DOC PREVIEW
MIT HST 071 - NON-HORMONAL CONTRACEPTION

This preview shows page 1-2 out of 6 pages.

Save
View full document
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 6 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 6 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 6 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

IN SUMMARY NON-HORMONAL CONTRACEPTION NON-HORMONAL CONTRACEPTION HISTORY o Ebers Papyrus (1550 BC) o Pliny the Elder (23-79 AD) o Dioscorides (58-64 AD) o Soranus (100 AD) o Al-Razi (923 AD) o Ali ibn Abbas (994 AD) o Avicenna (1037 AD) Lactational Control of Fertility o Darwin (1809-1882) o Koran (2:223) o “Mothers shall give suck to their offspring for two whole years if they desire to complete the term” o Stillborn  pregnancy interval reduced o Higher fertility rates among users of “wet nurse” o Patterns changed around 1750’ when breast feeding started to decline Reasonable at Time o Wiping out the vagina o ? Reasonable but ineffective o Honey, alum, lactic acid, pepper as pessaro Totally unreasonable and ineffective o Holding breath at time of ejaculation o Jumping backwards 7 times after coitus Contraception o (Population control ???) o Infanticide ies and barriers o Opiates, gin, too little food, smothering (common in 18th century) o Abandonment o Foundling Hospital (Coram 1741) o 10,204/14934 infants admitted then died o Majority were illegitimate children o 50% of all legitimate births admitted were of mothers wiIUD History o 1909 Richter used silkworm gut o 1909 Graefenberg used silkworm gut and silver wire o 1960 Lippes Loop, Margulies Spiral, Saf-T-Coil o 1960’s Zipper used copper devices o Tail-less steel ring used in China by 45 million o About 10% of contraceptors in USA o Progesterone impregnated o Copper coated (various shapes) o 10 year use th 6 or more children Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology HST.071: Human Reproductive Biology Course Director: Professor Henry KlapholzIN SUMMARY NON-HORMONAL CONTRACEPTION CONDOMS Condom History o Used for centuries o Pregnancy protection o Infection protection o Stimulation o Decoration o 1350 BC Egyptians wore decorative covers for penis o 1564 Fallopius described linen sheaths o 1700’s animal intestines: o Given name “Condom”: Protection from venereal disease and numerous bastard offspring o 1798 Casanova (from his memoirs) Barrier Methods Dr. Condom -English physician Charles II had many children 1800 in brothels all over Europe English Cape French letters 1844 Vulcanization of rubber 1850 rubber condoms in USA 1880 Diaphragm in Germany Sponge Real sponges used for centuries June 1983 “TODAY” (Two Day) 2 inches long by 1.25 inches thick Polyurethane -1 gram nonoxynol-9 125-150 ug per 24 hours (10-15%) Rare toxic shock Bacteriocidal/virocidal/spermicidal Not carcinogenic Remove 6 hours after the last coitus FUNDAMENTAL QUESTIONS 1. What are condoms made of? 2. Which sexually transmitted disease do the various types of condoms protect against and why? 3. What is a contraceptive sponge made of? How effective is it? 4. How does the IUD work? 5. What are the different types of IUD available? 6. What are life spans of the various types of IUD’s in current use? 7. What non-contraceptive benefits does the MIRENA have? 8. What is the causative organism of “toxic shock syndrome”? What are the clinical manifestations of this syndrome? 9. Discuss the history of the IUD.IN SUMMARY NON-HORMONAL CONTRACEPTION CERVICAL CAP • Thousands of years old • Molded opium into cup-like devices • Placed over the cervix • Beeswax and oiled paper -shaped into "thimbles” • Casanova, -lime or lemon and cut it in half. • Acid of the juice -spermicidal agent • Skin of the fruit -cap to cover the cervix • Modern cap (The Prentif Cavity-Rim Cervical Cap) most exotic of all caps were made of gold! ADVANTAGES • One small application of spermicide • Less messy than the diaphragm • more aesthetic for the user. • Smaller than a diaphragm • Less noticeable to either partner. • May use with poor vaginal muscle tone. -latex rubber • Assist in avoiding urinary tract infections associated with diaphragm use. • Sturdier than a diaphragm. • Less spermicide is used -more pleasant oral sex. • Fewer and less serious side effects than the pill or IUD. • Protection against some sexually transmitted diseases. • No reports of cases of toxic shock • Can be left in place for up to 48 hours MAY NOT BE USED WITH • An unusually long or short cervix precludes use • A history of cervical lacerations or scarring. • Current cervicitis. • An unusually shaped or asymmetrical cervix. • Current vaginal infections. • Unresolved Abnormal Pap smears PROBLEMS • Sometimes more difficult to insert or remove than a diaphragm. • Can be dislodged from the cervix during sex. • Development of abnormal PAP smear VAGINAL SPONGES • Polyurethane material • Impregnated with nonoxynol-9 • TODAY -effectiveness due to release of spermic• Left in place 6 hours • Wear up to 48 hours • 6 hours without replacement ide not as a barrier • Collagen Sponge (traps sperm, absorbs semen, is large, grows bacteria, TSS enhancement)IN SUMMARY NON-HORMONAL CONTRACEPTION FUNDAMENTAL QUESTIONS 1. What is a cervical cap ? 2. What is the contraceptive efficacy ? 3. What is the mechanism of action of the cap ? 4. What are cervical caps made of and why ? 5. What is a contraceptive sponge ? 6. What spermicide is used in the sponge ? 7. Are there any risks in using the sponge ?IN SUMMARY NON-HORMONAL CONTRACEPTION FEMALE CONDOMS ADVANTAGES • Effective immediately • Do not affect breastfeeding • Do not interfere with intercourse (may be inserted up to 8 hours before) • Can be used as backup to other methods • No method-related health risks • No systemic side effects • No prescription or medical assessment necessary • Controlled by the woman • May provide protection against STDs • May help prevent cervical cancer DISADVANTAGES • Expensive (at this time) • Moderately effective (5-21 pregnancies per 100 women during the first year1) • Effectiveness as contraceptives depends on willingness to follow instructions • User-dependent (require continued motivation and use with each act of intercourse) • Disposal of used condoms may be a problem • Adequate storage must be available at the client’s home • Supplies must be readily available before intercourse begins • Resupply must be available FOR THESE Women • Who prefer not to use hormonal methods or cannot use them (e.g., smokers over 35 years of age) • Who prefer not to use IUDs • Who are breastfeeding and need


View Full Document

MIT HST 071 - NON-HORMONAL CONTRACEPTION

Download NON-HORMONAL CONTRACEPTION
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view NON-HORMONAL CONTRACEPTION and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view NON-HORMONAL CONTRACEPTION 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?