DOC PREVIEW
UA BIOC 585 - Solving NMR structures II

This preview shows page 1-2-3-4-5-6 out of 18 pages.

Save
View full document
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 18 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 18 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 18 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 18 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 18 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 18 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 18 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

Solving NMR structures II: Calculation and evaluationCalculating NMR structuresIn NMR we don’t get a single structureThe NMR EnsembleRandom initial structuresCalculating the structures--methodsDG--Distance geometryrMD--Restrained molecular dynamicsPseudo-energy potentials for rMDSA-Simulated annealingAmbiguous restraintsCriteria for accepting structuresPrecision of NMR Structures (Resolution)Reporting RMSD“Minimized average”What do we need to get a high-resolution NMR structure?Assessing Structure QualityStructural Statistics TablesSolving NMR structures II:Calculation and evaluationThe NMR ensembleMethods for calculating structuresdistance geometry, restrained molecular dynamics, simulated annealingEvaluating the quality of NMR structuresresolution, stereochemical quality, restraint violations, etcCalculating NMR structures•so we’ve talked some about getting qualitative structural information from NMR, for instance certain secondary structures have characteristic nOe’s and J-couplings associated with them•we’ve also talked about the concept of explicit distance or dihedral angle or hydrogen bond restraints from nOe and J-coupling data etc.•how might we use such restraints to actually calculate a detailed, quantitative three-dimensional structure at a high level of accuracy and precision?In NMR we don’t get a single structure•the very first thing to recognize is that our input restraints do not uniquely define a structure at infinitely high precision (resolution) and accuracy--we can never have enough restraints, determined at high enough accuracy and precision, to do that!•rather, a set of many closely related structures will be compatible with these restraints--how closely related these compatible structures are will depend on how good/complete our data are!•the goal of NMR structure determination is therefore to produce a group of possible structures which is a fair representation of this compatible set.The NMR Ensemble•repeat the structure calculation many times to generate an ensemble of structures consistent w/restraints •ideally, the ensemble is representative of the permissible structures--the RMSD between ensemble members accurately reflects the extent of structural variation permitted by the restraintsensemble of 25 structuresfor Syrian hamster prion proteinLiu et al. Biochemistry (1999)38, 5362.Random initial structures•to get the most unbiased, representative ensemble, it is wise to start the calculations from a set of randomly generated starting structuresCalculating the structures--methods•distance geometry (DG)•restrained molecular dynamics (rMD)•simulated annealing (SA)•hybrid methodsDG--Distance geometry•In distance geometry, one uses the nOe-derived distance restraints to generate a distance matrix, from which one then calculates a structure•Structures calculated from distance geometry will produce the correct overall fold but usually have poor local geometry (e.g. improper bond angles, distances)•hence distance geometry must be combined with some extensive energy minimization method to generate good structuresrMD--Restrained molecular dynamics•Molecular dynamics involves computing the potential energy V with respect to the atomic coordinates. Usually this is defined as the sum of a number of terms:Vtotal= Vbond+ Vangle+ Vdihedr+ VvdW+ Vcoulomb+ VNMR•the first five terms here are “real” energy terms corresponding to such forces as van der Waals and electrostatic repulsions and attractions, cost of deforming bond lengths and angles...these come from some standard molecular force field like CHARMM or AMBER •the NMR restraints are incorporated into the VNMR term, which is a “pseudoenergy” or “pseudopotential” term included to represent the cost of violating the restraintsPseudo-energy potentials for rMD•Generate fake energy potentials representing the cost of violating the distance or angle restraints. Here’s an example of a distance restraint potentialKNOE(rij-rij1)2 if rij<rijlKNOE(rij-riju)2 if rij>riju0 if rijl<rij < riju VNOE =where rijl and riju are the lower and upper boundsof our distance restraint, and KNOE is somechosen force constant, typically ~ 250 kcal mol-1 nm-2So it’s somewhat permissible to violate restraints but it raises VSA-Simulated annealing•SA is very similar to rMD and uses similar potentials but employs raising the temperature of the system and then slow cooling in order not to get trapped in local energy minima•SA is very efficient at locating the global minimum of the target functionAmbiguous restraints•often not possible to tell which atoms are involved in a NOESY crosspeak, either because of a lack of stereospecific assignments or because multiple protons have the same chemical shift•possible to resolve many of these ambiguities iteratively during the calculation process•can generate an initial ensemble with only unambiguous restraints, and then use this ensemble to resolve ambiguities--e.g., if two atoms are never closer than say 9 Å in any ensemble structure, one can rule out an nOe between them•can also make stereospecific assignments iteratively using what are called floating chirality methods•there are now automatic routines for iterative assignment such as the program ARIA.Criteria for accepting structures•typical to generate 50 or more structures, but not all will converge to a final structure consistent with the restraints•therefore one uses acceptance criteria for including calculated structures in the ensemble, such as–no more than 1 nOe distance restraint violation greater than 0.4 Å–no dihedral angle restraint violations greater than 5–no gross violations of reasonable molecular geometry•sometimes structures are rejected on other grounds as well, such as having multiple residues with backbone angles in disallowed regions of Ramachandran space or simply having high potential energy in rMD simulationsPrecision of NMR Structures (Resolution)•judged by RMSD of ensemble of accepted structures•RMSDs for both backbone (C, N, CC=O) and all heavy atoms (i.e. everything except hydrogen) are typically reported, e.g.bb 0.6 Åheavy 1.4 Å •sometimes only the more ordered regions are included in the reported RMSD, e.g. for a 58 residue protein you will see RMSD (residues 5-58) if residues 1-4 are completely disordered.Reporting RMSD•two major ways of calculating RMSD of the ensemble:–pairwise: compute RMSDs for all possible


View Full Document

UA BIOC 585 - Solving NMR structures II

Download Solving NMR structures II
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view Solving NMR structures II and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view Solving NMR structures II 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?