DOC PREVIEW
MIT 2 004 - Problem Set #2

This preview shows page 1 out of 4 pages.

Save
View full document
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 4 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 4 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

MIT OpenCourseWare http://ocw.mit.edu 2.004 Dynamics and Control II Spring 2008 For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use, visit: http://ocw.mit.edu/terms.Massachusetts Institute of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering 2.004 Dynamics and Control II Spring Term 2008 Problem Set 2 Assigned: Feb. 15, 2008 Due: Feb. 22, 2008 Reading: • Nise, Secs. 2.1 - 2.4. • Nise, Secs. 5.1 - 5.2. Problem 1: Getting ready for Lab. 2 - The DC Motor. Many servo control systems us a permanent magnet DC motor as the actuator. In our laboratory set-up we have a precision Maxon motor to drive the rotational plant. We will characterize this motor in Lab. 2. A DC motor is an energy transducer, that is it transforms energy in one domain to another. The motor converts, electrical power into mechanical rotational power, as depicted schematically below. As you will discover in Lab. 2, the same device ”driven backward” can also transform mechanical power into electrical power, that is it can act as an electrical generator by rotating the shaft. 9 9 (a) Assuming that in an ideal dc motor: (1) The electrical current im and the torque produced Tm have a linear relationship, that is Tm = Kmim and the voltage vb, known as the back emf, and the shaft angular velocity Ω are also linearly related vb = KvΩm where Km and Ke are the “motor torque constant” and “back emf constant” respectively. (2) and that the energy transduction is lossless, i.e. Powerin =Powerout , show how Km and Ke must be related. You will be measuring these quantities in Lab 2. 1 i , vT , Pm e c hPe l e c tPm e c hPe l e c tM o t o rG e n e r a t o rT , i , vp (b) The motor used in the lab is the Maxon model 148867. The data sheet is attached; the data for the 148867 is contained in the second column. Lines 14 and 15 specify the torque constant and back-emf constants. By converting to a consistent set of units, show that the energy transduction is lossless for this motor. Note: In practice a motor is not lossless because it has copper electrical coils inside, with finite electrical resistance. If this resistance is R there will be a dissipation P = i2R in the form of heat, and the terminal voltage will not be ve because of the ohmic voltage drop across the resistance R. Similarly if there is any friction in the bearings there will be mechanical power dissipation. Despite this, the process of electro-mechanical energy transduction is lossless – as we will see in class in a few weeks. We separate out the ideal situation, and handle the dissipative elements separately. Problem 2: In the first two lectures we used the example of a simple automobile cruise-control to demonstrate the concepts of closed-loop proportional control. Now imagine that we have the same automobile, but this time we are developing the new AutoParker car parking system that will stop a car at a fixed distance from the end wall in a garage. A mini radar system is used to monitor the distance from the wall as the car approaches, and to slow it to a stop at a distance xpark. As before, the control system controls the propulsive force Fp(t). If the car is too close the engine will generate a reverse force and move the car back. A control on the dashboard allows the driver to select the distance xpark. F ( t ) d e s i r e d s t o p p i n g p o i n t x x p a r k Using an approach similar to that we used in class (with the same basic mass/friction linear model): (a) Derive a transfer function Gc(s) for the open-loop car, relating the distance travelled,to the engine command φ as we described in class. (b) Draw a block diagram of the feedback control system using the quantities depicted above. Take care to get the signs correct. (c) Derive the closed-loop transfer function for the position controller with a proportional controller with gain Kp. (d) Using whatever method you like determine whether there will be a steady-state error in the response x(t) to a constant command xpark. 2(e) If your answer to (d) is that there is no steady-state error (hint!), think about why there is a steady-state error for the same car under velocity control (as we discussed in class), but not for the position control. Write down your reasons, arguing from from a physical point of view, considering the error and the forces acting on the car. Problem 3: Nise, Chapter 5, Problem 4. Problem 4: Use impedance reduction (parallel/series combination) to find the transfer function of the ripple-filter used in an electronic power supply as shown below. Assume the filter is connected to a resistive load Ro as shown. (The output is the voltage across Ro.) LR + - V ( t ) Cs R o Problem 5: Does the input impedance uniquely characterize a system? Answer the ques-tion by determining the input impedance of the two electrical circuits below: R L 2 R L 2 R 2 R L 0 . 2 5 L R ( a ) ( b )


View Full Document

MIT 2 004 - Problem Set #2

Documents in this Course
Load more
Download Problem Set #2
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view Problem Set #2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view Problem Set #2 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?