DOC PREVIEW
UW-Madison SOC 674 - Demographic Balancing Equation

This preview shows page 1-2-3-4-5-6 out of 17 pages.

Save
View full document
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 17 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 17 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 17 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 17 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 17 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 17 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 17 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

Demographic Balancing Equation P1=P0+B-D+IM-OM+e P1=P0+NI+NM+e e=error of closure Example from Japan 2003 P2002=127,435,000, P2003=127,619,000 B2002=1,139,000, D2002=1,023,000, NM2002=68,000 What is error of closure? U.S. exampleCrude rates CBR= (B ÷ P) x 1,000 CDR= (D ÷ P) x 1,000 RNI = [(B – D) ÷ P] x 100 = (CBR – CDR) ÷ 10 CROM = (OM ÷ P) x 1,000, CRIM = (IM ÷ P) x 1,000 CMR = (M ÷ P) x 1,000 = (CRIM-CROM) ÷ 10Rates refer to calendar year – “period” ratesRange of measures 1) CBR: 56 (Niger) to 7 (Hong Kong) 2) CDR: 28 (Botswana, Lesotho) to 1 (UAE), 2 (Kuwait) 3) Why so low in UAE, Kuwait? 4) IMR: 172 (Afghanistan) to 2.4 (Iceland) 5) RNI: 3.4 (Niger) –0.7 (Ukraine)Rates and concept of risk 1) Rates vs. Ratios – what is the difference? 2) Rates vs. Probabilities – what is the difference? 3) How to define “at risk” population? (notion of "person-years")4) Use of mid-year population a. Mean of beginning and end population – assume entries and exits distributed evenly across period 5) Limitations of “crude” rates a. Esp. CBR, CIMRExample of more refined rate 1) Infant mortality rate IMR = (deaths to children under one year of age in year t ÷ live births in year t) x 1,000 2) Advantages 3) What is the problem? 4) Is this really a problem?Growth rates 1) Arithmetic growth a. P1=P0+x b. P2=P1+x c. P2=P0+2x d. Pn=P0+xn e. 000nPxPnP-Pr =÷⎟⎠⎞⎜⎝⎛= f. Growth is constant2) Geometric growth a. P1=P0[1+(CBR0-CDR0)] b. P2=P1[1+(CBR1-CDR1)] c. P2=P0[1+(CBR0-CDR0)][1+(CBR1-CDR1)] d. ∏−−−+=n01n1n0n)CDRCBR(1PP e. Pn=P0(1+r)n f. log(Pn÷P0) ÷ n=log(1+r); 1PPrn0n−= g. Growth is assumed constant over period 0-n h. Compounding takes place at specified intervals3) Exponential growth a. P1=P0er b. P2=P1er c. rn0n0r0nePePP ==∏ d. Growth is constant, but compounding is continuous3) Doubling time a. 2=ern b. ln(2)= .693 = rn c. n ≈ .7 ÷ r 4) ExamplesHuman Population Growth Since 1 A.D.  2000 Bruce Thompson, EcoTracs, 937 E. Browning Ave. Salt Lake City, UT 84105 (801) 467-3240012345671 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000YEAR180019301960197519871999POPULATION (in billions)Sociology 674, 9/14/06, page 9 Some examples 1) Annual growth rate between two censuses a. Pakistan – P1972=65,309,340 P1981=84,253,644 2) Doubling time a. Taiwan – P2000= 22,520,776 P2003= 22,604,550 3) Why not use arithmetic growth? a. Not realistic for longer periods b. Not realistic in high growth contextsSociology 674, 9/14/06, page 10 Population Momentum 1) Why does population continue to grow even after fertility declines to replacement level? 2) When does annual # added to population begin to decline? a. When is Pn+1-Pn < Pn-Pn-1? b. When Pnr* < Pn-1r or rrPP*1-nn<Population Size and Fertility Rates in Italy, 1992-200356,200,00056,400,00056,600,00056,800,00057,000,00057,200,00057,400,00057,600,00057,800,00058,000,00058,200,0001992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003Population11.11.21.31.41.51.61.71.81.92TFRPopulation TFRNatural Increase and TFR in Japan, 1950-2002-2004006008001,0001,2001,4001,600195019521954195619581960196219641966196819701972197419761978198019821984198619881990199219941996199820002002Natural Increase (1,000)0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 TFRNat. Inc.


View Full Document

UW-Madison SOC 674 - Demographic Balancing Equation

Download Demographic Balancing Equation
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view Demographic Balancing Equation and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view Demographic Balancing Equation 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?