This copy is for your personal, noncommercial use only. You can order presentation-readycopies for distribution to your colleagues, clients or customers here or use the "Reprints" toolthat appears next to any article. Visit www.nytreprints.com for samples and additionalinformation. Order a reprint of this article now.November 11, 2009Under Attack, Fed Chief Studies PoliticsBy EDMUND L. ANDREWSWASHINGTON — With the Federal Reserve under more intense attack than at any time in decades, Ben S.Bernanke, the professorial chairman of the central bank, was schooled last month in how to handle theincreased political demands of his job.For months, he had warned — without anyone on Capitol Hill appearing to listen — that a seeminglyinnocuous bill to let Congress “audit” the Fed would gravely threaten the central bank’s independence.It was alarming enough that the bill’s author was Representative Ron Paul, the quixotic Texas Republicanwhose new book, “End the Fed,” had just landed on the best-seller lists. Despite vigorous protests by Mr.Bernanke, nearly 300 House lawmakers and 30 senators had endorsed Mr. Paul’s bill.But when he sat down shortly after 8 a.m. on Oct. 1 at the Rayburn House Office Building for coffee andmuffins with Representative Barney Frank, the rumpled and wisecracking chairman of the House FinancialServices Committee, he took in some blunt advice.Voters had become suspicious and unnerved by the Fed because of its trillion-dollar efforts to bail out thefinancial system, Mr. Frank warned. If the Fed really wanted to survive the disgruntlement in both parties,he continued, Mr. Bernanke would have to step back and let him devise a compromise.Reluctantly, the Fed chairman agreed to reduce his own visibility on the issue and let Mr. Frank take thelead.It was just one example of how the Fed has been forced to scramble as its power comes under more firethan at any time in decades.On Tuesday, a new threat opened up: Senator Christopher J. Dodd, chairman of the Senate BankingCommittee, declared that the Fed had been an “abysmal failure” at regulation. He introduced a bill thatwould strip virtually all of its power to regulate banks, including financial institution considered too big tofail.There will be a fight. Mr. Bernanke and the Fed has powerful political supporters, from lawmakers like Mr.Frank and President Obama. But the Fed chairman is being forced to nurture those ties as never before andto carefully map out which battles are worth fighting.“Ben Bernanke turns out to have better political instincts than anybody thought,” Mr. Frank said in aninterview last week. “They accept the fact that I know what I’m doing up here.”Bernanke Learns Flexibility in the Debate Over Fed’s Role - NYTimes.comhttp://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/11/business/11fed.html?sq=Fed%20un...1 of 3 11/30/2009 11:18 AMOn one front, the Fed faces populist anger from both left-wing Democrats and right-wing Republicansabout its power and secrecy. At the same time, officials are locked in brutal but arcane battles about whoshould oversee Wall Street and big banks as Congress tries to pass a sweeping overhaul of financialregulation.Last summer, the central bank hired an experienced Democratic hand and former lobbyist, LindaRobertson, to help deal with members of Congress. Mr. Bernanke alone has met privately with about 40senators and many House members in the last few months, sometimes to dissect arcane policy issues andsometimes just to explain what he does in plain English.At one recent meeting, Senator Sherrod Brown challenged Mr. Bernanke’s bona fides as a regular guy bygiving him a pop quiz on baseball statistics. Mr. Bernanke, a passionate fan, passed.Mindful that Democrats now control the White House and Congress, Mr. Bernanke put up virtually noopposition to President Obama’s proposal for a new consumer agency that would take over the Fed’sauthority over consumer lending issues. Similarly, he avoided a bruising turf battle by agreeing that the Fedwould share responsibility with other regulators to monitor systemic financial risk.But Fed officials have been steely in protecting their two top priorities: the Fed’s political independence onmonetary policy and the Fed’s role as undisputed overseer of financial institutions deemed “too big to fail.”Mr. Bernanke took over the Fed nearly four years ago with less political experience than his predecessor,Alan Greenspan. And because he was forced to bail out companies and credit markets in such visible ways,Mr. Bernanke has enjoyed little of the mystique and distance that Mr. Greenspan used to his advantage.No fight illustrates Mr. Bernanke’s political challenge better than the one over Mr. Paul’s bill to audit theFed.The maneuvering is still under way, involving intricate negotiations outside of public view. But, aided bythe pledge of help from Mr. Frank and backing from the administration, Fed officials cautiously predictthey will get what they want.Mr. Paul’s bill would require the Government Accountability Office, an arm of the Congress, to complete awide-ranging assessment of the Fed’s financial operations by the end of 2010. The audit would delve intobailouts of individual firms, short-term loans to banks, currency swaps with foreign central banks and theFed’s effort to prop up mortgage lending by purchasing $1.25 trillion in mortgage-related securities.Mr. Bernanke initially reacted to the bill in almost apocalyptic terms. The G.A.O. audits, he told a Househearing in late June, could lead to a Congressional “takeover” of monetary policy that would be “highlydestructive to the stability of the financial system, the dollar and our national economic situation.”That did not go over well with many lawmakers, who were competing to describe the Fed in dark andconspiratorial tones.Senator Jim DeMint, a conservative Republican from South Carolina, denounced the Fed on the Senatefloor in July as an “unelected central bank” that enjoyed a “monopoly over the flow of our money” andoperated in “almost complete secrecy.”Bernanke Learns Flexibility in the Debate Over Fed’s Role - NYTimes.comhttp://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/11/business/11fed.html?sq=Fed%20un...2 of 3 11/30/2009 11:18 AMSenator Bernie Sanders, a left-leaning independent from Vermont who sponsored a Senate version of Mr.Paul’s bill, attacked the Fed for being beholden mainly to Wall Street.“People are frightened,” Mr.