4.1 APPENDIX B - FORMSegr345 lab guide - 4.14.1 APPENDIX B - FORMSSkills Self EvaluationYour Name:Hands-on Mechanical:12345none proficientPersonal/Technical Strengths:Hands-on Electrical:12345Hands-on Computer Usage:12345Mathematical Problem Solving:12345Writing:12345The ability to build components with wood, plastic, metal or other materials.CAD, Spreadsheets, creating web pages, etc.Basic wiring skills, soldering, etc.Ability to formulate and solve complex problemsLayout and write complex documentsTeamwork Skills:12345The ability to work with others in a team environment.Personal/Technical Weaknesses:Hands-on Computer Application:12345Programming and computer interfacingLeadership Skills:12345The ability to act as a role model that teammates will follow.People you would NOT like to work with:People you would like to work with:Design Skills:12345Work in unstructured/semistructured problem solving.Other Items of Interest:Other Commitments (courses, work, etc. - give hours for each)egr345 lab guide - 4.2EGR 101 / 345 Project Peer EvaluationYour Name:Team Number: ____________________Person Being Evaluated:Communicates well:12345good poorWould you hire this person: yes / noWorks in team environment:12345Meets deadlines:12345Quality of work:12345Overall:12345Did the teammate return e-mails and other forms of communication promptly? Could the teammate understand, explain and evaluate the technical aspects of the project in a clear concise manner?Did you teammate complete individual tasks on time? Did the teammate keep the project progressing forward in a timely manner with a consistent effort throughout the project or was the teammate only available when the team was in trouble?Did your teammate come to meetings on time? Did the teammate participate in all aspects of the project? How much did the teammate’s efforts contribute to the overall success of the project?Was you r teammate willing to accept and carry out individual tasks on time? How well were these individual tasks carried out? Did your teammate do his or her fair share of the work?Would you be happy working with the person again? Would you give this person a job reference?Other Comments:egr345 lab guide - 4.3Competition Check SheetTeam:Mass:not including the handlebarsCost:proof of costsBuild Quality:assigned by judges. 0=worst, 1=bestTechnical Analysis:0=worst, 1=bestLargest Dimension:Hits:The points scored in a 2 minute interval.Notes:M = KgC =$B =01,[]T =01,[]L = inH =Overall Score:based upon other valuesSCORE =Meets requirements:fits in 12" cube, self contained, not dangerous.....YES / NOscore H2–4()C80------10()B–10()T–2()L3---M4=Class: EGR 101 / EGR 345Round12345Points for Points againstegr345 lab guide - 4.4EGR 345 Project Judging - ProfessionalismYour Name:Team Number:excellent poor01 71234567891011Work Quality:average23456 891001 723456 891001 723456 891001 723456 891001 723456 891001 723456 891001 723456 891001 723456 891001 723456 891001 723456 891001 723456
View Full Document