– Upgradedtrackis6-7timescheaperthanbuildinghighway• Betterlanduse– Railrequires10%theamountoflandasInterstatehighwaysEconomic Benefits ofStation Revitalization• Increasedpassengervolumes• Increasedemployment• Slowgrowthofautocongestion• IncreasedpropertyvaluesnearrevitalizedstationsFills TransportationGap• Canbefasterthanflyingfortripsofafewhundredmiles• Saferandmoreproductivethandrivingformid-distancetripsDisadvantages• Unclearwherecostburdenwillfall• Highusercosts• Projectionsvs.realityWho Will Pay?• Supportersclaimthatticketsaleswillcoveroperatingandmaintenancecosts• Currentrailnetwork(Amtrak)loses$20perticketHigh User Costs• EstimatedSt.PaultoMadisonone-wayfareis$83• Planefareforthesamedistance,round-trip,isoftenaslowas$120• ThoseaccustomedtodrivingmaynotbewillingtopaythatmuchforaddedconvenienceorproductivityProponents• CityandCountygovernmentsalongproposedroutes• Railroad,transit,andothernon-profitgroups• Newspapers(includingStarTribune)• ChambersofCommerce• EnvironmentalAssociationsOpponents• Somecitizensconcernedaboutnoise,safety,andpropertyvalues• CongressmanRayLaHoodofIL“aMidwestrailpassengersystemoffersthehighestlevelofeconomicbenefitassociatedwithrailinvestmentanywhereintheU.S.exceptforAmtrak’ sNortheastCorridor”http://www.dot.state.mn.us/passengerrail/onepagers/midwest.html#mwmapQuestions forDiscussion• Whoisthetargetrider?• Whodoyouthinkaretheopponentsofthisproject?• WhereshouldthehighspeedtrainstopintheMidwest?• Woulditbepositiveornegativetodesignforhigherspeeds?•


View Full Document

U of M CE 5212 - Midwest Regional Rail Initiative

Documents in this Course
Ethanol

Ethanol

32 pages

History

History

41 pages

Case

Case

13 pages

Load more
Download Midwest Regional Rail Initiative
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view Midwest Regional Rail Initiative and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view Midwest Regional Rail Initiative 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?