5. Farrah and McClellan's model of category-specific deficitsMajor idea was that the cortex self-organizes on a neural network model, self-organized such that representations of living and non-living things in the semantic memory.Actual function of the model is not necessary for the midterm16. Slightly revision to d' nswer: both examples I gave of extraneous variables that would impact your choice of sensitivity were from the cost-payoff matrix. There is also the consideration of signal probability.17. For the question on evolution of alphabet, mention the experiment that removing edges and vertices impaired recognition of letters (bolsters support that they have evolved to maximize NAP differences).23. The Jeniffer Aniston cell is not facial recognition, but semantic knowledge of J.A., as it responds to the concept of her.Things to consider for part II:Slideshow 6:Learning, binding, and consolidationSlides 25-27 of memory, the results show that the LIFG triggers for encoding, and no difference in motor cortex or v1 cells shows that there is no priming effect going on in these regions (double dissoc.)Slideshow 7 and 7a:Slide 7 of language, lesion results for object namingStages of speech production (semantic features -> lexical nodes --> phonological segments)fMRI experiment, when people think about how to do something, activation in premotor and posterior parietal cortex. When think about why to do something, activation in posterior Superior Temporal Sulcus.Garden path model of syntactic processing: minimal syntactic nodes, late attachment (Ppt 7, slide 54)P600 is a positive peak, 600 ms after audition, that responds to lexically-primed cues in the IFG.experimental design for consistent variable mapping (automaticity slides, 7a)Slideshow 8:Apraxia: failure to recognize skilled movements, a result of lesions to the left posterior parietal lobe. Left hemisphere selectively activated for motor planning.Translation-dependency of attention:Shown an image, say an elephant above a bus. Then show again, either same, or the pattern translated, or the bus over the elephant, or the bus over the elephant and the combo translated. Translation did not change fMRI-a, however changing the relation caused it to light up. (Translation invariance in LOC).Slideshow 9:Infovore argument (emotion slides, 9)03/11/2011 05:24:00← 5. Farrah and McClellan's model of category-specific deficits← Major idea was that the cortex self-organizes on a neural networkmodel, self-organized such that representations of living and non-living things in the semantic memory.← Actual function of the model is not necessary for the midterm←← 16. Slightly revision to d' nswer: both examples I gave of extraneous variables that would impact your choice of sensitivity were from the cost-payoff matrix. There is also the consideration of signal probability.←← 17. For the question on evolution of alphabet, mention the experiment that removing edges and vertices impaired recognition of letters (bolsters support that they have evolved to maximize NAP differences).←← 23. The Jeniffer Aniston cell is not facial recognition, but semantic knowledge of J.A., as it responds to the concept of her.←←←← Things to consider for part II:← Slideshow 6:← Learning, binding, and consolidation← Slides 25-27 of memory, the results show that the LIFG triggers for encoding, and no difference in motor cortex or v1 cells shows that there is no priming effect going on in these regions (double dissoc.)← Slideshow 7 and 7a:← Slide 7 of language, lesion results for object naming← Stages of speech production (semantic features -> lexical nodes --> phonological segments)← fMRI experiment, when people think about how to do something, activation in premotor and posterior parietal cortex. When think about why to do something, activation in posterior Superior Temporal Sulcus.← Garden path model of syntactic processing: minimal syntactic nodes, late attachment (Ppt 7, slide 54)← P600 is a positive peak, 600 ms after audition, that responds to lexically-primed cues in the IFG.← experimental design for consistent variable mapping (automaticity slides, 7a)← Slideshow 8:← Apraxia: failure to recognize skilled movements, a result of lesions to the left posterior parietal lobe. Left hemisphere selectively activated for motor planning.← Translation-dependency of attention:← Shown an image, say an elephant above a bus. Then show again, either same, or the pattern translated, or the bus over the elephant, or the bus over the elephant and the combo translated. Translation did not change fMRI-a, however changing the relation caused it to light up. (Translation invariance in LOC).← Slideshow 9:← Infovore argument (emotion slides,