DOC PREVIEW
UCLA ECON 1 - Specialization and Trade

This preview shows page 1 out of 4 pages.

Save
View full document
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 4 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 4 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

Lecture 4Outline of Last Lecture I. The Ten Big Ideas, ideas 8-10II. Chapter Two: The Power of Trade and Comparative AdvantageOutline of Current Lecture I. Specialization and TradeII. The Price of TradeCurrent LectureRecap: Graph: Compare farmer’s PPF with rancher’s PPF (top graphs)- Note: If there is no trade, the farmer (A) (rancher-B) chooses this [A(B)] production and consumption. They are consuming what they are producing. Q: How would you quantify this added benefit? ECON 1 1st EditionWithout trade: Meat PotatoesFarmer (A) 4 oz 16 0zRancher (B) 12 oz 24 ozI. Specialization and TradeQ: How can the farmer and the rancher be better off by trading? Let’s say that the farmer decides to spend all 8 hours producing potatoes (specializing). The rancher spends6 hours/day raising cattle and 2 hours/day growing potatoes. What happens? Meat PotatoesFarmer 0 oz 32 ozRancher 18 oz in 6 hrs 12 oz in 6 hoursProductionWith trade: Farmer Meat PotatoesRancherMeat PotatoesProduction 0 oz 32 oz 18 oz 12 ozTrade Get 5 oz give 15 oz Give 5oz get 15 ozConsumption 5 oz 17 oz 13 oz 27 ozWithout Trade 4 oz 16 oz 12 oz 24 oz Gains +1 oz +1 oz +1 oz +3 oz They can consume moreafter trade. Graph: Consumption with trade-Central idea: Both are better off by trading! - We need to consider comparative advantage. Technically speaking, the farmer has advantage in both. The farmer has a comparative advantage over the rancher when making potatoes. II. Comparative AdvantageDef.: Absolute advantage: the ability to produce a good using fewer inputs than another producer. Ex: In this example, time is the input. Def.: Comparative advantage: The ability to produce a good at a lower opportunity cost than another producer.Opportunity cost table: 1oz meat 1oz potatoesFarmer 4oz potatoes ¼oz meat Rancher 2oz potatoes 1/2oz meat One is the reciprocal of the other. *Farmer: can do 4oz of potatoes OR 1oz of meat. o Who’s the low cost producer of potatoes? The farmer.o The rancher is the low cost producer of meat. o The gains come from the comparative NOT absolute advantage. III: The Price of TradeQuestion to self: What determines the price at which trade takes place?-Q: If there are gains to be made, how should they be shared between trading parties? -A: In general, for both parties to benefit from trade, the price at which they trade must lie between the two opportunity costs. o Ex: farmer gets 5oz of meat for the 15oz of potatoes. This is the same as 1oz of meat for 3oz of potatoes (in the range of 2-4).If these principles were extended to international trade, the same gains would apply. -Q: Should the U.S. trade with other countries? Yes. It allows the other countries to achieve prosperity. o On average, everyone can achieve equal prosperity but there are circumstances where that is not the case. o Ex: We trade food for cars with china, but the workers who make cars in the U.S. are affected and do not gain


View Full Document

UCLA ECON 1 - Specialization and Trade

Download Specialization and Trade
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view Specialization and Trade and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view Specialization and Trade 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?