Team Name: ____________________ Evaluator: ____________________ Aersp 401A Final Report Scoring Form Scoring Criteria stated clearly, completely 2 stated vaguely or incompletely 1 not stated 0 motivation primary objective(s) key mission rqts. mission architecture overall mass, cost, and power rqts Scoring Criteria identifies specific technical approach(es) or key unresolved questions 2 mentions subsystem, but omits specifics 1 Subsystems: omits subsystem 0 Structure L/V Propulsion Ground ctrl Comm. C&DH GNC Pwr TCS ECLSS (if applicable) Sci. instrum./other payloads Scoring Criteria stated clearly, completely 2 stated vaguely or incompletely 1 not stated 0 Abstract summarizes: remaining work for next semester motivation primary objective(s) secondary objective(s) Introduction design level being reported overview of the mission (describes how mission will be accomplished) 4 describes sequence of events 4 includes a graphical timeline 4 includes mission scenario cartoon(s) 4 Mission architecture includes vehicle config, drawing(s) 4 (OVER)Scoring Criteria Requirements Clearly ties rqts to this mission (derived from objectives) 2 States rqts but does not clearly tie them to mission 1 rqts not stated 0 Decisions decisions meet rqts (or unresolved problems are described) 2 decisions not clearly tied to rqts 1 decisions not stated (or unresolved problems not stated) 0 Justification strong justification 2 weak justification 1 no justification 0 rqts decisions/problems Structure justifications rqts decisions/problems L/V justifications rqts decisions/problems Propulsion justifications rqts decisions/problems Ground control justifications rqts decisions/problems Comm.. justifications rqts decisions/problems C&DH justifications rqts decisions/problems GNC justifications rqts decisions/problems Pwr justifications rqts decisions/problems TCS justifications rqts decisions/problems ECLSS (if applicable) justifications rqts decisions/problems subsystems Sci. instrum./other payloads justificationsScoring Criteria Includes line item for each subsystem, labels columns, states units 4 Incomplete 1-3 No table 0 Summary table for mass Summary table for power rqts Scoring Criteria States estimation method, parameter values, FY, total cost 4 Incomplete 1-3 No table 0 Summary Tables Summary table for cost Scoring Criteria cites specific task(s) to complete for detailed-level design 2 describes remaining work in general terms 1 does not address future work 0 mission architecture mass estimates power estimates cost estimate subsystems: Structure L/V Propulsion Ground ctrl Comm. C&DH GNC Pwr TCS ECLSS (if applicable) Recommendations for future work Sci. instrum./other payloads (OVER)Scoring Criteria STYLE Support ideas in the text & are referred to in text (all=4, most=3, few=2, none=0) Neatly drawn (all=4, most=3, few=2, none=0) Labels/tags for key features (all=4, most=3, few=2, none=0) Each figure cited in text Figures (all=2, some=1, none=0) Support ideas in the text (all=4, most=3, few=2, none=0) Labels and units: complete /correct (all=4, most=3, few=2, none=0) Each table cited in text Tables (all=2, some=1, none=0) Scoring Criteria citations (refs cited in text) Complete and correct all=4, most=3, few=2, none=0 References list of references Complete and in correct format all=4, most=3, few=2, none=0 lists major section names w/page numbers 3 missing some major sections names/page numbers 2 missing all page numbers 1 TOC no TOC 0 Scoring Criteria all correct 3 a few errors 2 many errors 1 Punctuation Spelling Grammar Rpt follows rqd outline Maintains consistent writing style throughout report completely=3 mostly=2 somewhat=1 Scoring Criteria C* (creativity) (maximum of 5 bonus pts) TOTAL