DOC PREVIEW
UCSB ECE 178 - Required Reading

This preview shows page 1-2-3-4 out of 12 pages.

Save
View full document
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 12 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 12 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 12 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 12 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 12 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

Local Enhancement 1 Averaging Fig 3.30 and Uncorrelated zero meanduces the noise variance2 22g x y f x y x yg x yMg x yE g x y f x yMx yx yx yiiMg( , ) ( , ) ( , )( , ) ( , )( ( , )) ( , ) ( , )( , )( , ) Re= +== =→→=∑ησ σησηη111Spatial Filtering Chapter 3 Required Reading: All sections except 3.8 Local Enhancement 2Image Forensics Project Guidelines • Process • Images Local Enhancement 3 Local Enhancement 4 Fig 3.30Local Enhancement 5 Another example Images with additive Gausian Noise; Independent Samples. I=imnoise(J,’Gaussian’); Local Enhancement 6 Averaged image Left: averaged image (10 samples); Right: original imageLocal Enhancement 7 Spatial filtering Frequency Spatial 0 LPF HPF BPF Local Enhancement 8 Smoothing (Low Pass) Filtering ω1"ω2"ω3"ω4"ω5"ω6"ω7"ω8"ω9"f1 f2 f3 (x,y) Replace f (x,y) with Linear filter LPF: reduces additive noise blurs the image  sharpness details are lost (Example: Local averaging) Fig 3.35 f x y fiii^( , ) =∑ωLocal Enhancement 9 Fig 3.35: smoothing Local Enhancement 10 Fig 3.36: another exampleLocal Enhancement 11 Image Dithering • Dithering: to produce visually pleasing signals from heavily quantized data. – Halftoning: convert a gray scale image to a binary image by thresholding. – Dithering to “add” noise so that the resulting image is smoother than just thresholding (but still it is a binary image) – Your homework #4 explores this further with a MATLAB exercise. Local Enhancement 12 Median filtering Replace f (x,y) with median [ f (x’ , y’) ] (x’ , y’) E neighbourhood • Useful in eliminating intensity spikes. ( salt & pepper noise) • Better at preserving edges. Example: 10" 20" 20"20" 15" 20"25" 20" 100"( 10,15,20,20,20,20,20,25,100) Median=20 So replace (15) with (20)Local Enhancement 13 Median Filter: Root Signal Local Enhancement 14 Invariant Signals Invariant signals to a median filter: Constant Monotonically increasing decreasing length?Local Enhancement 15 Fig 3.37: Median Filtering example Local Enhancement 16 Media Filter: another example Original and with salt & pepper noise imnoise(image, ‘salt & pepper’);Local Enhancement 17 Donoised images Local averaging K=filter2(fspecial(‘average’,3),image)/255. Median filtered L=medfil2(image, [3 3]); Local Enhancement 18 Sharpening Filters • Enhance finer image details (such as edges) • Detect region /object boundaries. -1" -1" -1"-1" 8" -1"-1" -1" -1"Example:Local Enhancement 19 Unsharp Masking Subtract Low pass filtered version from the original emphasizes high frequency information I’ = A ( Original) - Low pass HP = O - LP A > 1 I’ = ( A - 1 ) O + HP A = 1 => I’ = HP A > 1 => LF components added back. Local Enhancement 20 Derivative Filters -1" -1" -1"-1" ω" -1"-1" -1" -1"1/9 Gradient ∇f =∂f∂x∂f∂yT∇f =∂f∂x2+∂f∂y212Local Enhancement 21 Edge Detection Gradient based methods x x0 x x0 f(x) f’(x) x x0 f “(x) f(x) d(.)/dx | . | Threshold f’(x) |f’(x)| < > Local max No Yes X0 is an edge Not an edge X0 not an edge ∇f =∂f∂x∂f∂yTLocal Enhancement 22 Digital edge detectors z1 z3 z4 z5 z6 z7 z8 z9 z2 Robert’s operator 1 0 0 -1 0 1 -1 0 prewitt | z5-z9 | | z6-z8 | -1 -1 -1 0 0 0 1 1 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 0 1 Sobel’s -1 -2 -1 0 0 0 1 2 1 -1 0 1 -2 0 2 -1 0 1 ∇f ≈ z5− z8( )2+ z5− z6( )212∇f ≈ z5− z8+ z5− z6Local Enhancement 23 Fig 3.45: Sobel edge detector Local Enhancement 24 Laplacian based edge detectors 1 1 -4 1 1 • Rotationally symmetric, linear operator • Check for the zero crossings to detect edges • Second derivatives => sensitive to noise. ∇ =


View Full Document

UCSB ECE 178 - Required Reading

Download Required Reading
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view Required Reading and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view Required Reading 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?