DOC PREVIEW
UGA LEGL 2700 - Exam 1 Study Guide
Type Study Guide
Pages 8

This preview shows page 1-2-3 out of 8 pages.

Save
View full document
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 8 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 8 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 8 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 8 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

LEGL 2700 1nd EditionExam # 1 Study Guide Law Introduction (Lecture 1)What is law?-a set of rules made by the state and backed up with enforcement-there is legitimacy that the state has for creating laws-The legislature branch makes the laws and therefore has the legitimacy-"Broadly Custom"- practices that accumulate a certain amount of legitimacy develops when people get together and solve problems by finding patternsWhat is the Rule of Law?- law that is generally and equally enforced-Applies to everyone, even lawmakers-Is important to business transactions-Brings good trust for most jurisdiction-Protects innovation and workWhat is Common Law?-a United Kingdom based version of a legal system that emphasizes the role of judges in determining the meaning of laws and how they apply to society-Judges making decision in fact intensive disputes and builds up an arsenal of approaches and solutions to common property situations-Uses the precedents or prior judicial cases to create decisions on current issues -“Stare Decisis”- meaning “let the previous decision stand” is when judges look back at previous cases and apply the same standing on present casesWhat is Civil Law?-a Roman based version of a legal system that emphasizes on the laws themselves-relies more on legislation than judicial decisions to determine what the law is-civil law courts do not make law nor do their judges think themselves obligated to follow prior judicial decisionsThe Court System (Lecture 2) What is the role of Judges?-figure of the courts that deals with questions of law-Decides what law applies or what legal standard applies-Administers the case and admits evidence-Regulates the attorney's arguments and instructs the juriesWhat is the role of Juries?- people that determine the questions of fact in a case-Usually a group of 12 or more persons-Revolves around "did this person do something" or " did this person know something"-Determines whether the defendant is guilty or not of the crime-Decision has to be unanimousWhat is the role of Lawyers?- person that knows the skills of litigation and represents a person in court-Presents evidence to the judge and jury while arguing points of law-Writes motions and briefs about the law and how it should apply all in an effort to represent the best interest of their client-Has broad duty to administer justice that goes beyond just their clients interest including:oRole as a Counselor: giving legal adviceoRole as an Advocate: acting on behalf on the clientoRole as Public Servant: duty to the justice system-Attorney-Client privilege:oProtects certain communications between the client and the attorney so they can have honest discussionsoProtects clients from disclosureoExceptions: the information shows a harm to the Public District What is Judicial Review?-a power the judiciary system has to check both Congress and the President-Power to review laws passed by the legislative body and determine constitutionality-Power to review actions of executive branch and determine constitutionality-“Judicial Restraint”- should be used only in the most extreme situations should judicial review beused-“Judicial Activism”- provides that judicial review may be used when necessary to right a wrongWhat is Jurisdiction?-the legal boundaries a court has to hear a case -Subject Matter jurisdiction- power of the courts over the legal issues involved in a case-There are three ways to get Subject Matter Jurisdiction in Federal Court:Federal question casesDiversity of Citizenship- all the plaintiffs and all the defendants are from different states-If the U.S. is a party or controversies among states Litigation (Lecture 3) What is Litigation?-the process of taking legal action -Subject Matter jurisdiction- power of the courts over the legal issues involved in a case What is Standing to Sure?- right to sue according to standing-The claim must involve a legal controversy or allegation of a legal wrong-Plaintiff must have a stake, or real outcome in that controversy-Court must have Subject Matter Jurisdiction and Personal Jurisdiction(courts authority over the parties involved)What are the steps of Litigation?1. Pleadingsa. Starts when plaintiff files a complaint1. must showing standing over the issuesb. Defendant then files an answer to the complaint OR a counterclaim, if they don't answer they run the risk of a default judgment 2. Discoverya. Ensure awareness of facts and argumentsb. Both parties to be aware of the facts and arguments in the casec. There are no secrets in litigationd. Tries to make things fair, and prepare the triale. Narrows issuesf. Tools of Discovery:- Interrogatories- written Q and As- Requests for Production- asking for documents or information-must produce documents that could bring relevant facts to the trial- Depositions- in person questioning of a witness or related party under oath- Requests for Admission- narrow the scope of issues in play by requesting a party admit to a certain act 2. Pretriala. Motions-formal request that a party can make to a judge requesting that the judge take an action or make a judgment on a specific point-Popular Motions:Judgment on the Pleadings- requests that a judge makes a judgment on a case based on the initial pleadings(complaint and answer)Summary Judgment- motion that happens later when a party requests that the judge answer on the initial pleadings and the evidence or lack of evidenceFrivolous- a motion when there is a bad lawsuit, little to no chance of winning, or a claim that is absurdCompel Discovery- motion where the opponent would no cooperate 4. Trial Stagea. Jury selectioni. 12 people chosen from pool ii. Parties are able to examine juror and can excuse prospective juror with "biasness"iii. Peremptory Challenges: where lawyers can excuse a possible juror for no reason b. Motion for Directed Verdict- another opportunity for a party that does not have the burden of proof to ask the judge if they can throw out this particular claim or case because it’s clear that the party will not be able to produce enough evidence to back up said claim2. Decision Stage:-The decision has to clear and convincing -Judgment Notwithstanding Verdict:oJudge might be able to take a jury’s finding and say it shouldn't standoBasically "overrules" the jury or reverses the verdictoAppropriate only if the judge finds that no


View Full Document

UGA LEGL 2700 - Exam 1 Study Guide

Type: Study Guide
Pages: 8
Documents in this Course
Load more
Download Exam 1 Study Guide
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view Exam 1 Study Guide and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view Exam 1 Study Guide 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?