DOC PREVIEW
Stanford STS 145 - Nintendo 64 versus Sony PlayStation

This preview shows page 1-2-20-21 out of 21 pages.

Save
View full document
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 21 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 21 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 21 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 21 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 21 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

Johnson 1 Stephanie Johnson 3/18/03 STS 145: Case Study Nintendo 64 versus Sony PlayStation: The Cartridge/CD-ROM Battle "By 1995, Nintendo would be the only major video game company that did not have a CD-based game system" (Kent 453). How did Nintendo, the company that headed the computer-game renaissance of the 1980s, later seem to fall behind the times when so many other companies, most importantly Sony Corporation, were capitalizing on the technological advances of CDs? This case study is an examination of two types of game data storage, Nintendo's cartridge format and Sony's CD-ROMs, and the factors that led to Nintendo's release of the cartridge-based Nintendo 64 when consoles of the same generation were becoming increasingly CD-based. The Nintendo 64's main competitor was the Sony PlayStation, a CD-ROM-based console that actually evolved out of a joint CD project between Nintendo and Sony. But after the project was dissolved, Nintendo reverted back to focusing on cartridge-based consoles. The company's decision was largely the result of a business strategy that was (and still is) so strongly focused on control that, unlike Sony, Nintendo was unable to embrace technological advances, while Sony was able to recognize CDs as the format of the future and capitalize on their advantages. Nintendo Ltd., a Japanese gaming company that had originated as a non-computer-based toy company, released its third-generation console, the Nintendo 64, in 1996 for $199 ("What's in the Box?," par. 1). The console used cartridges, rectangular storage devices with ROM chips (semi-conductor memory) and 64-bit processors (Asakura 93). The president of Nintendo at the time, Hiroshi Yamauchi, played a significant role in the Nintendo 64's development and the decision to stick with the cartridge format. Sony's first game console, of the same generation asJohnson 2 the Nintendo 64, was the CD-ROM-based PlayStation, released in 1995 for $299 (Kent 532). In contrast to cartridges, CD-ROMs are a type of optical media that uses lasers to store and retrieve information. They can therefore contain up to 650 megabytes of data (Rojas 139) compared to the 64 megabytes on a Nintendo 64 cartridge. CDs were invented as early as the mid-1970s but were prone to reading errors; audio CDs did not become prevalent until Sony and a European company called Philips N.V. independently pioneered their versions in 1982 (Rojas 140). The chairman of Sony during the development of the PlayStation was Norio Ohga, but the man who was truly responsible for the console was a young engineer named Ken Kutaragi. The origin of the interchangeable cartridge system is disputed but it marked a break from the earlier forms of video game consoles, called hardwired machines, which could play only one game each. Author Steven Kent cites Fairchild Camera and Instrument, which released the Channel F video game console in 1976, as the first company to utilize interchangeable cartridges called "Videocarts." Instead of having to buy a new console for every game, consumers could purchase one console and then insert different Videocarts that contained information for separate games. Kent argues that although "the Channel F never developed a large following, it changed the consumer market forever. Consumers no longer wanted single-game consoles" but rather one console that could play many games (98). Fairchild's console was revolutionary in that it changed the standard format of home consoles entirely. Arnie Katz and Laurie Yates, on the other hand, recognize an older console, the Magnavox Odyssey, as the first to have truly individual game cartridges. Released in 1972, the Odyssey is considered by some to be the very first video game console (Shaun). But, "like almost every game console since," Katz and Yates assert, "the Odyssey was an underpowered machine without many features. ... [It] was ... saddled with very limited capabilities thatJohnson 3 circumscribed cartridge design throughout the system's several-year lifespan;" for example, it had such limited memory that the cartridge could not even store data for a playing field, so "every Odyssey game included a plastic overlay that adhered to the TV screen during play" (11). But despite the restricted state of cartridge technology at the time, cartridges were obviously superior to hardwired units, providing much more flexibility at a lower retail price than hardwired machines (Katz and Yates 12). Although other companies, recognizing cartridges' advantages, attempted to make use of them as well, only Magnavox and later another company called Atari managed to produce successful consoles with interchangeable units in the 1970s. Eventually the effects of third-party companies led to the dominance of the Atari console over the Odyssey, and Atari took the lead of the industry (Katz and Yates 19). Then in 1984 the United States console industry crashed. Major companies, most notably Atari, had lost control over the games that were being produced for their consoles, and as a result the market was flooded with low-quality games that destroyed the companies' respectability. Most of the cartridge companies went bankrupt, and since the home computer industry did not experience a similarly devastating crash, the computer game industry shifted to focus on PC games. Consoles were considered a dead market, and the disk (either floppy or compact) overtook the cartridge as the primary game storage medium (Katz and Yates 37-8). However, the console market in Japan never really died out. Undaunted by gloomy forecasts of the industry's death, in 1984 Nintendo Ltd., formerly a distributor of card games and other toys, released the cartridge-based Family Computer System, or Famicom, in Japan. In 1985, only one year after the crash of the U.S. market, it released the Famicom as the Nintendo Entertainment System, or NES, in the United States. However, recognizing the generally pessimistic attitude towards game consoles, Nintendo marketed the NES as a robot-toy, not aJohnson 4 gaming unit, by inventing a robot-like peripheral that interacted with the console. The robot was only a gimmick, though, and soon faded from the market, while the NES and its games became immensely popular (Katz and Yates 53-4). With the success of the NES Nintendo revived the market of video games and firmly established the cartridge as the primary medium for data storage of home-console games. The


View Full Document

Stanford STS 145 - Nintendo 64 versus Sony PlayStation

Documents in this Course
Load more
Download Nintendo 64 versus Sony PlayStation
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view Nintendo 64 versus Sony PlayStation and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view Nintendo 64 versus Sony PlayStation 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?