Unformatted text preview:

Speech Perception in Dyslexic Children With and Without Language Impairments* Frank Manis, Dept. Psychology, USC Patricia Keating, Dept. Linguistics, UCLA Developmental dyslexia refers to a group of children who fail to learn to read at the normal rate despite apparently normal vision and neurological functioning. Dyslexic children typically manifest problems in printed word recognition and spelling, and difficulties in phonological processing are quite common (Lyon, 1995; Rack, Snowling, & Olson, 1992; Stanovich, 1988; Wagner & Torgesen, 1987). The phonological processing problems include, but are not limited to difficulties in pronouncing nonsense words, poor phonemic awareness, problems in representing phonological information in short-term memory and difficulty in rapidly retrieving the names of familiar objects, digits and letters (Stanovich, 1988; Wagner & Torgesen, 1987; Wolf & Bowers, 1999). The underlying cause of phonological deficits in dyslexic children is not yet clear. One possible source is developmentally deviant perception of speech at the phoneme level. A number of studies have shown that dyslexics' categorizations of speech sounds are less sharp than normal readers (Chiappe, Chiappe, & Siegel, 2001; Godfrey, Syrdal-Lasky, Millay, & Knox, 1981; Maassen, Groenen, Crul, Assman-Hulsmans, & Gabreels, 2001; Reed, 1989; Serniclaes, Sprenger-Charolles, Carré, & Demonet, 2001;Werker & Tees, 1987). These group differences have appeared in tasks requiring the labeling of stimuli varying along a perceptual continuum (such as voicing or place of articulation), as well as on speech discrimination tasks. In two studies, there was evidence that dyslexics showed better discrimination of sounds differing phonetically within a category boundary (Serniclaes et al, 2001; Werker & Tees, 1987), whereas in one study, dyslexics were poorer at both within-phoneme and between phoneme discrimination (Maassen et al, 2001). There is evidence that newborns and 6-month olds with a familial risk for dyslexia have reduced sensitivity to speech and non-speech sounds (Molfese, 2000; Pihko, Leppanen, Eklund, Cheour, Guttorm & Lyytinen, 1999). If dyslexics are impaired from birth in auditory processing, or more specifically in speech perception, this would affect the development and use of phonological representations on a wide variety of tasks, most intensively in phonological awareness and decoding. Although differences in speech perception have been observed, it has also been noted that the effects are often weak, small in size or shown by only some of the dyslexic subjects (Adlard & Hazan, 1998; Brady, Shankweiler, & Mann, 1983; Elliot, Scholl, Grant, & Hammer, 1990; Manis, McBride-Chang, Seidenberg, Keating, Doi, Munson, & Petersen (1997); Nittrouer, 1999; Snowling, Goulandris, Bowlby, & Howell, 1986). One reason for small, or variable effects, might be that the dyslexic population is heterogeneous, and that speech perception problems are more common among particular subgroups of dyslexics. A specific hypothesis is that speech perception problems are more concentrated among dyslexic children showing greater * To appear in The Connections between Language and Reading Disabilities, ed. Hugh Catts and Alan Kamhi, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates (2005). UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics, No. 103, 30-47phonological deficits. McBride-Chang (1996) reported structural equation analyses indicating that speech perception was not directly related to word recognition among third graders. Instead, phoneme awareness acted as a mediator for the relationship of speech perception and word reading. She proposed that poor perception of the phoneme might impede the development of phoneme awareness, which in turn interfered with early word decoding and word reading development. Evidence in support of this view was provided by Manis et al. (1997). They tested older (age 10-14 years) dyslexic children who had serious delays in word recognition, but who varied in the degree of deficit in phoneme awareness. About half of the sample of dyslexics fell within the normal range for chronological age on a measure of phoneme awareness. Manis et al. (1997) found that dyslexics with low phoneme awareness were more likely to have speech perception deficits on a task requiring them to identify /b/ vs. /p/ on the basis of VOT. Five of the thirteen cases with low phoneme awareness had abnormal categorical perception functions, as opposed to only two of the twelve cases with normal phoneme awareness. Only one of 25 cases in the CA group and three of 24 cases in the RL group showed abnormal categorical perception, and these were minor deviations from normal compared to what was seen in the low phoneme awareness subgroup. It is possible that past studies finding a significant group difference in speech perception had a greater concentration of dyslexic children with problems in phonological awareness. However, findings inconsistent with this viewpoint have been reported. Nittrouer (1999) studied a sample of poor readers with considerable phonological difficulties, but failed to observe deficits in auditory processing or speech perception. Another possibility is that speech perception difficulties might be more common among dyslexics with broader impairments in language. The selection criteria used in past studies of dyslexia (e.g., typically scores within the normal range on a full-scale IQ test or on a short-form of the IQ test) allow for the possibility that some dyslexics have mild to moderate language delays. There is strong evidence that speech perception problems are implicated in children categorized as specific language impaired (SLI) (Elliot & Hammer, 1988; Stark & Heinz, 1996; Tallal & Stark, 1980; 1982; Thibodeau & Sussman, 1979). Many, but not all SLI children tend to be dyslexic (Catts, Fey, Tomblin, & Zhang, 2002; Kamhi & Catts, 1986; Goulandris, Snowling, & Walker, 2000). The purpose of the studies described in this paper was to investigate the relationships among reading difficulties, phonological processing, language impairments and speech perception. We first present data from Joanisse, Manis, Keating & Seidenberg (2000), including re-analyses of the data, as well as data from a follow-up study on the same subjects, administered a year later. Dyslexia and Specific Language Impairment The specific question we address in this paper is why speech perception difficulties are


View Full Document

UCLA LING 103 - 3-ManisKeatingSpeech Perception

Download 3-ManisKeatingSpeech Perception
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view 3-ManisKeatingSpeech Perception and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view 3-ManisKeatingSpeech Perception 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?