Cooperative LearningRoots of Cooperative Learning Can be traced back to 1867 First introduced by educational reformer W.T. Harris Initiated in St. Louis, MO Goal- rapid promotion of elementary studentsFive Defining Elements of Cooperative Learning1. Positive interdependence-a sense of sink or swim together2. Face-to-face promotive interaction-helping each other learn, applauding success and efforts3. Individual and group accountability-each of us has to contribute to the group achieving its goalsFive Defining Elements of Cooperative Learning (con’t)4.Interdependence and small group skills-communication, trust, leadership, decision making, and conflict resolution5.Group processing-reflecting on how well the team is functioning and how to function even betterCooperative Learning Research Results 28 percentile gain (in general) Cooperative vs. intergroup competition = 0 percentile gain Cooperative vs. individual competition = 28 percentile gain Cooperative vs. individual student tasks= 28 percentile gainCooperative Learning3 Generalizations1. Organizing groups on ability levels should be done sparingly Homogenous groups vs. Heterogeneous High ability students: 3 percentile gain Medium ability students: 19 percentile gain Low ability students: -23 percentile gainCooperative Learning3 Generalizations (con’t)2. Cooperative groups should be kept rather small in size Group size of 2 students = 6 percentile gain Group size of 3-4 students = 9 percentile gain Group size of 5-7 students = -1 percentile gainCooperative Learning3 Generalizations (con’t)3. Cooperative learning should be applied consistently and systematically, but not overused Effective when used one time per week Misused when tasks are not well structured Overused when students do not have enough time for individual practice of skills and mastery of processesUse a Variety of Criteria for Grouping Students Interest (same pets, etc. allows common experiences to unify) Birthday month Colors they are wearing Alphabetically Randomly pick names from a hat Use grouping patterns3 Types ofGrouping Patterns1. Informal- Pair-share Turn to your neighbor Can last a few minutes or class period Used to: clarify expectations for tasks Focus students’ attention Allow students time to process more deeply Provide time for closure3 Types ofGrouping Patterns (con’t)2. Formal groups- Designed for students to have enough time to thoroughly complete an academic assignment May last several days or weeks Design tasks to include Positive interdependence Group processing Face to face promotive interaction Individual and group accountability3 Types ofGrouping Patterns (con’t)3. Base groups- Created to provide students support throughout a semester or academic year Routine tasks (check or review homework) Plan activities Run errands Fun activitiesResults: general sense of belonging to classCooperative Learning in the FCS Classroom Foods and Nutrition Parent/Child Development Personal Finance Adult Living Textiles Housing Career ExplorationCooperative LearningObstacles How do you make sure all students contribute to group? Self-assess on specific skills During presentation- Have students demonstrate individual contributions Demonstrate accomplishments of whole groupCooperative LearningConclusion Of all classroom groupings strategies, cooperative learning may be the most flexible and powerful. Teachers can use cooperative learning in a variety of ways in many different
View Full Document