Groups& group decision makingLets try a group decisionRead the following and write downyour answerYou have 30 sec!Buying a necklaceA woman buys a $78 necklace at a jewelry store. She gives the jeweler a check for $100. Because he doses not have the $22 change on hand, he goes to next merchant and exchanges the check for $100 in cash. He gives the woman her change and her necklace. She leaves and never returns. The check bounces (for which the bank charges $15), and he must make it good to the other merchant. He originally paid $39 for the necklace. What is his net loss?30 sec later ...If you think the answer is ABOVE 100 go to the front RIGHT corner of the room If you think the answer is BELOW 100 go to the front LEFT corner of the room Talk to each otherNextIf you finished go to your seat or go talk to the people in the other group on the way to your seatAnswers(39 + 22 + 15 + 100 - 78) = 98How many people started with theright answer?How many people ended with theright answer?What was the process?GroupsWhat are the advantages of groups? Are groups always going to be good mechanisms? What could be some of the disadvantages?Negatives of groupsMob behavior & deindividuation Pluralistic ignorance Conformity Compliance ObedienceMob behavior&DeindividuationMob behaviorWe see it after sports games Riots Others?Zimbardo, (1969): 1. Anonymity 2. Diffusion of responsibility 3. Attention directed away from self Internal States: (Deindividuation) 1. No Evaluation Apprehension 2. Weakened social controls Behavioral Consequences: Increased conformity to group norms Impulsive, irrational, destructive, or antisocial behavior Antecedent conditions:Gergen et al., (1973): Deviance in the dark• Students (age 17-22) in mixed sex groups of 6 in a dark room• Anonymous entry and exit, asked not to identify themselves• What happened?: —First, explored space and “chatted.”—Soon discussion turned to “extremely important” matters.—After 40 minutes, started to engage in physical “interaction.”—90% indicated touching each other on purpose.—Only 20% attempted to keep others from touching them.—50% hugged.—80% reported being sexually aroused.Experimental: Zimbardo (1969)Task: Deliver electric shocks to a girl in a learning study. Anonymity manipulated: —Half were individuated. —Half were anonymous.Zimbardo’s prison studyZimbardo got Stanford students to act as prisoners and guard for a few days he did not expect the extent to which they will take their position seriously, identify with it and act against the other group There was abuse of the prisoners...http://www.prisonexperiment.orghttp://www.zimbardo.comhttp://www.stanleymilgram.com/milgram.htmlCourtesy of Philip G. Zimbardo. Used with permission.Mob & deindividuation�There are conditions where groups can cause very undesirable behaviors No leader, no personal responsibility, no sensitivity to previous social norms and following the emerging norms of
View Full Document
Unlocking...