LECTURE 12 Last time: Strong coding theorem • Revisiting channel and codes • Bound on probability of error • Error exponent • Lecture outline Error exponent behavior • Expunging bad codewords • Error exponent positivity • Strong coding theorem •� Last time Ecodebooks[Pe,m] ≤ 2−N(E0(ρ,PX (x))−ρR) for E0(ρ, PX(x)) ⎡⎣⎤⎦ 1+ρ 1� PX(x)PY X (yix)1+ρ− log = | ⎛ ⎜⎝ | y xN We need to: get rid of the expectation over codes • by throwing out the worst half of the codes Show that the bound behaves well (ex-• ponent is −Nα for some α > 0) Relate the bound to capacity • ⎞ ⎟⎠Error exponent Define Er(R) = max0≤ρ≤1 maxPX (E0(ρ, PX(x)) −ρR) then Ecodebooks[Pe,m] ≤ 2−NEr(R) Ecodebooks,messages[Pe] ≤ 2−NEr(R) For a BSC:Expunge codewords The new Pe,m is bounded as follows: Pe,m 2.2−NEr(max0≤ρ≤1 maxPX (E0(ρ,PX (x))−ρlog(2M)))= N = 2.2−NEr(max0≤ρ≤1 maxPX (E0(ρ,PX (x))−Nρ −ρlog(M)))N 4.2−NEr(max0≤ρ≤1 maxPX (E0(ρ,PX (x))−ρlog(M )))≤ 4.2−NEr(R) N = Now we must consider positivity. Let PX(x) be such that I(X; Y ) > 0, we’ll show that the behavior of Er is:Error exponent positivity We have that: 1. E0(ρ, PX(x)) > 0, ∀ρ > 0 2. I(X; Y ) ≥ ∂E0(ρ,PX (x)) > 0, ∀ρ > 0∂ρ 3. ∂2E0(ρ,PX (x)) ≤ 0, ∀ρ > 0 ∂ρ2 We can check that I(X; Y ) = ∂E0(ρ,PX (x)) ∂ρ |ρ=0 then showing 3 will establish the LHS of 2 Showing the RHS of 2 will establish 1 Let us show 3Error exponent positivity To show concavity, we need to show that ∀ρ1, ρ2 ∀θ ∈ [0, 1] E0(ρ3, PX(x)) ≥ θE0(ρ1, PX(x)) + (1 − θ)E0(ρ2, PX(x)) for ρ3= θρ1+ θρ2 We shall use the fact that θ(1+ρ1) (1−θ)(1+ρ2) + = 1 1+ρ3 1+ρ3 and H¨older’s inequality: �1 �x �1 �1−x �j cjdj ≤ �j cjx �j cj 1−xLet us pick θ(1+ρ3) θ cj = PX(j) 1+ρ3 PY X(k j)1+ρ3 (1−θ)(1+rho|2) |1−θ dj = PX(j) 1+ρ3 PY X(k j)1+ρ3 ||θ(1 + ρ1) x = 1 + ρ3� Error exponent positivity Proof continued 1 PX(j)PY X(k j)1+ρ3 ||j∈X θ(1+ρ1) 1+ρ3 ≤ × ⎛⎝⎛⎝⎞⎠ 1+ρ1� PX(j)PY |X(k|j)1 j∈X (1−θ)(1+ρ2) 1+ρ3 ⎞⎠ 1+ρ2� PX(j)PY |X(k|j)1 j∈X ⇒ ⎛⎝ ⎞⎠ 1+ρ3 ||1+ρ3� PX(j)PY X(k j)1 j∈X ⎛⎝⎛⎝≤ × ⎞⎠ θ(1+ρ1) 1+ρ1� PX(j)PY |X(k|j)1 j∈X 1+ρ2� PX(j)PY |X(k|j)1 j∈X ⎞⎠ (1−θ)(1+ρ2)� � Error exponent positivity Proof continued ⎛⎝ ⎞⎠ 1+ρ3 ||1+ρ3� PX(j)PY X(k j)1 ⇒ k∈Y j∈X ⎛⎝ ⎞⎠ θ(1+ρ1) 1+ρ1� PX(j)PY X(k|j)1 ≤ × | k∈Y � PX(j)PY |X(k|j)1+1 ρ2 ⎛⎝j∈X ⎞⎠ (1−θ)(1+ρ2) j∈X �⎣⎡⎢k∈Y ⎤ ⎥⎦ θ ⎛⎝ ⎞⎠ (1+ρ1) 1+ρ1� PX(j)PY X(k|j)1 ≤ | j∈X ⎡ ⎢⎣ ⎤ ⎥⎦ (1−θ) ⎛⎝ ⎞⎠ (1+ρ2) ||1+ρ2� PX(j)PY X(k j)1 × j∈X� � Error exponent positivity Proof continued k∈Y ⎛ ⎜⎝⎞ ⎟⎠ ⎛⎝ ⎞⎠ 1+ρ3 1+ρ3� PX(j)PY X(k j)1 − log | | j∈X 1+ρ1� PX(j)PY X(k j)1⎛⎝⎞ ⎟⎠ ⎞⎠ (1+ρ1) ≥ −θ log ⎛ ⎜⎝ | | k∈Y⎛⎝1+ρ2� PX(j)PY X(k j)1 j∈X ⎞ ⎟⎠ ⎞⎠ (1+ρ2) − (1 − θ) | ⎛ ⎜⎝ | j∈X ⇒ E0(ρ3, PX) ≥ θE0(ρ1, PX) + (1 − θ)E0(ρ2, PX) so E0 is concave!Error exponent positivity Proof continued Hence, extremum, if it exists, of E0(ρ, PX)−∂E0(ρ,PX )ρR over ρ occurs at ∂ρ = R, which implies that ∂E0(ρ,PX ) ∂E0(ρ,PX )= I(X; Y )∂ρ |ρ=1 ≤ R ≤ |ρ=0∂ρ is necessary for Er(R, PX) = max0≤ρ≤1[E0(ρ, PX)−ρR] to have a maximum We have now placed mutual information somewhere in the expression Critical rate is RCR is defined as ∂E0(ρ,PX ) ∂ρ |ρ=1Error exponent positivity Proof continued From ∂E0(ρ,PX )= R∂ρ we obtain ∂R = ∂2E0(ρ,PX ) ∂ρ ∂ρ2 Hence ∂R < 0, R decreases monotonically ∂ρ from C to RCR We can write Er(R, PX) = E0(ρ, PX) − ρ∂E0(ρ,PX ) ∂ρ for Er(R, PX) = E0(ρ, PX) − ρR (ρ allows parametric relation) then ∂Er(R,PX ) ∂2E0(ρ,PX ) = −ρ > 0∂ρ ∂ρ2Error exponent positivity Proof continued Taking the ratio of the derivatives, ∂Er(R,PX )= ∂R −ρ Er(R, PX) is positive for R < C Moreover ∂2Er(R,PX )= −[∂2E0(ρ,PX )]−1 > 0 ∂R2 ∂ρ2 thus Er(R, PX) is convex and decreasing in R over RCR < R < CError exponent positivity Proof continued Taking Er(R) = maxPX Er(R, PX) is the maximum of functions that are con-vex and decreasing in R and so is also con-vex For the PX that yields capacity, Er(R, PX) is positive for R < C So we have positivity of error exponent for 0 < R < C and capacity has been intro-duced This completes the coding theorem Note: there are degenerate cases in which ∂Er(R,PX )= constant and ∂2Er(R,PX )= 0 ∂ρ ∂2ρ when would that happen?MIT OpenCourseWarehttp://ocw.mit.edu 6.441 Information Theory Spring 2010 For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use, visit:
View Full Document