DOC PREVIEW
CU-Boulder PHYS 2020 - Electromagnetic Waves

This preview shows page 1-2 out of 6 pages.

Save
View full document
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 6 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 6 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 6 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

22-1 (SJP, Phys 2020) Ch. 22: Electromagnetic waves. We’ve seen some of the ideas/discoveries of Ampere, Faraday, and others. So far, E & B seem different but somehow related. In what is perhaps one of a small handful of truly triumphant intellectual breakthroughs in physics, James Clerk Maxwell (a Scot, in the mid 1800’s) put it all together and came up with just four equations which described all electromagnetic phenomena! 1) Gauss’ Law : Charges create E, in specific “patterns”. E fields superpose. Coulomb’s Law is a “special case”. 2) The analogue of 1 for B fields (but, there are no magnetic monopoles ) 3) Faraday’s Law: Changing B makes E. 4) Ampere’s Law: Currents make B “New and Improved”: Changing E will also make B. This last piece was Maxwell’s insight. It was not based on experiments (like all the rest). Maxwell argued as a “theorist”, arguing from symmetry. (It was only later demonstrated in the lab.) The math of those 4 equations is a little tough (vector calculus is required). There are many consequences, but one in particular is quite remarkable: Imagine shaking a charge “q” up & down. The E-field is thus “shaking” too. Maxwell’s big insight was that a changing E induces (creates) a B-field. But this new B-field is itself “shaking”, so Faraday’s law says this in turn creates a new E-field, which creates a new B, which… Like wiggling a water molecule, which makes a neighbor wiggle, which makes its neighbor wiggle…= a traveling wave. But here, what exactly is waving? It’s nothing physical, exactly, it’s the E and B fields themselves turning on and off. You need a charge to start it, but the wave can them propagate through empty space (vacuum). You would call this an “Electromagnetic Wave” or “EM Wave”. People also call this “EM Radiation.” B wiggle charge B B B E E E E +22-2 (SJP, Phys 2020) Maxwell derived this mathematically. Perhaps he wondered, are there any examples of these EM waves in nature? Could we produce and observe such a wave in the lab? If you did, what would it “look” like? How fast would it travel? Giancoli “derives” the answer to this last question, but the math is pretty hard. Maxwell derived the speed of EM waves himself: speed = 4π k /µ0 = 1 /ε0µ0.. This is traditionally called “c”. • This formula is independent of the details of the wave. E.g., you get the same answer whether you have a little “pulse” traveling, or a full sinusoidal wave. • Recall, the constant of nature ε0=1/(4πk) = 8.85 ∗10-12 [C2/Nm2] Experimentally found with pithballs, cat fur, etc. (Ch.16) • The other (magnetic) constant of nature was µ0 =4π ∗10−7 [Τ m/A] Experimentally found with wires, compasses, and currents (Ch. 20) Both are known, fundamental constants of nature. Plugging in #’s: c = 1 /ε0µ0= 3.00⋅108m / s (≈ 186,000 mi / s) Try to imagine Maxwell’s reaction when he came up with this #, because it’s very familiar to physicists: it’s the speed of light! Can this be a coincidence, a numerical accident? Surely not. Maxwell had discovered the fundamental nature of light, light is a traveling electromagnetic wave! Physicists had struggled for 100’s of years to understand light. Newton thought light was a stream of little “particles”. But experiments in the early 1800’s had shown that light also behaves like a wave (with a very small wavelength), e.g. forming diffraction patterns, “bending” around corners, etc… Although light was believed to be a wave, no one knew what was “waving”. You don’t need water molecules, or air, or anything, for light to propagate. And now, in his calculation, Maxwell suddenly showed light must be a traveling EM wave. It’s the E and B fields themselves that “wave”. The whole idea was deep, profound, and extremely important, it brought together much of known physics into one coherent picture. (We’ll be discussing light for the next 3 chapters!) pulse sinusoidal sinusoidal22-3 (SJP, Phys 2020) Brief Review of Waves (see Giancoli Ch.11 for more review) You can watch the amplitude of the waving thing at one point in space (say x=0). (E.g. look at |E| at the origin) Period, T= 1/f f=frequency [f]=sec-1=Hz Alternatively, you can take a “snapshot” at some fixed time t. Then you graph amplitude as a function of position. If you take another “snapshot” a moment later, this wave will have moved (to the right, if that’s the direction of travel.) In time T (one period), the wave moves λ (one wavelength) (convince yourself!) So speed = dist/time = v = λ / T = λ f. (An important formula!) • For a “slinky wave”, those plots show the “transverse displacement” of the slinky. • For EM waves, the plots show the strength of |E| or |B| (if you have one, you’ll have the other, both E and B “wave” in synch.) • For EM waves, v = c is a constant of nature. Giancoli (Fig 22-7) tries to “sketch” a simple, traveling EM wave, heading off in the +x direction. Take a look - there are many important things to learn from that sketch, including: EM waves are “transverse”, meaning that E and B are perpendicular to the direction of travel. They are also perpendicular to each other. Waves can be “localized”, or not: a “plane wave” (like Giancoli shows) is not “localized” - E and B are uniform in the y and z directions, but traveling in the x direction. (You have to think about that one!) Amplitudetime -AT period, T A wavelength, λ Amplitude x -A A E B c λ f = c22-4 (SJP, Phys 2020) Light is a traveling electromagnetic wave. Visible light has wavelength λ = 400 nm (violet) up to 700 nm. (red) (“ROYGBIV”: Red Orange Yellow Green Blue Indigo Violet...) (“nm” = “nano meter” = 10^-9 m) Using λ f = c, I get f(yellow) = 3E8 m/s / 600 E-9 m = 5E14 Hz. (A big number!) You cannot mechanically shake anything 5E14 times/sec! But, some atomic electrons in, say, glowing hot metal do shake that rapidly, due to their thermal kinetic energy. Shaking charges emit EM waves (radiation!) with whatever frequency they are themselves shaking at. So, that’s why hot metal glows visibly - it emits EM radiation. When this EM wave hits your eye, what happens? There is an E field shaking up and down 5E14 times/sec. Remember, E fields accelerate charges - the electrons in your retina start


View Full Document

CU-Boulder PHYS 2020 - Electromagnetic Waves

Documents in this Course
Magnetism

Magnetism

17 pages

Lab #4

Lab #4

3 pages

Lab 9

Lab 9

6 pages

Lab 4

Lab 4

8 pages

Load more
Download Electromagnetic Waves
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view Electromagnetic Waves and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view Electromagnetic Waves 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?