August 2010* reflects GWP & Emission Factors Energy Conservation Measures - ongoing energy audits, energy saving renovations, appropriate technologies, facilities upgrades, etc.  Alternative Energy Projects - onsite, stand-alone, clean & renewable energy projects designed to power existing structures  Green-Building Energy Systems - systems design of new construction to meet space needs with a focus on integrated, multi-component, clean & renewable energy systems complimented by ultra efficient building envelopes allowing excess energy to flow to other buildings. Focus on biomass and CHP.  Campus Action - campaigns among students, staff, and faculty for increased awareness, reducing waste, new purchasing policies, web presence, etc  !Forest Carbon Sequestration - proper designation and management of certain ESF forest properties inline with Chicago Climate Exchange & GHG Protocol standards.New “zero net energy” showcase building for campus. Design includes biomass combined heat and power, PV, green roof, passive solar and rain gardens.Gateway Building Energy Efficiency 8,000 MBtu CHP Wood Pellet Steam Boiler  8,000 MBtu CHP Natural Gas Boiler  200 kW Back-pressure steam turbine  30 kW CHP Biodiesel Micro-turbine  Dual 65 kW CHP Natural Gas Micro-turbines  150-200 kW Solar PV array CHP System is a 25% improvement in efficiency  Offset 54,000 MMBTU Fossil Fuels Annually ◦ 18,000 MMBTU from efficiency improvements ◦ 36,000 MMBTU from fuel switching improvement  System is projected to save ESF $450,000 annually, and provides a $1.5 million NPV over 15 years Combined Heat and Power System 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Heating Needs (Main Campus) Electric Needs (Total) GHG Offsets Total % Met by GatewayCranberry Lake Biological Field Station & Charles Lathrop Pack Experimental Forest SUNY ESF  Final Step toward Carbon Neutrality  Maximization of existing resources eliminates the need for purchased offsets  6,000+ MTCO2e sequestered annually  Designation and management practices inline with Chicago Climate Exchange and GHG Protocol Standards Forest Name Location Acreage Annual MTCO2e/acre Net Annual MTCO2e Pack Demonstration Forest Warrensburg, NY 2,181 3.03 6,612 Heiberg Memorial Forest Tully, NY 1,486 2.54 3,6467 Heiberg Memorial Forest, Tully NYThree-year old after coppice One-year old after coppice Coppice First year growth Site Preparation Planting Early spring after coppicing Harvesting Energy – renewable generation and energy savings are more than 30 times fossil fuel invested to implement.  Environmental – Over the life of the projects we expect to offset 478,000 MT CO2e.  Economic – The investment required is $14 m (offset by grants and incentives). The projected to savings are $1.2 m annually.Remain a leader & innovator of Sustainability & Climate Focused...  Education  Research  Outreach  Partnerships  Community Service Encourage campus awareness & involvement with sustainability projects.  Publicize & expand sustainability efforts to the local community and beyond.  Monitor progress and adjust goals and plans as appropriate  Continue to grow ESF’s portfolio of sustainability