DOC PREVIEW
UCSB ESM 223 - Overview of Alternatives

This preview shows page 1-2-3-24-25-26 out of 26 pages.

Save
View full document
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 26 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 26 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 26 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 26 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 26 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 26 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 26 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

ESM 2231ESM 223Response Actions:ContainmentESM 2232Overview of AlternativesContainmentIn-situ processesEx-situ processesExcavation and off-site treatmentESM 2233ContainmentHydraulic containmentPump groundwater at high rates to pull all of the dissolved contaminant plume into the extraction well(s)Slurry and Steel WallsPhysical barriers to slow down or stop groundwater flowMonitoringObservation wells for sample collection inside or outside the plume boundaryESM 2234Hydraulic containment Used to isolate contaminant plume from normal groundwater flow Prevents plume from reaching another aquifer, a water supply well or a surface water body (stream, river, lake) Requires above-ground treatment of extracted water (i.e. commonly known as pump-and-treat)ESM 2235Hydraulic containmentESM 2236Hydraulic containmentGroundwater normally flows along certain “streamlines’, driven by the slope of the water tableFunction of topographyrecharge ratesoil permeabilitiesdistance to the surface water discharge pointBy adding a pumping well, the streamlines around the well are diverted from the normal flow direction towards the wellESM 2237Hydraulic containmentESM 2238Hydraulic containmentESM 2239Hydraulic containment A well has a measurable “radius of influence”: Radius of influence indicates maximum distance at which a streamline can be captured by pumping at well)/2exp(QHrRwi∆=πESM 22310Hydraulic containment Radius of influence can be affected by other pumping wells nearby, or by a barrier (e.g. a building, bedrock, etc.) Proper design of the radius of influence (i.e. the “capture zone”) requires numerical modeling (e.g. using MODFLOW from USGS, a computer model for groundwater movement) Rules of thumb are commonly used by practitionersESM 22311Hydraulic containmentQ= flow (m3/s), B = aquifer thickness (m), U = GW velocity (m/s)ESM 22312Hydraulic containmentESM 22313Hydraulic containmentESM 22314Hydraulic containment Well-point system Several closely spaced wells connected to a main pipe Used in shallow aquifers where suction needed to pump water out of ground is relatively small Water table may be drawn down so far that shallow aquifer is completely dried around well: useful to extract any residual NAPLs using vapor extractionESM 22315Hydraulic containmentESM 22316Hydraulic containmentESM 22317Hydraulic containmentESM 22318Hydraulic containment Pressure Ridge System Injecting clean or treated water into subsurface along a line up- or down-gradient from plume Upgradient injection is used to force the contaminants into capture well(s), increasing flow into recovery wells, washing aquifer Downgradient injection is used to alter streamlinesProduces mound of water that acts as a barrierContains plumeKeeps clean water awayESM 22319Hydraulic containment Pumping or injection rates have to be balancedAchieve capture of plumeAvoid undesirable effects of excess drawdown of water table (e.g. settling, sink holes) Very high pumping rates are typically not effective, since do not allow for contaminants to desorb from soilPulsed pumping has been shown to be equivalent to slower pumpingESM 22320Hydraulic containmentObjective is to allow time for sorbed pollutant, or residual NAPL, to come to equilibrium with surrounding water between pumping intervalsESM 22321Hydraulic containmentPump-and-treat is generally ineffective in mobilizing residual NAPLPumping rates needed to mobilize residual NAPL are orders of magnitude greater than can be physically achieved in fieldESM 22322Hydraulic containment Volume of water in the polluted aquifer region to be treated is called a “pore volume” (PV) PV = L x H x W x θ Example: 100m x 50 m x 10m x 0.35 = 17,500 m3of PV Experimental work in bench scale studies indicates that at least 2 and sometimes more than 10 PV have to be pumped past the contaminated regionESM 22323Hydraulic containmentFor a quick, order of magnitude estimate on the time needed to dissolve NAPL from the source zone while pumping water through the zone:QCSPVQCSALtsatwnnsatwnndρρθ==ρn= density of NAPL = [kg/m3]Sn= saturation of NAPL = [-]Cwsat= water solubility (sat) = [kg/m3]Q = pumping rate = [m3/s]td= time for dissolution= [s]θ = porosity = [-]A = cross-section of polluted zone = [m2]L = length of polluted zone = [m]ESM 22324Hydraulic containment Can rarely achieve dissolution up to the water solubility; typically down to 1 - 10% Pollutant (NAPL) saturation in the soil is from a few samples (if lucky), and is probably not constant A is hard to define precisely=> estimating time to clean-up is an artESM 22325Hydraulic containment Cost Factors Design of pumping system (number and location of wells, pumping rates, estimate of pumping time, above-ground treatment) Permitting Well installation Above ground equipment installation Operation of wells and above-ground treatment equipment Monitoring (equipment, samples, analysis, reporting)ESM 22326Hydraulic containment Applicability of pump-and-treat: Very soluble organic contaminants (e.g. MTBE, Benzene) with low retardation factors (R < 3) Soluble inorganic pollutants with low background concentrations Sites where the source has already dissolved to a large extent Pumping Rates and removal typically 1 - 10 gpm per well quick calculation of pollutant removal should consider avg. conc.ESM 22327Physical barriers Slurry walls Place a low-permeability, subsurface cut-off wall that either directs flow of the contaminated plume through a small “gate”, orhydraulically isolates the contaminated zone Due to continuous recharge, even an isolated zone needs to be pumped to maintain a constant water tableESM 22328Physical barriersESM 22329Physical barriersESM 22330Physical barriersSlurry Walls“Funneling” the flow through a gate implies that pumping at the gate must be very high to capture all the plume“Walls” consist of vertical trenches, which can be excavated down to ~200ft (60m)Trench is filled with a very low permeability material (e.g. bentonite mixed with soil or cement)Physical barriersESM 22332Physical barriersESM 22333Physical barriersESM 22334Physical barriersESM 22335Physical barriersESM 22336Physical barriersESM 22337Physical barriersBentonite-soil walls are cheaper but last less timeCement-soil walls


View Full Document

UCSB ESM 223 - Overview of Alternatives

Download Overview of Alternatives
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view Overview of Alternatives and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view Overview of Alternatives 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?