DOC PREVIEW
ISU IE 361 - exam 1

This preview shows page 1-2-23-24 out of 24 pages.

Save
View full document
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 24 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 24 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 24 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 24 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 24 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

1 IE 361 Exam 1 (Corrected) Spring 2011 I have neither given nor received unauthorized assistance on this exam. ________________________________________________________ Name Date2 Below are 25 True-False Questions, worth 2 points each. Write one of "T" or "F" in front of each. _____ 1. Modern quality assurance is fundamentally process-oriented. _____ 2. If a production process is made to be consistent/physically stable, then it will of necessity produce good/functional product. _____ 3. Most effective process improvement analysis is based on data mined from large general- purpose databases. _____ 4. Shapes of histograms can provide clues to physical origins and thus clues about the operation of processes that generated the data being summarized. _____ 5. Complicated multi-step production processes are most effectively monitored through "end-of-the-line" inspection where a whole final product can be inspected, and causes of problems can thus be easily diagnosed. _____ 6. A bell-shaped histogram of consecutively-produced widget diameters is evidence that a production process is operating consistently over time, so nothing more can be revealed by plotting a run chart. _____ 7. A Pareto diagram is used to focus attention on the biggest causes of process problems. _____ 8. Without effective measurement systems, it is impossible to know whether a business or production process is performing well. _____ 9. Without appropriate routine collection and analysis of process data, it is impossible to know whether a business or production process is performing well. _____ 10. Measurement variation will typically inflate one's perception of process variation (based on the measurement of a sample of parts produced by a process). _____ 11. When measurement is destructive, there is no possibility of evaluating the size of pure repeatability variation. _____ 12. The width of a confidence interval for a standard deviation, , tells one about the size of . _____ 13. In order to compare biases of two measurement devices, one needs at least two "standards" (items with known values of measurands). _____ 14. Measurement device A is known to be linear, but is not known to be properly calibrated. I wish to know if device B is linear. That can be determined using A and B only if standards are available. _____ 15. A gauge R&R study typically reveals which of several operators produces the most accurate measurements.3 _____ 16. If widget diameters have actual standard deviation .01 mm and measurement has standard deviation .01 mm, then measured diameters can be expected to exhibit a standard deviation of .02 mm. _____ 17. In an R&R context, limitations on the amount of information available on reproducibility related to a relatively small number of operators being included in the study can be overcome by use of a large number of parts. _____ 18. If a gauge capability ratio (or precision to tolerance ratio) is at least 1.00, the gauge in question is probably adequate for checking conformance to the engineering specifications under study. _____ 19. Industry standard range-based gauge R&R analyses fail to produce appropriate estimates for reproducibility and lack associated confidence interval methods. _____ 20. Measurement precision can often be improved by finding an equation to use in replacing raw measurements with transformed or adjusted measurements. _____ 21. In a go/no-go R&R study, it is theoretically impossible for two operators to each be perfectly consistent in their go/no-go calls for a part, and yet have different probabilities of calling "go." _____ 22. Repeatability variance in a go/no-go R&R study is unlike that in a measurement R&R study, because it is assumed to vary "cell-to-cell." (If the part or operator changes, it typically changes.) _____ 23. If there is no reproducibility variance in a go/no-go R&R study, then all operators must be individually perfectly consistent in their go/no-go calls. _____ 24. Confidence limits .1 .02 for the difference in two "go" call rates for a fixed part by two different operators in a go/no-go study,12pp, indicates that there is no clear different in the call rates. _____ 25. In the estimation of 12pp based on 12 12ˆˆ.2, .3, and 10pp nn, approximate 95% confidence limits are .1 .41 . The next 5 pages each have a 10 point "work out" problem on them (numbered W1, W2,W3,W4, and W5.). Answer all 5.4W1. Two operators made 10m  go/no-go calls on each of 5I parts. The table below provides their "go" call rates. Make and interpret an appropriate 95% confidence interval for comparing overall (across all parts) "go" call rates for the two operators. Part Operator #1 "go" Call Rate Operator #2 "go" Call Rate 1 .2 .2 2 .1 .3 3 .8 .9 4 .4 .4 5 .9 1.0 Interval: Interpretation:5W2. 20 students each measured the size of a single Styrofoam packing peanut once. Their measurements produced a sample standard deviation of .014 in . Subsequently, a single student who missed class measured that same peanut 10 times. That person's measurements produced a standard deviation of .006 in . It is sensible here to say that the 20 measurements were observations each having (theoretical) variance 22reproducibility repeatability and that the 10 measurements were observations each having (theoretical) variance 2repeatability. This scenario is not exactly like any discussed in class, the modules, or the revision of V&J. But its basic structure is like one you've encountered, and a statistical method from class can be used to make approximate 95% confidence limits for reproducibility. Do this.6W3. Below is a JMP report from a data set collected to relate temperature to resistance of a carbon resistor. The report is for a fit of the model 2301 2 3yxxx      to the temperature ( K)x  and resistance ( )y  data pairs from the study. Plotted is the curve fit by least squares and 99.5% prediction limits for newy at each value of x. (Simple linear regression corresponding to the simpler model 01yx is clearly not appropriate here, but this cubic modeling seems to be sensible.) Consider the future use of this resistor to measure temperature. What


View Full Document

ISU IE 361 - exam 1

Download exam 1
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view exam 1 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view exam 1 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?