DOC PREVIEW
UCSB ECON 1 - Oct7AdamSmithLimbo

This preview shows page 1-2-3-26-27-28 out of 28 pages.

Save
View full document
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 28 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 28 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 28 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 28 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 28 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 28 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 28 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

Adam Smith: (1723-1790) Wealth of Nations: 1776Smith’s Home Town: Edinburgh, ScotlandToday’s topicsHow did you get to UCSB today?How long is your commute to UCSB? (in miles, round to nearest mile)A demander with Buyer Value $50 buys an object from a supplier with Seller Cost $20. The sum of the buyer’s and the seller’s profit :Why is that?Clicker testOne more testAdam Smith’s Big Idea: Efficiency of Competitive MarketsWhat did Smith mean?Efficient is not the same as fairEfficiency and the size of the pieA Dramatic ProofTrade as matchmakingRandom matchingMaximizing total profitsLiving Supply and Demand CurvesWhat is the total amount of profits?What is the price?Market LimboNow too highGetting it ju…ssst rightCould profits be higher than competitive equilibrium profits?Maximizing number of transactionsWhat have we doneAssignment:And we’re out of hereAdam Smith: (1723-1790)Wealth of Nations: 1776Smith’s Home Town:Edinburgh, ScotlandToday’s topics•The efficiency of competitive equilibrium•Finding a competitive equilibriumHow did you get to UCSB today?A) WalkedB) Rode a bicycleC) SkateboardedD) DroveE) Used Public TransportationHow long is your commute to UCSB?(in miles, round to nearest mile)A demander with Buyer Value $50 buys an object from a supplier with Seller Cost $20. The sum of the buyer’s and the seller’s profit :A. depends on the price. Higher price means larger sum.B. is the same at all prices between $20 and $50.C. depends on the price. Lower price means smaller sum. D. None of the above.Why is that?•Buyer’s profit=BV-Price•Seller’s Profit =Price –SC•Buyers Profit +Seller’s profit= (BV-Price)+(Price-SC)=BV-SCSo sum of buyer’s and seller profit is BV-SC regardless of price.Clicker test•Press the button A on your clicker.One more test•Enter the number 12501 with your clickerAdam Smith’s Big Idea: Efficiency of Competitive Markets “Every individual neither intends to promote the public interest, nor knows how much he is promoting it. He intends only his own gain and he is in this led by an invisible hand to promote an end which was no part of his intention.”Adam Smith, Wealth of Nations, 1776What did Smith mean?•He said “markets promote the public interest.”•What is that?•A modern interpretation: “Competitive equilibrium is efficient.”•In the case of our experimental markets, this means the competitive equilibrium outcome maximizes total profits over all possible allocations. •This does not mean it maximizes every individual’s profits---just the sum.Efficient is not the same as fair•An outcome can be efficient, but grossly inequitable. •A system that gives almost all of the benefits go to only a few people would not be satisfactory to most people, even if it is efficient.•So why do we care about efficient?Efficiency and the size of the pie•A system is efficient if it maximizes the amount of resources to be divided.•If a pie is made larger, it becomes possible to give everyone a larger piece. •But of course it is also possible to increase the size of a pie while reducing the size of pieces given to some. •Efficiency is about the potential for mutual gain.A Dramatic Proof •We are going to act out a proof of the efficiency of competitive equilibrium.•We need:–15 volunteers in dark shirts–15 volunteers in light shirts–2 accountantsTrade as matchmaking•Dark shirts are “buyers”. Height of a buyer (in inches) is his or her Buyer Value.•Light shirts are “sellers”. Height of a seller (in inches) is his or her Seller Cost.•A trade is a match between a dark-shirted “buyer” and a light-shirted “seller”. •Total profits (or loss) from a match are the difference between the height of the dark shirt partner and that of the light shirt partner.Random matching•First we pair light and dark shirts at random and have them “trade” only if the dark shirt is taller than the light shirt. •Accountants will measure the total profits from these trades. •How many trades were there? •How much was total profit?Maximizing total profits•How could we arrange partnerships to maximize total profits?•One idea: Pair tallest dark shirt with shortest light shirt, second tallest dark with second shortest light, and so on until the next dark shirt is shorter than the next light shirt.•Other ways?Living Supply and Demand Curves•Line up Dark Shirt demanders in order of height, facing the class, with tallest at left of class.•Line up Light Shirt suppliers in front of the demanders in order of height, facing the class, with shortest at left of class.•These form a “demand curve” and a supply curve. •Where do the curves cross?•Suppliers turn and face demanders. You make a trade if Dark Shirt is taller than White Shirt partner and otherwise not.What is the total amount of profits?•Our Accountants will measure distances between buyer heights and seller heights and add them to compute total profits.•Could profits be increased by rearranging partners among those who trade?•Could total profits be increased by adding more trades?•Could profits be increased by exchanging somebody who traded with somebody who didn’t?What is the price?•How tall is shortest dark shirt who got a partner? •How tall is tallest light shirt who got a partner?•Let p be any number between these two heights.•How is p like an equilibrium price?•Suppose that we announced price p and said that anybody could buy or sell at price p.•Who would buy and who would sell?•Who would neither buy nor sell?Market Limbo•Line up dark shirts at left of stage, light shirts at right. •Accountants hold a broomstick 3” lower than “equilibrium height.”•Everyone from either side who can walk under the broomstick without stooping must do so.•Trades take place at left side of the room.•Is there excess demand or supply?Now too high •Return to original positions, Dark shirts on left, light shirts on right. •Set the broomstick 3” higher than equilibrium.•Everyone who can walk under without stooping goes to other side.•Is there excess demand or excess supply on the left side of the room?Getting it ju…ssst right•Return to original position.•Set broomstick at equilibrium height.•Everyone who can walk under does so.•Now supply equals demand.•Every dark shirt on left is taller than every light shirt on left. •All could profit by trading at


View Full Document

UCSB ECON 1 - Oct7AdamSmithLimbo

Download Oct7AdamSmithLimbo
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view Oct7AdamSmithLimbo and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view Oct7AdamSmithLimbo 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?