Unformatted text preview:

PLS 304 – Introduction to Public Policy Analysis Mark T. Imperial, Ph.D. Topics: Evaluative Criteria  Some Basic Terms and Concepts − Criteria are what we use to guide decision making and compare alternatives − Goals: formally and broadly worded statements about what we desire − Objectives: more focused and concretely worded statements about end states, usually with a time dimension and a client population specified − Criteria: specific statements about dimensions of the objectives that will be used to evaluate alternative policies and programs − Measures: tangible, if not quantifiable operational definitions of the evaluative criteria. Each criterion should have multiple measures associated with it. − Establishing Evaluative Criteria − Define and establish acceptable and useful criteria. The role of the analyst includes helping the decisionmaker clarify what is sought and define objectives so that alternatives can be designed − In practice, decisionmakers may not want to establish clear criteria so they establish purposely-vague criteria. − Analysts may also be frustrated when politicians are unwilling to discard multiple, conflicting objectives − Defining criteria is a learn by doing exercise. By interacting with clients, and working through the analysis, new criteria are discovered as old criteria are examined  Common Evaluative Criteria − Strong arguments can be made for always including efficiency as a substantive value in policy analysis. − However, there are values other than Pareto efficiency − Effectiveness − Effectiveness refers to the likelihood that a policy or program will achieve stated goals and objectives or demonstrated that it achieved them − Problem is that many policies and programs have multiple, competing goals and objectives and some may be achieved at the expense of others − Costs & benefits as a measure of efficiency − Evaluating costs and benefits is central to policy analysis − Benefit-cost analysis is the systematic analysis of the value of the benefits and costs of an alternative. It is a way to compare the efficiency of alternative courses of action that may have different goals and objectives. The ratio of benefits to costs is a measure of efficiency. In general, you would not proceed unless the ratio of benefits to costs is greater than 1. − Cost-effectiveness analysis is tool for finding the alternative that accomplishes the specified goal at the lowest cost. - 1 -PLS 304 – Lecture Notes Evaluative Criteria − Opportunity cost: the resources diverted from other uses to make a given policy or program possible. In other words, the difference between the value of goods and services in a proposed project and their value if they were used in some alternative way. They include monetarizable and nonmonetarizable and tangible and intangible costs − Intangible costs or benefits: those that cannot be measured in recognized units (pain and suffering, loss of confidence) − Tangible costs and benefits: those that can be measured in some type of recognizable unit – they can be counted − Monetarizable costs and benefits: they can be counted in monetary – dollar – terms since their value can be judged in the marketplace − Direct costs: resources that must be committed to implement a policy or program. This includes borrowing costs, one time fixed costs, borrowing costs, and operating and maintenance costs − Indirect costs: the costs associated with impacts or consequences of a policy or program. − For example, building a new parking garage has costs in materials and operation and maintenance (direct cost). After its construction it might also increase traffic in surrounding neighborhoods (indirect cost) − In practice, it is not always easy to distinguish between direct and indirect costs. A key is what was the legislative intent of the policy or program − Sunk costs: they are costs associated with resources already built or paid for (If you propose expanding a bridge, you don’t include the cost of the bridge already built) − Shadow prices: a method of establishing costs/benefits when market prices are unavailable or distorted. You can establish the price by looking at another context that is viewed as competitive. − Discount rates: a rate estimated to calculate the time preference for money so that analysts can determine future values in today’s dollars. Key feature is that a dollar today is worth more than getting a dollar tomorrow − Standing refers to who is to be considered when costs and benefits are computed. In other words, who has a right to be included in the set of individuals or groups whose changes in utility or welfare are counted. − Determining boundaries of a cost-benefit analysis often influences the results − It is really a contextual decision and when there is doubt, you should do the analysis in a variety of ways with different definitions on standing − Marginal analysis − Fixed costs: do not vary with the scale of the public action, at least in the short run (capital costs like purchasing a new garbage truck) − Variable costs: vary with the level of output (to collect more solid waste requires more labor and possibly new trucks and other equipment) − Average costs: simply the total costs divided by the total output ($350 per ton of garbage collected) − Marginal cost: is the cost incurred to produce an additional unit of output (cost of collecting 1,100 tons of garbage compared to 1,099 - 2 -PLS 304 – Lecture Notes Evaluative Criteria − Marginal costs usually decline with additional output, but not always (e.g., at some point you will need to buy a new truck) − Rule of marginality states that output should be produced to the point where marginal cost equals marginal revenue − Law of diminishing or increasing returns: Eventually you will reach a point where each new unit of cost contributes less benefit than the preceding unit (diminishing) or each new unit of cost contributes more benefit than the preceding unit (increasing). − These occur in the short run where levels of some inputs are fixed − Economies and diseconomies of scale: Larger size causes decreased marginal costs (economies of scale) and larger size causes increasing marginal costs − Occur in the long run where levels of all variables can be increased or decreased − Pitfalls when dealing with


View Full Document

UNCW PLS 304 - Public Policy Analysis

Download Public Policy Analysis
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view Public Policy Analysis and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view Public Policy Analysis 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?