DOC PREVIEW
MIT STS 005 - Study guide

This preview shows page 1 out of 3 pages.

Save
View full document
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 3 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 3 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

Study Guide #2, 9/20-9/22: Health and the Environment Wood, William. New England’s Prospect (1634). Edited by Alden T. Vaughan. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 1977. pp. 25-31. Flint, Timothy. The History and Geography of the Mississippi Valley. To Which is Appended A Condensed Physical Geography of the Atlantic United States, and The Whole American Continent, 3rd Edition. Volume I. Cincinnati: E. Flint, and Boston, Carter, Hendee, and Co., 1833. pp. 35-40, 199-201, 223-224, 298-299, 331, 407-408. Kupperman, Karen Ordahl. “Fear of Hot Climates in the Anglo-American Colonial Experience.” William and Mary Quarterly 41 (1984): 213-240. Valencius, Conevery Bolton. “The Geography of Health and the Making of the American West: Arkansas and Missouri, 1800-1860.” In Medical Geography in Historical Perspective, ed. Nicolaas A. Rupke. London: Wellcome Institute Trust for the History of Medicine, 2001. pp. 121-145. Just like last week, this week’s readings included a mix of primary and secondary sources. This week the distinction is more straight-forward. There are two primary sources (Wood and Flint) that show you how people in the 1630s and the 1830s thought about health, disease, and the environment. Then there are two secondary sources written by historians (Kupperman and Valencius), that analyze primary sources to try and reconstruct what disease theories were, and what impact they had on the lives of colonists and settlers. Your goals as readers depend on the type of reading. For primary sources, try and put yourselves in the shoes of the authors to appreciate and understand their view of the world. For secondary sources, figure out what the author is arguing (i.e. what point they are trying to make), what kinds of sources they are using (i.e. is there data appropriate), and whether you think they are convincing. New England’s Prospect: Even though he wrote one of the best descriptions of early Massachusetts, little is known about William Wood (e.g. when he was born, his family background, etc.). He seems to have sailed to Salem in 1629, spent four years in Massachusetts, then returned to England in 1633, where he wrote and published this book. The excerpt you will read is the opening chapter. He starts with a description of the geography and climate of Massachusetts Bay (including Cambridge) -- does this match your own experience here? Wood thinks that New England is a healthy match for English bodies. How does he think environment and bodies interact? He admits that mortality was high among early settlers (p. 28), and that winters and frostbite have been problematic. How does he explain away these problems to maintain his faith inthe healthfulness of the climate? How does he compare the healthfulness of New England and Virginia (pp. 31-32)? While his claims about the absence of smallpox, measles, and consumption (tuberculosis) are not consistent with the reports of other colonists, there are others who, like Wood, describe sickly people in England becoming healthy in New England. To understand Wood’s claims, it is important to recognize why this book was written (p. 25). Does this make you question his reliability? “Spin” was not the creation of modern media consultants… History and Geography of the Mississippi Valley: Timothy Flint was born in Reading, Massachusetts, in 1780. He graduated from Harvard College in 1800, became a Congregational minister, and preached in Lunenberg from 1802 to 1814. After a falling out with his congregation (a result of his experiments on chemistry and metallurgy), he went west and spent eight years as a missionary in the Ohio and Mississippi river valleys. His extensive travels eventually broke his health. In 1825 he returned to Massachusetts to devote himself to literature and writing. Moving between Massachusetts, Cincinnati, New York, and Louisiana, he wrote a series of articles and books about the history and geography of the Mississippi valley, the Indian wars, Daniel Boone, natural history and geology, and a series of works of fiction. He died in Salem in 1840. The selection on the syllabus is a collection of brief excerpts from his very long book about the Mississippi valley. This book was written, in part, as a guide to people interested in settling this area. To get oriented to the whole book, scan the table of contents (pp. 5-9). The first excerpt begins on the bottom of p. 35 and goes to the top of p. 40. Why does his section on disease immediately move into a discussion of landscapes? What makes land healthy or sick? How does settlement (clearing land, planting crops) affect the health of the land? After this introductory section, we have include five selections about the health of different states (Florida, Alabama, Missouri, Illinois, Ohio). As you read these, focus on the discussions of climate, disease, populations, and not the other material on some of the pages (crops, seminaries, etc. -- but if you are interested, on p. 408 he describes the ruins of the mound civilization I mentioned in lecture on 9/13). As with the Wood selection, do his descriptions of the climates and healthfulness of these states ring true with what you know about these states? Many of the disease names might be unfamiliar (pleurisy, cachexy, bilious fevers). Identifying the diseases and symptoms is less important and understanding his ideas about the causes of disease. Flint makes an interesting claim on the bottom of p. 35: “Where the lands are extremely fertile, it seems to be appended to them, as a drawback to that advantage, that they are generally sickly.” Is this based on science, religion, or common sense? What were the sources of medical knowledge in this time period? “Fear of Hot Climates”: Karen Kupperman is a leading American historian, now at NYU. She has published many books and articles about colonial Americanhistory, covering English colonies in the Caribbean, Carolinas, and Virginia, and the interactions between colonists and American Indians. This article explores the disease theories of early colonists, focusing on English colonists moving to the Caribbean or southern North America (e.g. Carolinas, Virginia) in the 1600s and 1700s. How were colonists mislead by latitude (e.g. England is at the same latitude as Newfoundland)? Why were they so frightened of heat? How was the sun both a source of wealth (p. 218) and danger? How did


View Full Document

MIT STS 005 - Study guide

Download Study guide
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view Study guide and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view Study guide 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?