PSY402 Theories of LearningAttribution TheoryTwo Kinds of HelplessnessSeverity of DepressionHopelessness DepressionPessimismCognitive View of PhobiaSelf-EfficacyCriticisms of Efficacy ViewContemporary TheoriesStimulus-Substitution TheoryConditioned Opponent ResponseConditioning and Drug TolerancePSY402Theories of LearningFridayMarch 7, 2003Attribution TheoryCausal attributions of failure have three dimensions:Internal-external – internal traits or characteristics vs environmental forcesStable-unstable – past causes will persist vs new forces will determine future outcomesGlobal-specific – outcome relates only to one task vs outcome effects everything.Two Kinds of HelplessnessPersonal helplessness – an individual’s inability causes failure.Universal helplessness – the environment is structured so that no one can control future events.Abramson -- both kinds lead to depression.Vary on external-internal dimension.Low self-esteem only with personal.Severity of DepressionDepression can be transient if attributed to global but changing conditions.Severe depression occurs when attributions are:InternalGlobalStableBetter if external, specific, unstable.Hopelessness DepressionHopelessness – the expectation that desired outcomes will not occur.Learned helplessness -- no control over undesired outcomes.Accounts for anxiety without depression.Anxiety – possibility that a person may have no control over negative events.Depression occurs when certain.PessimismPessimistic explanatory style – attributional style predicts susceptibility to depression.Langer – a perceived control is basic to human functioning.Optimists – feel they can control events, more successful.Pessimists – believe they have no control over events.Cognitive View of PhobiaBandura – two kinds of expectancy maintain a phobia:Stimulus-outcome expectancy – about the nature of the stimulus.Response-outcome expectancy – about the likely result of behavior.Why does phobia produce behavior with negative outcomes?Efficacy expectancy – belief that one cannot execute a particular action.Self-EfficacyTypes of information used to establish self-efficacy:Personal accomplishments, success.Task difficulty, amount of effort.Observations of success/failure of others – vicarious modeling.Emotional arousal – we feel less able to cope when agitated or tense.Efficacy predicts approach behavior.Criticisms of Efficacy ViewEfficacy expectations may be epiphenomenal – arise with anxiety but do not affect responding.Three types of anxiety:Cognitive – affects self-efficacyPhysiological – affects physiologyBehavioral – affects responding.Lang – contribution of each depends on prior experience and situation.Contemporary TheoriesShift from global theories to theories about specific aspects of learning.Global theories were about operant responding not classical conditioning.An animal’s biology influences whether, what, and how fast it can learn.Cognitive view requires emphasis on specific cognitive processes.Stimulus-Substitution TheoryWhat is the nature of the CR – is it just the UCR of is it different?Pavlov – stimulus-substititon theory:The CS stimulates the same areas of the brain as the UCS, producing the same response.Activation of CS with UCS establishes neural connection between brain areas.Conditioned Opponent ResponseThe CR and UCR are often different:CR of fear is different than UCR of pain.Siegel – best evidence of difference:Morphine (UCS) produced analgesia, reduced pain (UCR) Light or tone (CS) produced hyperalgesia, increased pain (CR).Rats remove paws from heat quickly with CS, slowly with UCS.Insulin (glycemia) works the same wayConditioning and Drug ToleranceElimination of a CS results in a stronger response to the UCS, drug.Extinction of responding to environ-mental cues strengthens drug responseChanging the context in which a drug is administered increases response to the drug.Novel environment does not elicit an opponent
View Full Document
Unlocking...