DOC PREVIEW
Berkeley ESPM 169 - Lecture Notes

This preview shows page 1 out of 4 pages.

Save
View full document
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 4 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 4 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

Lecture on International Cooperation September 2, 2003 - Playing Well With Others?ESPM 169: International PoliticsLecture on International Cooperation September 2, 2003 - Playing Well With Others? last week: trends pressuring the global environment: industrialization, aftermath of colonization, globalization: also growing global/environmental impact of conflict today: intro to international cooperation and international law - Simmons and Oudraat - political problems; Susskind - problems with international environmental legal processes Ice breaker exercise (separate file)International Cooperation1. What is cooperation? - Deliberate coordination of policies by national governments, usually via a treaty2. Why is cooperation necessary for global environmental protection? Environmental policy problems enhanced at the international level:- Environmental problems do not respect international boundaries - problems generated in one country affect others; problems generated by all countries affect the global ecosystem - ecological interdependence - globalization- Some countries can’t manage their own problems and need help- The lack of an overarching authority (legal and coercive) in the international system means that states need to make a deliberate effort to coordinate their policies - lack of coordination, even with good intentions, thus losing out on mutual gains - pot-luck analogy EG: food for a community dinner/potluck; what if everyone brings jello moulds? Or people free-ride? ways out of this dilemma: command and control, someone provides dinner, informal coordination - sign-up, e-mail which of these options are available/feasible internationally?Now: I'm assuming there you don't really know each other. But what if you did? This may make the coordination problem easier (groups can get together and plan; you've an interest in continuing to interact nicely) or it can make it harder (you're aware of who's richer than others, or who tends to freeload, or who has a super-fast metabolism) - in that case, more rules are needed, and more conflicts - human society: tends to be on the nicer side (but not always) - emphasis on manners, socialization - society of states: history of conflict, war, misunderstanding - therefore, knowing each other makes it harder this is a BIG difference in IR theory - camps with different views of the world - "society of states", able to be socialized vs. set of atomistic, selfish individuals - "war of all against all"3. What forms does it take on? - Regimes: governance without government - i.e. systems of agreements, rules, norms, practices governing international interaction and regulating national actions within a given issue area thus, there are regimes for biodiversity, whaling, wastes, climate change, human rights, trade, etc. Regime Components: - Conventions and Treaties (binding legal agreements between states): make up body of international environmental law2- Organizations - UNEP, IMO, IPCC- Participation is entirely voluntary. - Formal participation limited to states - Hard Law cf. Soft Law: - Soft Law or Norms: guiding ideas and principles; don't have the force of law, but may develop it; e.g. sustainable development; equityStages of negotiation: - agenda setting, negotiation, implementation and compliance, monitoring and enforcing;assessment and adjustment - Convention-Protocol Process: nested within the above process - a drawn-out process: 1. Framework Convention2. Detailed, binding protocols agreed later (egs): targets, funding (may also be done by amendment)3. Process of signature, ratification, coming into force4. Conferences of the Parties Strengths of this process: brings as many countries on board as possible; allows for the emergence and incorporation of new information - note Susskind's distinction between pragmatists and pessimists role of international organizations5. What are the obstacles to effective cooperation? 3Number of actorsstate interests and sovereignty: LCD bargainingdisadvantages poorer countriespowercapacitylack of enforcement - no dispute settlement proceduresmonitoringtoo many actors intractability of problemlong time horizonsassigning responsibility scientific uncertaintywho pays? On what basis?Distributional issuesNext Time: Biodiversity - typology - what is BD? Why is it important? What characteristics are important for the international community? What are sources of conflict around


View Full Document

Berkeley ESPM 169 - Lecture Notes

Download Lecture Notes
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view Lecture Notes and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view Lecture Notes 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?