DOC PREVIEW
Berkeley CIVENG 165 - Bancroft Library Retrofit

This preview shows page 1-2-3-24-25-26 out of 26 pages.

Save
View full document
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 26 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 26 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 26 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 26 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 26 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 26 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 26 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

Bancroft Library RetrofitBancroft Library RetrofitMichael Wong, Jeffery Ho,Jennifer Ahlport, Moises MalongMichael Wong, Jeffery Ho,Jennifer Ahlport, Moises MalongCE 165 - April 19, 2007Original Bancroft LibraryOriginal Bancroft Library Collection started by Hobert Howe Bancroft and sold to UC Berkeley in 1894 Originally Built in 1949 Bancroft Library is housed in the Doe Annex Collection worth $1 billion Collection started by Hobert Howe Bancroft and sold to UC Berkeley in 1894 Originally Built in 1949 Bancroft Library is housed in the Doe Annex Collection worth $1 billionLocationLocationFundingFunding Total cost: $55 million Construction cost: $45 million $32 million funded by State for seismic upgrade $23 million funded by private donations for added security Total cost: $55 million Construction cost: $45 million $32 million funded by State for seismic upgrade $23 million funded by private donations for added securityScope Of ProjectScope Of Project Interior Shear walls with footings Remove 3 levels of tiers Renovation of interior spaces New Bookshelving System Beams New elevators Floor slabs Entrance Ramp and Stairway Upgrade HVAC, security, etc Interior Shear walls with footings Remove 3 levels of tiers Renovation of interior spaces New Bookshelving System Beams New elevators Floor slabs Entrance Ramp and Stairway Upgrade HVAC, security, etcCompanies InvolvedCompanies InvolvedArchitectEngineerContractorSubcontractorConcrete supplierArchitectEngineerContractorSubcontractorConcrete supplier Ratcliff Degenkolb McCarthy Johnson Western Gunite CEMEX Ratcliff Degenkolb McCarthy Johnson Western Gunite CEMEXProject TimelineProject Timeline Entire Project: April 2006 - April 2008 Entire Project: April 2006 - April 20082006 2007 2008Soft DemolitionApr-SeptShotcrete Shearwall Dec-FebEnd of Project AprilBeam Casting Jan-AprHard DemolitionAug-FebBasement Slab Pouring beginsMayOutside Stairs and Ramps begin DecDemolitionDemolition Soft Demolition: April - September 2006 Walls, doors, mechanical systems Hard Demolition: August 2006 - February 2007 Done between 6pm and 2am Floors, tiers, elevator shafts Check for poisonous content like asbestos & mercury Soft Demolition: April - September 2006 Walls, doors, mechanical systems Hard Demolition: August 2006 - February 2007 Done between 6pm and 2am Floors, tiers, elevator shafts Check for poisonous content like asbestos & mercuryNew Elevator ShaftsNew Elevator Shafts Marked off dimensions Jackhammered slab starting at center to edge Cut off rebar with concrete saw Sanded vertical faces Marked off dimensions Jackhammered slab starting at center to edge Cut off rebar with concrete saw Sanded vertical facesSeismic Upgrade:Shear WallSeismic Upgrade:Shear Wall Originally there was no form of lateral resistance in the building Primary Method forSeismic Stability Added from basement to 4th floor Originally there was no form of lateral resistance in the building Primary Method forSeismic Stability Added from basement to 4th floorShear Wall - TimelineShear Wall - Timeline Shear wall placement was started Dec. 2006 Each wall was shot in a single day to avoid cold joints Each floor took 1-2 weeks to complete They started on the basement floor and worked their way up to the 4th floor Shear wall placement was started Dec. 2006 Each wall was shot in a single day to avoid cold joints Each floor took 1-2 weeks to complete They started on the basement floor and worked their way up to the 4th floorShotcrete - What is it?Shotcrete - What is it? Concrete shot out of nozzle with pneumatic air Sprayed in layers approximately 4’’ thick each pass until reaching desired thickness Placement consolidates concrete so no vibration required Concrete shot out of nozzle with pneumatic air Sprayed in layers approximately 4’’ thick each pass until reaching desired thickness Placement consolidates concrete so no vibration requiredShear Wall: Mix DesignShear Wall: Mix Design Type II/V cement used f’c= 5000 psi Slump of 2’’ desired Unit weight = 145.4 lbs/cu ft W/C ratio of .42 15% fly ash (F) used 1/2’’ aggregate used Type II/V cement used f’c= 5000 psi Slump of 2’’ desired Unit weight = 145.4 lbs/cu ft W/C ratio of .42 15% fly ash (F) used 1/2’’ aggregate usedShear Walls - PreppingShear Walls - Prepping Both columns & beams had to be prepped before a shear wall could be placed Columns had to be chipped until rebar was exposed Base of beams had to be chipped out Rebar was epoxied into existing columns  Both columns & beams had to be prepped before a shear wall could be placed Columns had to be chipped until rebar was exposed Base of beams had to be chipped out Rebar was epoxied into existing columnsMoat WallMoat Wall Monolithic wall inside perimeter of exterior wall In place on 1st floor to protect collection against moisture Fans had to be running during construction to make sure that walls do not absorb VOCs Problems: cracks & shotcrete issues Monolithic wall inside perimeter of exterior wall In place on 1st floor to protect collection against moisture Fans had to be running during construction to make sure that walls do not absorb VOCs Problems: cracks & shotcrete issuesMoat Wall - CracksMoat Wall - Cracks Found cracks running along rebar in moat wall Afraid of decreased strength, so took 3 core samples to test All samples came up above required strength Refinish Face Found cracks running along rebar in moat wall Afraid of decreased strength, so took 3 core samples to test All samples came up above required strength Refinish FacePoor Shotcrete PlacementPoor Shotcrete Placement Voids behind rebar in moat wall Due to shotcrete spraying perpendicular to rebar Avoided in newly placed shotcrete Voids behind rebar in moat wall Due to shotcrete spraying perpendicular to rebar Avoided in newly placed shotcreteBeam FrameworkBeam Framework Beam shoring started on bottom floor After 7 days of curing additional shoring was added to support floor above Beam shoring started on bottom floor After 7 days of curing additional shoring was added to support floor


View Full Document

Berkeley CIVENG 165 - Bancroft Library Retrofit

Download Bancroft Library Retrofit
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view Bancroft Library Retrofit and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view Bancroft Library Retrofit 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?