DePaul MGT 555 - Performance Management

Unformatted text preview:

Slide 1Slide 2Analyzing Performance ProblemsJob Performance Measure: Contamination, Validity and DeficiencyWHY Measure Performance?Slide 6WHAT & HOW ?Slide 8WHO?Slide 10Improving Performance FeedbackLegal Requirements of Performance Management SystemsIRWINCHAPTER 7 Performance Management©a Times Mirror Higher Education Group, Inc., company, 1997a Times Mirror Higher Education Group, Inc., company, 1997©a Times Mirror Higher Education Group, Inc., company, 1997a Times Mirror Higher Education Group, Inc., company, 1997IRWINAn Organizational Model of Performance ManagementAn Organizational Model of Performance ManagementOrganizationalStrategyLong & Shortterm goals and valuesIndividual Attributes(skills,abilities)Individual Attributes(skills,abilities)IndividualBehaviorsObjectiveResultsSituationalConstraints- Culture- Economic conditionsSituationalConstraints- Culture- Economic conditionsAnalyzing Performance ProblemsAnalyzing Performance ProblemsDesired PerformanceDesired PerformanceActual PerformanceActual PerformanceIs DifferenceSignificant?What’s the Cause?Lack of Knowledge/Skill Lack of ExecutionHow TO CORRECT?- Feedback- Motivation- Task InterferenceJob Performance Measure:Contamination, Validity and DeficiencyJob Performance Measure:Contamination, Validity and Deficiency©a Times Mirror Higher Education Group, Inc., company, 1997a Times Mirror Higher Education Group, Inc., company, 1997IRWINJobPerformanceMeasureActual JobPerformanceDeficiencyContaminationValidityWHY Measure Performance?WHY Measure Performance?•Strategic•Administrative•Developmental©a Times Mirror Higher Education Group, Inc., company, 1997a Times Mirror Higher Education Group, Inc., company, 1997IRWINThe purposes are:Performance AppraisalPerformance AppraisalPURPOSE:PURPOSE:Developmental AdministrativeImprove PerformanceInformation for:pay increasespromotionsterminationsBASIS FORCOMPARISON :BASIS FORCOMPARISON :Absolute Standard Relative StandardAPPRAISALTECHNIQUE :APPRAISALTECHNIQUE :Results - OrientedBARSRating ScaleROLE OFMANAGER :ROLE OFMANAGER :Counselor JudgeIRWIN©a Times Mirror Higher Education Group, Inc., company, 1997a Times Mirror Higher Education Group, Inc., company, 1997WHAT & HOW ?WHAT & HOW ?•Comparative–ranking–forced distribution–paired comparison•Attribute–graphic rating scales–mixed standard scales•Behavioral–critical incidents–BARS–BOS–OBM–assessment centers•Results–MBO–ProMES•Total Quality Management •Comparative–ranking–forced distribution–paired comparison•Attribute–graphic rating scales–mixed standard scales•Behavioral–critical incidents–BARS–BOS–OBM–assessment centers•Results–MBO–ProMES•Total Quality Management IRWIN©a Times Mirror Higher Education Group, Inc., company, 1997a Times Mirror Higher Education Group, Inc., company, 1997Performance Measurement Approaches©a Times Mirror Higher Education Group, Inc., company, 1997a Times Mirror Higher Education Group, Inc., company, 1997IRWINComparison of Approaches to Performance MeasurementComparison of Approaches to Performance MeasurementApproach Validity Reliability Acceptability SpecificityComparativeAttributeBehavioralResultsTQMpoorlowgoodvery highvery highlowModest Modestlowhigh highhigh highhigh highhighhighhighhighmoderate very highvery lowvery lowhighhighStrategicCongruenceWHO?WHO?•Supervisors•Peers•Subordinates•Self•Customer•Supervisors•Peers•Subordinates•Self•CustomerIRWIN©a Times Mirror Higher Education Group, Inc., company, 1997a Times Mirror Higher Education Group, Inc., company, 1997Rater Errors•Similar to me•Contrast•Distributional errors•Halos / HornsErrors in Performance MeasurementErrors in Performance Measurement©a Times Mirror Higher Education Group, Inc., company, 1997a Times Mirror Higher Education Group, Inc., company, 1997IRWINImproving Performance FeedbackImproving Performance Feedback•Give feedback daily•Have employee do self-evaluation before session•Encourage participation during session•Praise effective performance•Focus on solving problems•Focus feedback on behavior or results•Minimize criticism•Set specific goals and a date to review progress•Give feedback daily•Have employee do self-evaluation before session•Encourage participation during session•Praise effective performance•Focus on solving problems•Focus feedback on behavior or results•Minimize criticism•Set specific goals and a date to review progress©a Times Mirror Higher Education Group, Inc., company, 1997a Times Mirror Higher Education Group, Inc., company, 1997IRWINLegal Requirements ofPerformance Management SystemsLegal Requirements ofPerformance Management Systems•Conduct a valid job analysis related to performance•Base system on specific behaviors or results•Train raters to use system correctly•Review performance ratings and allow for employee appeal•Provide guidance / support for poor performers•Conduct a valid job analysis related to performance•Base system on specific behaviors or results•Train raters to use system correctly•Review performance ratings and allow for employee appeal•Provide guidance / support for poor performers©a Times Mirror Higher Education Group, Inc., company, 1997a Times Mirror Higher Education Group, Inc., company,


View Full Document

DePaul MGT 555 - Performance Management

Download Performance Management
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view Performance Management and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view Performance Management 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?