DOC PREVIEW
MIT 9 00 - 9.00 Chapter 10

This preview shows page 1 out of 3 pages.

Save
View full document
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 3 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 3 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

CH 10 self-concept introspection self-awareness theory action Æ feeling (not vice versa) foot-in-the-door technique forced compliance justification of effort cognitive dissonance attitude – stable set of mental views and assessments about some idea object or person questionnaries (deficiencies?) explicit vs. implicit attitudes Implicit Association Test above-average effect self-serving bias impression management self-handicapping schemas – implicit theories of personality stereotypes illusory correlations COMPARE HOW WE USE SOCIAL SCHEMAS TO HOW WE USE COGNITIVE HEURISTICS attribution situational vs. dispositional fundamental attribution error actor-observer difference conformity yielding (when is yielding more likely to take place?) central route to persuasion vs. peripheral route to persuasion COMPARE THESE TWO ROUTES WITH THE SITUATIONAL vs. DISPOSITIONAL TENDENCIES IN ATTRIBUTION.obedience (situational or dispositional?) Milgram Zimbardo cognitive re-interpretations social impact theory social loafing social facilitation social inhibition great person theory (again, is this is a dispositional or situational theory?) group polarization risky shift groupthink deindividuation (situational? conformity? yielding?) DESCRIBE DEINDIVIDUATION IN TERMS OF SOCIAL IMPACT THEORY collectivist individualist in-groups out-groups WHICH ATTRIBUTES GO WITH WHICH KIND OF CULTURE? (e.g. above-average effect)CH 14 statistics frequency distribution (normal curve) mean, median, correlation coefficient predictive validity intelligence tests stanford binet SAT Q: what are some of the shortcomings of intelligence tests? what is their predictive validity? multiple intelligences (creative, practical, IQ) savants psychometric approach factor analysis Spearman’s g fluid vs. crystallized intelligence NATURE VS. NURTURE what is the debate? Q: frame in terms of situational vs. dispositional twin studies show ? heritability ratio phenotype vs. genotype (social effects of phenotype produce environmental effects (nurture) while genotype specifies nature) individual variability Q: compare intelligence tests with personality tests. shortcomings? validity? same kinds of factors? intelligence might be considered just that which is not situationally dependent, but an inherent characteristic of the


View Full Document

MIT 9 00 - 9.00 Chapter 10

Download 9.00 Chapter 10
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view 9.00 Chapter 10 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view 9.00 Chapter 10 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?