UMass Amherst LEGAL 397N - Blocking Care for Women (2 pages)

Previewing page 1 of 2 page document View the full content.
View Full Document

Blocking Care for Women



Previewing page 1 of actual document.

View the full content.
View Full Document
View Full Document

Blocking Care for Women

72 views

Lecture Notes


Pages:
2
School:
University of Massachusetts Amherst
Course:
Legal 397n - ST-Law & Public Policy

Unformatted text preview:

OP ED CONTRIBUTOR Blocking Care for Women O By HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON and CECILE RICHARDS Published September 18 2008 LAST month the Bush administration launched the latest salvo in its eight year campaign to undermine women s rights and women s health by placing ideology ahead of science a proposed rule from the Department of Health and Human Services that would govern family planning It would require that any health care entity that receives federal financing whether it s a physician in private practice a hospital or a state government certify in writing that none of its employees are required to assist in any way with medical services they find objectionable Laws that have been on the books for some 30 years already allow doctors to refuse to perform abortions The new rule would go further ensuring that all employees and volunteers for health care entities can refuse to aid in providing any treatment they object to which could include not only abortion and sterilization but also contraception Health and Human Services estimates that the rule which would affect nearly 600 000 hospitals clinics and other health care providers would cost 44 5 million a year to administer Astonishingly the department does not even address the real cost to patients who might be refused access to these critical services Women patients who look to their health care providers as an unbiased source of medical information might not even know they were being deprived of advice about their options or denied access to care The definition of abortion in the proposed rule is left open to interpretation An earlier draft included a medically inaccurate definition that included commonly prescribed forms of contraception like birth control pills IUD s and emergency contraception That language has been removed but because the current version includes no definition at all individual health care providers could decide on their own that birth control is the same as abortion The rule would also allow



View Full Document

Access the best Study Guides, Lecture Notes and Practice Exams

Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view Blocking Care for Women and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view Blocking Care for Women and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?