DOC PREVIEW
Inland Ports

This preview shows page 1-2-3-4 out of 13 pages.

Save
View full document
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 13 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 13 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 13 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 13 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 13 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

Inland PortsBackgroundLiteratureAlliance, Fort WorthWorkshopInland PortsInland PortsRobert HarrisonRobert HarrisonCenter for Transportation ResearchCenter for Transportation ResearchThe University of Texas at AustinThe University of Texas at AustinBackgroundBackgroundInland Ports appear early 1990sInland Ports appear early 1990sRiver and land border gatewaysRiver and land border gatewaysState DOT planning not capturing State DOT planning not capturing transportation impactstransportation impactsLiteratureLiteratureWide variety of sites, terms and modesWide variety of sites, terms and modesNo theory No theory ––““contextualcontextual””Most information from promotersMost information from promotersDifficulty in establishing Inland Ports Difficulty in establishing Inland PortsAlliance, Fort WorthAlliance, Fort WorthAlliance Alliance ––a promoters dreama promoters dreamAir (dedicated freight), Interstate (truck) and Air (dedicated freight), Interstate (truck) and Intermodal (BNSF)Intermodal (BNSF)Staged successStaged successUnfortunately uniqueUnfortunately uniqueCorporate Growth99,000 SF AvailableCorporate Growth99,000 SF AvailableEconomic Impact to North Texas$0$500,000,000$1,000,000,000$1,500,000,000$2,000,000,000$2,500,000,000$3,000,000,000$3,500,000,0001990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 20042004 Alliance Economic Impact = $2.97 BillionEconomic ImpactEconomic Impact$2.97 billion$2.97 billionCapital InvestmentCapital InvestmentPrivatePrivate$5.5 billion$5.5 billionPublicPublic$0.3 billion$0.3 billionProperty TaxesProperty Taxes19901990--20042004$384 million$384 millionSquare footage developed Square footage developed 19901990--20042004$24 million$24 millionJobsJobs19901990--September 2005September 200524,00024,000Current DS RouteSecondary DS RouteCurrent Single Stack Route•Next Day Service to Columbus•Reduce Transit to Chicago by 1 Day•Will Shave Approx. 225 Route Miles Off Each Container Move to Chicago•Greater Efficiencies•High Speed Double StackHeartland Corridor RoutePort-Heartland High Speed Doublestack CorridorWorkshopWorkshopInland Ports are difficult to implementInland Ports are difficult to implementIf successful (even if stages) they create a If successful (even if stages) they create a number of economic benefitsnumber of economic benefitsLand use impacts potentially beneficialLand use impacts potentially beneficialTypology: transfer; market portal; transportation Typology: transfer; market portal; transportation hub/linkhub/linkExplore links to geographic methodsExplore links to geographic


Inland Ports

Download Inland Ports
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view Inland Ports and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view Inland Ports 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?