DOC PREVIEW
MIT 7 014 - From Yeast to Humans—Essential Genes on the Evolutionary Continium

This preview shows page 1 out of 3 pages.

Save
View full document
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 3 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 3 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

MIT Department of Biology 7.014 Introductory Biology, Spring 2005 Recitation Section 22 Answer Key May 2-3, 2005 From Yeast to Humans—Essential Genes on the Evolutionary Continium. A. CBS protein in yeast and humans Recall that earlier in the term we considered the human gene CBS and its yeast analog cys4. Recall that these genes each encode the protein cystathionine β-synthase that is responsible for converting homocysteine into cystathionine in the cellular pathway of creating cysteine. 1. What is cysteine? Is it important for organism’s survival? Cysteine is an amino acid. It is used in production of proteins, and is thus, essential for organism’s survival. However, external supplementation can sometimes alleviate the phenotype associated with inability to make own cysteine. 2. What would you expect to be the result of complete absence of the protein product of the yeast CYS4 gene to be? What about the same question for the human CBS protein? Yeast will not be able to make cysteine, resulting in cysteine auxotrophy. Humans lacking CBS protein should also be unable to make cysteine. Human phenotype may be more complex than just cysteine auxotrophy. 3. Would you expect cells that contain no functional copy of CBS enzyme to accumulate some kind of a compound? If no, why not? If yes, what kind of a compound would you expect that compound to be? These cells should accumulate the compound that is the product of the previous step in the cysteine biosynthesis pathway. The compound is homocysteine, an intermediate in the cycteine biosynthesis pathway and one of the reactants in the step catalyzed by the CBS protein (the other reactant is serine). 4. In the experiments we discussed earlier in the term, what was the phenotype of the cys4 mutants on complete media? On complete media cys4 mutants had the same phenotype as the wild type yeast. 5. As we told you a number of sessions ago, the deficiency in the human analog of CYS4 gene, CBS, lead to a disease called cysteineurea, resulting in variety of serious conditions, including mental retardation, heart attack, and stroke. What accounts for such a big difference in phenotype between CBS protein deficient yeast and humans? The cause of the disease phenotype in humans is the accumulation on homocysteine, the product of the previous step in the cysteine biosynthesis pathway, and a reactant in the step catalyzed by CBS. Yeast cells apparently can either secrete excess homocysteine, or the excess of it within a cell does not interfere with the yeast cellular functions. Humans are a complex system, and the excess of homocysteine in the body leads to a variety of disourders. This is what is known as an emergent property—something we couldn’t have predicted from observing the deficient phenotype in lower organisms.B. Phylogenetic analysis and E. coli CBS proteins. Below is a figure from a research paper showing alignment of the amino acid sequences of human, rat, yeast, 1. What do the dashes in the sequence represent? The dashes represent absence of amino acids in a particular protein sequence that would correspond to the amino acids in the sequence of another protein in the region of alignment. 2. Are the DNA sequences encoding amino acids that are conserved across species above necessarily the same? Why or why not? No, the sequences are not necessarily the same. The genetic code is degenerate, i.e. most of the time several codons are available that encode the same amino acid. Thus, DNA sequence may change (due to a point mutation) without affecting the resulting protein sequence. 3. What properties of the particular amino acids allow them to be grouped into the conservative groupings as described in the figure legend above? The amino acids grouped into conservative groupings have similar biochemical properties. L, V, M, and I are all hydrophobic and roughly similar in size. F, W, and Y are all hydrophobic residues with large rings. A and G are the two smallest amino acids. S and T are similarly sized polar amino acids. R and K are positively charged amino acids with linear chains. D and E are negatively charged amino acids. The difference within the (D, N) and (E, Q) pairs is the acid vs. amino firm of each amino acid. 4. Look at the genetic code table. Is there a relationship between the codons encoding amino acids in conservative groupings? Most of these groupings allow a one point mutation conversion between any member of a grouping and any other member of the same grouping. The two exceptions are the CGN encodings for arginine (R) that require two or three point mutations to be converted to an encoding for lysine (K), and the tryptophan (W) encoding that requires two point mutations to be converted to an encoding for either of the other members of its grouping. Figure removed due to copyright reasons.5. Is CBS a good candidate for creating a phylogenetic tree on the basis of its sequence? Why or why not? CBS is essential for cysteine biosynthesis, and, therefore, is likely to be relatively more conserved in evolution. As such, it is a fairly good candidate for phylogenetic tree construction. Even better candidates are genes that encode products essential for survival, such as rRNA subunits. 6. Are human disease alleles of CBS likely to help with phylogenetic tree construction? Why or why not? These alleles are not likely to help because they represent versions of the gene that results in a protein with weakened or abolished functions. Such alleles are not likely to have been propagated through evolutionary lineage. They are likely the result of much more resent mutations that occurred after humans differentiated into a distinct species. 7. If constructing a phylogenetic tree on the basis of CBS alignment, would it be more useful to work with the protein or cDNA sequences? cDNA sequences or DNA sequences? Why? It would be more useful to work with cDNA sequences than with protein sequences because with the cDNA sequences we can observe the silent as well as the missense mutations that occurred in each organism’s lineage. Similarly, it is more useful to work with DNA than cDNA sequence because with DNA sequence we can observe mutations that occurred in the intron, as well as in the coding, regions of the gene. 8. Do you expect the human wild type gene to complement yeast CYS4 deficiency? Why or why not? There is a good chance that the product of the wild type human gene would complement yeast CYS4 deficiency.


View Full Document

MIT 7 014 - From Yeast to Humans—Essential Genes on the Evolutionary Continium

Documents in this Course
Ecology

Ecology

21 pages

Quiz 2

Quiz 2

9 pages

Quiz II

Quiz II

13 pages

Quiz II

Quiz II

9 pages

Quiz 1

Quiz 1

9 pages

Quiz 3

Quiz 3

2 pages

Quiz 1

Quiz 1

16 pages

Quiz II

Quiz II

13 pages

Quiz III

Quiz III

10 pages

Quiz III

Quiz III

14 pages

Quiz 2

Quiz 2

14 pages

Quiz 2

Quiz 2

14 pages

S

S

4 pages

Load more
Download From Yeast to Humans—Essential Genes on the Evolutionary Continium
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view From Yeast to Humans—Essential Genes on the Evolutionary Continium and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view From Yeast to Humans—Essential Genes on the Evolutionary Continium 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?