Unformatted text preview:

Types of groupsGeo 302D: Age of Dinosaurs LAB 4: Systematics Part 1 Systematics is the comparative study of biological diversity with the intent of determining the relationships between organisms. Humankind has always tried to find ways of organizing organisms into categories. Carolus Linnaeus was the first to utilize a working system of hierarchical classification in 1758. It is his classification scheme that most of you are familiar with because it is still taught in its basic form in grade schools. The system is based upon the organization of life forms into groups based upon their overall similarity. In this course we use phylogenetic systematics, which is also called cladistics. This technique is used by most professional biologists, zoologists, and paleontologists. In this system, organisms are grouped together on the basis of shared ancestry. A result of using this system is that the ranks (e.g. Kingdom, Phylum, Class, Order, etc.), which many of you learned in previous science classes, are impractical and do not necessarily reflect evolutionary relationships among organisms. Therefore, they are not used in cladistic methodology. Cladograms Cladistics uses branching diagrams called cladograms (or trees) to visually display the hypothesized relationships between taxa (a taxon is any unit of biological diversity; taxa is the plural form of the word). Look at the cladogram below. A, B, C, and D represent different taxa. They are at the terminal tips of branches on the tree, so they are called terminal taxa. The points on the tree where branches meet are called nodes. A node represents the point of divergence between evolutionary lineages, which are represented by the branches. The node also represents the most recent common ancestor between the two lineages splitting at that point. Terminal Taxon → ↑ Node How do you read a cladogram? Take a look at the cladogram above again. Taxon A branches off first. This tells you that A split from the lineage leading to the group (also called a clade) composed of B + C + D + their most recent common ancestor, before the lineages leading to B, C, and D each began to diverge. The node from which A splits off is where you should see the last organism that gave rise to both A and the group [B+C+D+ their most recent common ancestor]. Any two groups which share a more recent common ancestor with each other than with any other group are called sister 1taxa. Group [B+C+D+ their most recent common ancestor] and A are each other’s sister taxon. Likewise, you can see that B branched off from the lineage leading to C and D after their split with A, but before C and D diverged. This means that B shares a most recent common ancestor with group [C+D+ their most recent common ancestor]. B and [C+D+ their most recent common ancestor] are therefore sister taxa, and are more closely related to each other than either is to A. You can probably already see that using terminology like [B+C+D+ their most recent common ancestor] gets lengthy and confusing. To get around this we give names to the groups at the nodes. See the cladogram below. A, B, C, and D are still terminal taxa, but now we also give the larger clades to which they belong the names X, Y, and Z. Now we can say that A and Y are sister taxa, and it still means the same as saying, “A and the group [B+C+D+ their most recent common ancestor] are sister taxa”. IMPORTANT! X, Y, and Z are the names of clades, NOT the names of the organisms at each node! The groups X, Y, and Z are circled, showing how each clade is nested within others. Types of groups There are certain kinds of groups created by classification. In the figure below you see a dolphin, a shark, and an extinct form of marine reptile called an ichthyosaur. They all have streamlined bodies for moving easily through water, their forelimbs are modified into flattened paddles for steering, and their tails are flattened to make a powerful means of propulsion. It is conceivable that you might look at these three animals and group them together on the basis of their overall similarity. However, the dolphin is a mammal, the shark is a fish, and the icthyosaur is a reptile. Any group created that contains only these three animals would be considered polyphyletic. A polyphyletic group is any group made up of organisms which do not share a recent common ancestor. !! Polyphyletic groups are not natural groups because they do not reflect shared ancestry. 2The traditional, Linnean, classification system recognized paraphyletic groups. A paraphyletic group is made up of an ancestral organism and some, but not all, of its descendants. For example, the cladogram below consists of lizards, crocodiles, and birds as terminal taxa. The birds and crocodiles are actually more closely related to each other (share a more recent common ancestor) than either is to lizards. In Linnean classification, lizards and crocodiles are lumped together in the Class Reptilia. Birds were placed in their own class, Class Aves. This means that “Reptilia” in a Linnean sense is paraphyletic. It contains an ancestral organism, plus lizards and crocodiles, but excludes some of the ancestor’s descendants, the birds. Evolutionarily speaking, birds are reptiles. They are very specialized in form and function, but they are still descended from reptiles. Cladistics does not recognize paraphyletic groupings as natural groups. Cladistics only recognizes monophyletic groups. A monophyletic group (or taxon) is composed of an ancestor and all of its descendants. The cladogram with lizards, crocs, and birds is shown below. “Birds” is merely one monophyletic group nested within a larger monophyletic group called Reptilia. Determining relationships Systematists are faced with the daunting task of trying to establish the inter-relationships of all organisms on Earth, both living and extinct. To achieve this goal, they look at organisms in detail and use the morphological characters they possess to determine relationships. There are several terms and types of characters for which you are responsible. - apomorphy: a derived character - plesiomorphy: a primitive character. - autapomorphy: a derived (new) character that is present in only one taxon. - symplesiomorphy: a shared, primitive character. These characters are not informative when


View Full Document

UT GEO 302D - Lab4 Systematics Part 1

Download Lab4 Systematics Part 1
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view Lab4 Systematics Part 1 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view Lab4 Systematics Part 1 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?